Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
Lisa Nandy says Sir Keir Starmer ‘very sensible’ to accept football tickets worth thousands | Politics News

Lisa Nandy has said Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to accept thousands of pounds worth of football tickets was “very sensible”.

The minister for culture, media and sport also said she had never accepted free clothes from a donor.

Speaking to Sky News at the start of the Labour Party conference today, the MP for Wigan said: “The problem that has arisen since [Sir Keir] became leader of the opposition and then prime minister is that for him to sit in the stands would require a huge security detail, would be disruptive for other people and it would cost the taxpayer a lot of money.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM ‘pays for his season ticket’

“So I think he’s taken a very sensible decision that’s not the right and appropriate thing to do, and it’s right to accept that he has to go and sit in a different area.

“But I know that he’d much rather be sitting in the stands cheering people on with the usual crowd that he’s been going to the football with for years.”

Ms Nandy also said while she has not accepted free clothes – joking “I think you can probably see that I choose my own clothes sadly” – she doesn’t “make any judgements about what other members of parliament do”.

Follow the latest on politics

She said: “The only judgement I would make is if they’re breaking the rules, so they’re trying to hide what they’re doing. That’s when problems arise.

“Because the point of being open and transparent is that people can see where the relationships are, and they can then judge for themselves whether there’s been any undue influence.”

She asserted there had not been an undue influence in gifts accepted by senior Labour figures, adding: “We don’t want the news and the commentary to be dominated by conversations about clothes.

“We rightly have a system, I think, where the taxpayer doesn’t fund these things. We don’t claim on expenses for them. And so MPs will always take donations, will always take gifts in kind.

“MPs of all political parties have historically done that and that is the system that we have.”

Read more:
Everything you need to know about Sir Keir’s freebies
Westminister Accounts: Search for your MP

She added: “I don’t think there’s any suggestion here that Keir Starmer has broken any rules. I don’t think there’s any suggestion that he’s done anything wrong.

“We expect our politicians to be well turned out, we expect them to be people who go out and represent us at different events and represent the country at different events and are clothed appropriately.

“But the point is that when we accept donations for that or for anything else, that we declare them and we’re open and transparent about them.”

👉 Click here to follow Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts 👈

Sir Keir, Angela Rayner and Rachel Reeves said yesterday they will no longer accept donations in the future to pay for clothes.

The announcement followed criticism of Sir Keir’s gifts from donors, which included clothing worth £16,200 and multiple pairs of glasses worth £2,485, according to the MPs’ register of interests.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

The register shows Ms Rayner has accepted clothing donations to the value of £2,230.

Sky News also revealed the scale of Sir Keir’s donations this week as part of our Westminster Accounts investigation.

Sir Keir was found to have received substantially more gifts and freebies than any other MP – his total in gifts, benefits, and hospitality topped £100,000 since December 2019.

Starmer to no longer accept donations to pay for clothes, Sky News understands | UK News

Sir Keir Starmer will no longer accept donations in the future to pay for clothes, Sky News understands.

Rachel Reeves and Angela Rayner also announced they would take the same approach moving forward.

The decision by the prime minister, chancellor and deputy prime minister follows scrutiny of Sir Keir Starmer and his wife for accepting donations.

The prime minister has accepted work clothing donations worth £16,200, and multiple pairs of glasses, to the value of £2,485.

Ms Rayner has accepted clothing donations too, to the value of £2,230.

The chancellor has not accepted any such donations, according to the MPs’ register of interests.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Nigel Farage has called out the Prime Minister for accepting free gifts at Reform UK’s annual conference in Birmingham.

Follow the latest on politics

Sky News revealed the scale of Sir Keir’s donations this week as part of our Westminster Accounts investigation.

Mr Starmer was found to have received substantially more gifts and freebies than any other MP as his total in gifts, benefits, and hospitality topped £100,000 since December 2019.

This had all been declared as per the rules but backbench MPs had been expressing concern that the government’s rhetoric of tough decisions on the economy jars with the image of a prime minister accepting freebies.

The row started over the weekend with controversy over Sir Keir’s wife’s clothes.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Jess Phillips, minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, said earlier today she is “satisfied with his [Mr Starmer’s] explanation” of why he has taken the freebies.

She said if he “wasn’t doing a good job in our country” and “set in train loads of things to change” – such as the railways, green investment, and tackling violence against women and girls, then she “would be more concerned”.

Ms Phillips went on to say it’s not that she doesn’t think it’s important, but added: “I haven’t had a single email about it.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sir Keir Starmer has insisted it would

“I have had lots of emails about people not being able to get on a housing list.”

Challenged on the fact that the optics look bad having just taken away the winter fuel allowance from pensioners, Ms Phillips said these are “completely separate things”.

“And had he never been to watch the Arsenal, there would still be a £22bn black hole that had to be paid for.”

She added: “All I can say is I’m absolutely knackered trying to make things better.”

What has Mr Starmer said in response to criticism?

Speaking to journalists this week, the prime minister said “all MPs get gifts” and he thinks the need to declare them is “a good framework”.

“Wherever there are gifts from anyone, I’m going to comply with the rules,” he said.

“It’s very important to me that the rules are followed. I’ve always said that. I said that before the election. I reinforced it after the election.”

On his acceptance of Arsenal tickets, he added: “I’m a massive Arsenal fan. I can’t go into the stands because of security reasons. Therefore, if I don’t accept a gift of hospitality, I can’t go to a game. You could say: ‘Well, bad luck.’

“That’s why gifts have to be registered. But… never going to an Arsenal game again because I can’t accept hospitality is pushing it a bit far.”

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

NHS consultants in England accept pay offer to end year-long dispute and strike action | UK News

Senior doctors in England have voted to accept an improved government pay deal, bringing to an end the year-long dispute which had led to strike action.

The British Medical Association (BMA), a trade union which has been representing the consultants, put the offer on pay and conditions to its members, with 83% voting in favour.

The pay deal includes changes to a doctors’ pay review body and a 2.85% (£3,000) uplift for those who have been senior doctors for four to seven years, who under the original offer received no additional uplift, said the BMA.

The offer is in addition to the 6% awarded during the Review Body on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration (DDRB) process last summer.

Strike action over the last two years has heaped more pressure on the NHS, where more than seven million patients remain on waiting lists for hospital treatment, leading to thousands of cancelled appointments and procedures.

It has also piled pressure on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak ahead of an expected election later this year, as polls suggest the Tory party is trailing heavily behind Labour.

He hailed the deal as “excellent news” for patients after admitting in February that he had failed to cut NHS waiting lists, a key government pledge.

“The end of consultant strike action in the NHS is excellent news for patients. It will mean we can continue making progress towards our goal of cutting the waiting lists, which have now fallen for the fourth month in a row,” he said.

“Consultants perform a vital role at the heart of the NHS – I’m pleased they’ve accepted this deal, which is fair for them and fair for the taxpayer.”

While NHS nurses ended strike action last year following a pay deal, a long-running pay dispute with junior doctors, who staged a five-day strike in February, remains ongoing.

‘Without valuing doctors, we lose them’

Dr Vishal Sharma, who chairs the BMA consultants committee, said “at the heart of this dispute was our concern for patients and the future sustainability of the NHS”.

He described the consultants’ strike action as “unprecedented” following “years of repeated real-term pay cuts”.

Dr Sharma went on to say “it’s now imperative that the DDRB utilises its independence to restore doctors’ pay and prevent any further disputes from arising.

“We’ve reached this point not just through our tough negotiations with the Government, but thanks to the resolve of consultants, who took the difficult decision to strike, and did so safely and effectively, on multiple occasions, sending a clear message that they would not back down.

“At the heart of this dispute was our concern for patients and the future sustainability of the NHS. Without valuing doctors, we lose them. Without doctors, we have no NHS and patients suffer.”

Read more from Sky News:
‘Fantasy world’ flat secretly converted by tenant receives Grade II listed status

UK weather: Warning of 70mph winds as Storm Kathleen moves in

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Health and Social Care Secretary Victoria Atkins said the government’s offer was “fair and reasonable” and the deal eliminated the threat of further strikes.

She added: “Consultants will now be able to focus on providing the highest quality care for patients and we can consolidate our progress on waiting lists – which have fallen for the past four months.

“This deal directly addresses gender pay issues in the NHS and enhances consultants’ parental leave options – representing a fair deal for consultants, patients, and taxpayers.”

Valdo Calocane: Prosecutors correct to accept Nottingham killer’s manslaughter pleas, report finds | UK News

Prosecutors were correct to accept Nottingham killer Valdo Calocane’s manslaughter by diminished responsibility pleas rather than pursue a murder case, the CPS inspectorate has found.

Calocane, 32, stabbed to death students Barnaby Webber and Grace O’Malley-Kumar, both 19, and 65-year-old school caretaker Ian Coates in June last year.

The attorney general ordered an urgent review into the CPS’s handling of the case after families of the three victims said they were bitterly disappointed that a murder case was not pursued by prosecutors.

They also felt they had not been properly informed about the decision before it was made.

(L-R)  Ian Coates, Barnaby Webber, Grace O'Malley-Kumar
Image:
(L-R) Ian Coates, Barnaby Webber, Grace O’Malley-Kumar

His Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) said in their report published on Monday that the CPS were correct to accept Calocane’s manslaughter by diminished responsibility pleas and a good service was provided to families.

However, the report said there was room for improvement, recommending that the CPS in future provide written guidance to help police family liaison officers explain legal concepts to bereaved families.

They also suggested that the use of the word “consult” when referring to engagement with the families around the legal decision-making in this case may have contributed to a general misunderstanding of the CPS’s obligations to bereaved families.

This is because there is no obligation for the CPS to “consult” victims when deciding on the evidential test of the Code for Crown Prosecutors, but rather to “inform” and “explain” their decision.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Murderers can get away with murder’

Read more from Sky News:
Nottingham attacks: Timeline of missed opportunities
Killer’s ‘unduly lenient’ sentence referred to Court of Appeal

The report said: “It is understandable why the bereaved families find the decision by the CPS to accept the pleas of not guilty to murder but guilty to manslaughter difficult to accept.

“Their loved ones were violently killed by an offender who knew what he was doing was wrong and who intended to kill them.

“The term manslaughter has the perception to underplay the gravity of what has taken place.”

The report made two recommendations – the first that, by October 2024, the CPS must undertake a review of guidance relating to victims’ engagement to ensure all staff are aware when the use of the terms “consult” or “consultation” is appropriate.

It also recommended that the government consider whether homicide should be categorised into three tiers – first degree murder, second degree murder in cases of diminished responsibility, and manslaughter.

Pic: Nottinghamshire Police/PA
Screen grab taken from CCTV dated 13/06/23 and time stamped at 04.13am issued by Nottinghamshire Police of Valdo Calocane walking along Radford Boulevard, Nottingham. Valdo Calocane, who stabbed three people to death in Nottingham city centre and attacked three others, has been sentenced at Nottingham Crown Court to a hospital order after admitting manslaughter by diminished responsibility and attempted murder. Issue date: Thursday January 25, 2024.
Image:
Valdo Calocane walking along Radford Boulevard, Nottingham, prior to the attack. Pic: Nottinghamshire Police/PA

Under such a system – recommended by the Law Commission in 2006 – the unlawful killings in this case would have been categorised as murder, albeit second degree murder, according to the report.

‘Murderers can get away with murder’

Barnaby Webber’s mother, Emma Webber, said she was “disappointed but not entirely surprised” by the outcome.

“Until the law changes in this country, the diminished responsibility charge and plea means that murderers can get away with murder,” she said.

“We’ve never disputed Calocane’s mental health problem, but what I would say is that, at the moment, in this country, and you have mental health problems, it is very unlikely then you are actually going to be tried for murder.

“And it is abhorrent that it can be downgraded to diminished responsibility, just because it is how the law is stated.”

Emma Webber, mother of Barnaby Webber, outside Nottingham Crown Court 
Pic: PA
Image:
Emma Webber said she was “disappointed but not entirely surprised” by the outcome of the report. Pic: PA


In response, Stephen Parkinson, director of Public Prosecutions, said: “In tragic and complex circumstances such as these, the CPS has difficult decisions to make, but must always act with independence and professionalism.

“I believe that our team did so in this case, and with considerable dedication and commitment.

“I am grateful to the Inspectorate for the care and thoroughness with which they have reviewed our actions. We will carefully consider the report’s findings.”

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak previously promised the victims’ families that “we will get the answers” but their calls for a public inquiry have so far gone unanswered.

Other investigations into the actions of police and mental health staff continue.