Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
In one of London’s most dangerous areas, being in the wrong place at the wrong time can be deadly | UK News

“Jaden” was stabbed a couple of weeks ago while walking the streets of Croydon, south London.  

Luckily for him, it wasn’t serious. But a week later, he was arrested for carrying a knife of his own.

When we meet him, he tells us he is appearing before the magistrates in the morning.

The thing is, Jaden – which is not his real name – is only 13 years-old.

He seems a quiet boy, dressed in black tracksuit bottoms and wearing a dark coat with the hood pulled up over his head.

A bag is slung over one shoulder and he is constantly looking down at his phone.

We ask about the stabbing. What happened?

He pauses for a moment, then says: “Wrong place, wrong time.”

Welcome to Croydon, one of the most dangerous boroughs in the capital for a child to grow up in. Where “wrong place, wrong time” can be a lethal combination.

It is where local services have been decimated. The local council has declared that it is effectively bankrupt.

And it is where children carry knifes.

Youth worker James Watkins
Image:
Community worker James Watkins

There is another huge issue affecting Jaden’s life. He has not been to school at all this year, and that is putting him in huge danger, says James Watkins, a community worker.

“I think a lot of the older gang members target young people who have stopped going to school because they see them as vulnerable,” he explains.

“Sometimes young people just need to feel like they belong and because they’ve been kicked out of school they feel almost cast out of society and they can become easy targets.”

Nearly half of all children in Croydon who are excluded from school are black. And official figures show that excluded children rarely return to mainstream school. They are cast out to the fringes of an already overstretched education system.

Like most excluded kids, Jaden ended up in a pupil referral unit (PRU) – a segregated school for youngsters for whom no mainstream school can be found. He has been excluded from two PRUs.

This group of children run the risk of disappearing from the system altogether, and are often called “ghost children”.

But demand for PRU is high and places are often hard to come by, according to Nicola Peters, from the Project for Youth Empowerment.

“The situation is just getting worse by the day and I don’t see it getting any better. Demand is skyrocketing and the numbers of children being excluded keeps going up and up.

“There are pupil referral units popping up all over the place and we cannot accommodate all of the children who are being excluded.

“The education system for these kids is collapsing. For a lot of them, school is old and out of date and no longer supports their needs.”

Read more:
Thousands are missing school
The ‘ghost children’ crisis explained
Absence in schools is now at crisis point

The number of children regularly absent from school is double what it was before the pandemic.

Reports of an increase in anxiety among youngsters is also putting pressure on schools.

But there is also some evidence to suggest that there has been a “seismic” shift in parental attitudes towards school attendance.

A report, compiled by the public policy research agency Public First, draws on focus group conversations with parents from different backgrounds across the country, which shed some light on why children are not always in lessons.

A mother of two primary school children from Manchester told the report’s authors: “Pre-COVID, I was very much about getting the kids into school, you know, attendance was a big thing. Education was a major thing.

“After COVID, I’m not gonna lie to you, my take on attendance and absence now is like I don’t really care anymore. Life’s too short.”

But the bigger picture shows a lack of progress by government to tackle the problem.

A recent report by the Education Select Committee, made up of cross-party MPs, was critical of the government’s response to this crisis – saying there had been “no significant improvement in the speed” of reducing the absence numbers to pre-pandemic levels.

Andy Cook chief executive of the Centre for Social Justice
Image:
Andy Cook chief executive of the Centre for Social Justice

Andy Cook, chief executive of the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), a centre-right think tank, says the crisis could have far reaching consequences for society.

“You go into any prison and you talk to the people there, 90% of them say they missed a lot of school on a regular basis. So we need to take this seriously.”

The CSJ says up to 9,000 more young offenders, including 2,000 violent criminals, could be on Britain’s streets by 2027 because of a rise in school absence, according to calculations based on official studies.

“We are storing up ourselves a load of problems,” Mr Cook warned.

“This issue is the whole ball game. It’s the ticking time bomb that’s already gone off. It is the most urgent thing facing us.”

UK’s worst areas for broadband outages revealed – and what to do if yours goes down | Science & Tech News

More than 21 million people have suffered broadband outages of three hours or more over the last year, according to new research.

The number has almost doubled compared to what was reported in Uswitch’s previous annual study into Britain’s internet services, with people said to be becoming increasingly aggrieved by disconnections.

With more employees relying on their broadband to work from home since the pandemic, the company said such outages have overtaken roadworks and public transport delays as one of our biggest collective frustrations.

Uswitch’s report found 15% of people have been prevented from working due to disconnections, and a quarter have been left without internet for almost a full week or more.

The top issues were supplier outages, router problems, and maintenance to external cables.

Uswitch said the number of people affected by outages had risen from around 12 million the previous year to 21.7 million over the last 12 months.

People’s woes were particularly pronounced outside London, with Southampton the worst affected city.

Cities with the worst average internet downtime:

• Southampton – 63 hours

• Newcastle – 57 hours

• Birmingham – 47 hours

• Liverpool – 44 hours

• Nottingham – 33 hours

London’s average broadband outage was less than 14 hours.

The damning findings back up recent research by consumer watchdog Which?, which found more than half of broadband customers continued to face difficulties despite providers hiking prices.

Image:
You might need to try turning it off and on again…

‘This is not acceptable’

Ernest Doku, a telecoms expert at Uswitch, said: “This is not acceptable in a cost of living crisis, especially considering the ongoing reliance on home internet for many UK workers.

“It’s also concerning that there seems to be a significant disparity in customer experience between customers in London and those around the country, who have to settle for less.

“The good news is that there is a lot of competition in the broadband market, including smaller, disruptive providers offering faster speeds at competitive prices.”

It comes after a charity warned the poorest in society are having to go without internet, despite it becoming an increasingly essential service.

Among Uswitch’s suggested providers for cheaper deals are Hyperoptic, Gigaclear, and Community Fibre.

But the company’s survey found despite experiencing problems, most people plan to stick with their provider.

Some of the most popular are BT, Virgin Media, EE, and Sky (the owner of Sky News).

Read more science and tech news:
UK COVID rate estimated as cases rise
Rare opportunity to see comet with naked eye
How heartbreak damages our brain and our body

What to do if your internet goes down

For those not keen on changing provider, Uswitch’s report offered advice on what to do if your internet goes down.

• Check your router – sometimes a quick reset (the old turn it off and on again routine) really does work, especially if you’ve not done it for a while.

• Status updates – most major providers have a dedicated page where you can input your postcode to see if your outage might be connected to a wider issue or something on your end.

• Backup plan – if you’re going to be without internet for a while and need it, consider using your smartphone as a mobile hotspot (but make sure your contract supports it).

• Compensation – Uswitch’s survey found most of us don’t bother seeking compensation, but if disconnections are your provider’s fault then you should seek it out if they don’t fix the issue after two working days.

• Speed monitoring – outages are the worst, but slow speeds are super frustrating too. Your provider should be guaranteeing you a minimum so make sure you’re getting it.

Nearly a third of councils in poor areas considering bankruptcy within next two years | Politics News

At least 26 councils in some of the poorest areas of the country are considering declaring effective bankruptcy within the next two years, it has emerged.

A survey of 47 local authorities in the North, the Midlands and on the South Coast revealed a severe strain on finances driven by the depletion of cash reserves available to cover gaps in budgets.

Five members of the Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities (Sigoma) said they were in the process of deciding whether to issue a section 114 notice of their inability to balance their annual budget in 2023/24.

Another nine said they may have to declare bankruptcy next year.

Nadine Dorries refuses to confirm she will vote Tory at next general election – latest updates

Sigoma said it was the first time many member councils were considering issuing a section 114 notice, which freezes all non-essential spending.

It said it understands at least 12 other councils across the country are now considering issuing a section 114 notice in 2023/24.

Councils said the most common cause of financial pressures was demand for children’s social care services following requests from the government to treat those services as an equal priority with adult social care, and allocate additional funding.

Other significant factors cited were inflation costs and wage rises, with warnings an imminent increase in the cost of borrowing is set to add further financial pressure.

The first S114 notice was issued by Hackney Council in 2000 and Northamptonshire County Council followed suit in 2018.

But since then councils have begun declaring bankruptcy at an unprecedented rate, with S114 notices recently issued by Conservative-run councils Thurrock and Woking and Labour-run Croydon and Slough.

Government ‘needs to recognise significant inflationary pressures’

Sir Stephen Houghton, Labour leader of Barnsley Council and Sigoma chair, said: “The government needs to recognise the significant inflationary pressures that local authorities have had to deal with in the last 12 months.

“At the same time as inflationary pressure, councils are facing increasing demand for services, particularly in the care sector.

“Pay increases are putting substantial pressure on budgets, and so the government must ensure that local authorities have the additional funding they need to fully fund these pay increases or risk impacting future service delivery.

“The funding system is completely broken. Councils have worked miracles for the past 13 years, but there is nothing left.”

Councils ‘ultimately responsible’ for managing own finances

A government spokesperson said: “Councils are ultimately responsible for the management of their own finances.

“However, the government has been clear that local authorities should not take excessive risk with taxpayers’ money, and we have established the Office for Local Government to improve the accountability for performance across the sector.”

The ‘lung MOT’ scan trucks helping to diagnose lung cancer earlier in deprived areas | UK News

People in deprived areas are now more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer at an earlier stage, thanks to the success of trucks offering chest scans in supermarket car parks, the NHS has said.

For the first time ever, data shows more than a third of people diagnosed with lung cancer from the most deprived 20% of England had the disease detected at stage one or two in 2022 (34.5%) – up from 30% in 2019.

Now at 43 sites across the country, the mobile trucks scan those most at risk from lung cancer, including current and ex-smokers.

One person who has benefited from the “Lung MOT’s”, which were launched in 2018 in areas of the country with the lowest lung cancer survival rates, is Sandra Sloane.

Sandra, 69, a retired former smoker, was called for a scan, before being diagnosed in May 2021.

The scan was in the local area, a five-minute drive away and took around two minutes to complete.

Remembering the news of her diagnosis, she said: “I thought that was it, my days were over.

“I just went to pieces; I couldn’t stop crying. I was frightened.”

Sandra Sloane
Image:
Sandra Sloane was diagnosed in May 2021

But thanks to her early diagnosis, Sandra had surgery to remove the cancer two months later, before being given all-clear.

“I was the happiest person on earth that day, I was home by Saturday teatime. All I’ve got is a scar about two inches long. The scan I had was five minutes away, and it saved my life.”

She is one of more than 300,000 people who have already taken up the offer and visited the trucks, which have diagnosed more than 1,750 people with lung cancer.

Over three quarters (76%) were caught at stage one or two, compared with just a third caught at early stages in 2018.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

NHS tackles liver cancer with trucks

The link between deprivation and worse cancer outcomes is based on a number of factors.

Professor Peter Johnson, National Clinical Director for Cancer, NHS England, said: “We know that people who are less well-off are more likely to smoke, they find it more difficult to see their GPs and more often they live in parts of the country where the health service has less resources.”

Lung scan

Read more:
Ancient viruses in human DNA could help fight cancer
Cancer survivor with no ovaries gives birth to ‘miracle’ baby

A report by Cancer Research published in 2020 supports this.

It found there were more than 30,000 extra cases of cancer attributable to socio-economic deprivation, with the starkest differences seen in smoking-related cancers, like lung cancer.

The success of the NHS scheme so far has come in targeting those groups.

“It used to be that people who were least well off were most likely to have lung cancer at an advanced stage when we found it,” said Prof Johnson.

“By taking these CT scans to people in that group and by diagnosing lung cancer earlier than ever before we have actually turned that trend on its head. So people who are least well off are now more likely to have their lung cancer identified at an early stage than anybody else.”

NHS pay rises will cost £4bn and will be funded from ‘areas of underspending’, govt says | Politics News

The government needs to find £4bn in spare cash to fund NHS pay rises, with some of it coming from “areas of underspend”.

The one-off payment offered to frontline workers on Thursday will cost £2.7bn, Downing Street has said, while the 5% pay rise will cost £1.3bn.

A 3.5% pay increase had already been factored into the existing budget before a new deal was put to health unions, leaving ministers scrambling to find the rest.

Asked where the money will come from, the PM’s spokesperson said “areas of underspending” had been identified.

They did not go into specifics but added “we will discuss with Treasury and work together to resolve any new funding needs”.

Pressed on the source of the funding again, they said the money is “not coming from patient-facing services”.

Ministers previously said they can’t afford to give striking NHS workers a pay rise because the money would have to be taken out of the existing NHS budget – which was not considered an option at a time of record-high waiting lists.

But there was a major breakthrough on Thursday as the government and unions reached a new deal that could herald the end of industrial action across most of the health service.

The offer consists of a one-off payment of 2% of their salary plus a COVID recovery bonus of 4% for the current financial year 2022/23, and a 5% pay increase for 2023/24.

Workers on the picket line outside Queen Elizabeth hospital in Birmingham during a strike by nurses and ambulance staff. Picture date: Monday February 6, 2023.
Image:
The government has insisted the pay deal to end strikes won’t come out of the budget for patient services

Health Secretary Steve Barclay said it will apply to thousands of key workers including nurses, paramedics and midwives but could not say how the rise would be funded.

When questioned on this he deferred to the Treasury, saying only that it “would not come from areas of the budget that impact on patients”.

The prime minister gave a similar answer when pressed during a visit to a south London hospital on whether patient care would be hit, saying: “Absolutely not. We’re going to be making sure we protect all frontline services with £14bn of more funding we announced at the end of last year.”

Unions have recommended members vote for the pay rise, and have agreed to pause industrial action during that process.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Junior doctors have welcomed pay talks with the Health Secretary and are ‘hopeful’ the dispute can be resolved to avert further strikes.

Tens of thousands of nurses, paramedics and other healthcare staff went on strike just before Christmas, then again in January and February, leading to the cancellation of around 140,000 appointments and operations.

Labour have criticised the government for delays in getting around the negotiating table, with shadow health secretary Wes Streeting branding his government counterpart “lastminute.com Steve Barclay”.

Speaking to Sky News, he accused the health secretary of “having cheek” by deferring questions on how the pay rise will be funded to the Treasury, adding: “Newsflash Steve Barclay, the budget was yesterday.

“If he pulled his finger out before Christmas and negotiated a deal, not only would we have avoided the strike action and the 140,000 cancelled operations and appointments, he might have got a better deal for the NHS.”

The breakthrough has sparked hopes of resolving other long-running industrial disputes, with the government and education unions beginning “intensive” talks today on pay and conditions.

Asked whether an offer to teachers could look similar to the NHS deal, the PM’s spokesperson stressed that each pay offer is “unique”, and the two-pronged agreement is “specific to the work NHS staff have done”.

Asked if that recognition will apply to junior doctors, who are embroiled in a separate dispute, the spokesperson said: “We want talks to start as soon as possible but its dependent on them cancelling or pausing strikes. As soon as they pause strike action we can have talks.”

Lack of cover for category two ambulance calls in some areas put public safety at risk, Steve Barclay says | Politics News

The health secretary claims the disparate level of emergency cover during recent ambulance strikes could not be “relied upon to ensure patient and public safety”.

In a letter to the GMB union sent ahead of further strikes this month, and seen by Sky News, Steve Barclay accepted all areas that staged walkouts ensured the most serious 999 calls were still answered.

But he said the lack of cover for category two calls – which includes strokes and chest pain – in some areas were “material to the risk to life of the strike action”.

Mr Barclay said the government “greatly values the vital work ambulance workers do”, but he criticised the “volatile” assurances given to him about cover by trade unions during December’s industrial action, claiming the “scope and extent of arrangements [was] being disputed right up to wire”.

While he believed in the right to strike and that “a certain amount of disruption is inherent” during walkouts, he said that “during recent action I have not been reassured that the current system of voluntary arrangements can be relied upon to ensure patient and public safety”.

His letter comes in response to an open letter from the GMB to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Saturday, where the union claimed ambulance staff felt “demonised” and appealed to the government to “stop attacking us”.

It also comes ahead of the government’s anti-strike legislation returning to the Commons on Monday, which will set minimum service levels for fire, ambulance and rail services for when the sectors decide to take action – and leave unions at risk of being sued if they fail to comply.

Read more:
Strikes this month – who is taking action and when

NHS waiting lists are a ‘national scandal’
Nursing union threatens biggest walkout to date

Mr Barclay strongly defended the new law in the letter, saying it would “introduce greater clarity and certainty around which services must continue and to what extent, to give the public much needed assurance that a certain level of urgent and time critical care will always continue throughout strike action”

The health secretary said the particular services that would be impacted by the legislation where chosen “chiefly because we recognise disruption to blue light services puts lives at immediate risk”, but he insisted it was “not ending anyone’s right to strike”.

Click to subscribe to the Sophy Ridge on Sunday podcast

But Labour has vowed to vote against the bill, with party leader Sir Keir Starmer urging the government to “do the grown-up thing, get in the room and negotiate” with the unions.

A spokesperson for the GMB said the union’s ambulance committee would discuss the letter from Mr Barclay at a meeting on Monday and consider their response.

If you are an NHS worker and would like to share your experiences with us anonymously, please email NHSstories@sky.uk

Petrol prices fall to lowest level in nearly a year – but some areas are benefitting more than others | UK News

Petrol has fallen below 150p a litre for the first time since Russia invaded Ukraine last February, new data shows.

The average price at petrol forecourts on Monday morning was 149.7p, according to data from Experian, with some falling as low as 139.9p.

It means the average cost of a litre of unleaded has fallen by 42p from its record high of 191.5p in July, with the AA saying it is “a huge relief for drivers”.

The last time petrol was at a similar level was on 24 February – the same day Russia invaded Ukraine.

Diesel, while not falling at the same rate, has still dropped by 27p from last July, to an average of 172.2p per litre.

Last March, a 5p cut (6p when VAT is considered) to fuel duty was introduced, which is due to expire in two months.

AA fuel price spokesman Luke Bosdet said the “crash in the average pump price of petrol is a huge relief for drivers, cutting £22.99 from the cost of filling the typical car tank”.

‘Rampant exploitation of drivers’

Mr Bosdet said that fuel at 150p a litre is “still historically way above the April 2012 record of 142.48p, the previous yardstick of dire pump prices”.

“Worse still, road fuel is set for a 6p jump in March when the fuel duty cut comes to an end,” he added.

“Indicative of the chaos of UK pump pricing and the rampant exploitation of drivers by many fuel retailers, the AA spotted supermarket and non-supermarket retailers yesterday charging less than 140p a litre in South Wales and Northern Ireland.

“How fuel stations in areas of big populations and high volume sales can charge well over 10p more for fuel than in largely rural parts of the UK is a question that the Competition and Markets Authority will have to address.”

Prices sharply rose during 2022, in part due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but also thanks to wider cost of living-driven issues.

Over the summer, there were protests against the sharp rise in fuel, with some motorways seeing rolling roadblocks over the issue, urging the government to take action.