Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom1xbet giriş1xbetdeneme bonusu veren sitelercasino sitelericasino siteleri
‘Too little, too late’: Family reject ambulance service’s apology following review into failures and coverups | UK News

Ambulance bosses have apologised after staff were accused of covering up errors when patients died – but grieving families say this is “too little, too late”.

A review into allegations of failures at North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) found problems with how the trust responded to incidents, and highlighted “significant culture and behavioural issues”.

One of the cases highlighted concerned Quinn Evie Milburn-Beadle, a 17-year-old who was found hanging not far from her home in County Durham in 2018.

Quinn Evie Milburn-Beadle
Image:
Quinn Evie Milburn-Beadle

A NEAS paramedic declared her dead rather than trying to perform CPR. They have since been struck off, and the review found they had ignored national and local guidelines by not attempting advanced life support techniques.

“However small the probability of recovery was, [she] deserved that chance and so did her family,” the review led by retired hospital boss Dame Marianne Griffiths said.

It also noted that the trusts “coronial processes were not followed” as vital evidence for the coroner was withheld by NEAS.

Speaking to Sky News, Quinn’s parents David and Tracey Beadle described the report as a “whitewash” and “disappointing” – and called for a public inquiry.

Ms Beadle said: “It’s too little, too late. They’ve never apologised face to face to us, if they had held their hands up and admitted their failure and lying sooner then maybe I could accept the apology, but it’s gone too far for us now.

“We know there was a very very small chance that Quinn could have been saved that night, but to know not everything was done to help her, it keeps you awake at night.

“If that paramedic had kept her alive long enough to get her to hospital we could have all held her hand and said goodbye.

“I had to tell my son his little sister died on the phone, it was horrific. All of that could have been changed if he’d just done what he should have done.”

David and Tracey Beadle
Image:
David and Tracey Beadle

Another case involved the death of a 62-year-old man who urgently needed oxygen, with one crew hampered by a power cut that locked the gates at the ambulance station, and another unable initially to find his key safe to get into his home.

The chief executive of North East Ambulance Service, Helen Ray, told Sky News: “As a service, we let those families down at a point in time that they needed us and I’m deeply sorry for the distress that has caused them.

“An apology isn’t enough but this is an organisation that accepts that they’ve done something wrong, they’ve learned from it and they’re doing their very best to make sure that cannot reoccur.”

When asked about rebuilding trust with the people of the North East, Ms Ray said she’s confident the service is moving in the right direction.

“I understand the public will have concerns when they read this report, but we have learned from these situations from the four families and we have taken action. There may have been issues where people did not follow our systems and processes, when those are brought to our attention we act on those appropriately.”

Helen Ray
Image:
Helen Ray

The review, which was commissioned by then health secretary Sajid Javid in 2022, also looked into how the ambulance service dealt with whistleblowing following staff members raising concerns about practice within the trust.

Paul Calvert, one of the NEAS whistleblowers, says this report isn’t the full truth – and he alleges there are “dozens and dozens” more cases that are being covered up.

He told Sky News: “It doesn’t explain why information was held from the coroner in these four cases, because fundamentally it’s about dishonesty and the families deserve the truth. That’s what a proper judicial led public inquiry will give and deliver. This report delivers nothing but regurgitation of the facts that were already known.”

He added: “The trust has been a huge failure. It was obvious it was a failure when I joined in 2018. It’s a dysfunctional entity with extremely poor governance with a toxic bullying culture that fosters cover ups.”

Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK.

Harry and Meghan reject The Sun’s Clarkson apology – calling it ‘nothing more than a PR stunt’ | UK News

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have dismissed an apology by The Sun for a column by Jeremy Clarkson as “nothing more than a PR stunt”.

A spokeswoman for the Duchess said the newspaper had not contacted her to apologise for the column, in which Clarkson wrote he was “dreaming of the day when she is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while crowds chant, ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her”.

The column, published last weekend, became the most complained about on record, with the Independent Press Standards Organisation receiving more than 20,800 complaints by 5pm on Tuesday.

The Sun apologised yesterday, saying: “We at The Sun regret the publication of this article and we are sincerely sorry.

“The article has been removed from our website and archives.”

The spokeswoman for the Duchess said: “The fact that The Sun has not contacted The Duchess of Sussex to apologise shows their intent.

“This is nothing more than a PR stunt.

More on Duchess Of Sussex

“While the public absolutely deserves the publication’s regrets for their dangerous comments, we shouldn’t be in this situation if The Sun did not continue to profit off of and exploit hate, violence and misogyny.

“A true apology would be a shift in their coverage and ethical standards for all.

“Unfortunately, we’re not holding our breath.”

Meghan and Harry’s documentary

The column, in which Clarkson said he “hated” Meghan, came after the couple’s highly anticipated Netflix documentary series.

The Sussexes opened up about their experiences in the “institution” and the difficulties they faced due to negative media coverage.

Clarkson then used his column to describe his frustration at the Duchess.

More than 60 MPs wrote to the editor of the newspaper to condemn the piece “in the strongest terms”.

The letter put forward by Conservative MP Caroline Nokes demanded the publication take action against Clarkson.

It said the former Top Gear presenter’s “hateful” article had contributed to an “unacceptable climate of hatred and violence”.

A senior ITV executive said his comments were “awful” but Clarkson will continue as host of Who Wants To Be a Millionaire? “at the moment“.