Search for:
GPS-tagged asylum seeker trial ended with no benefit, Home Office says | UK News

A Home Office pilot scheme involving asylum seekers forced to wear ankle tags to track their locations “did not affect compliance” among them, a government report has concluded.

The trial, launched on 15 June 2022 and concluding on 15 December 2023, involved around 1,200 asylum seekers split into two groups.

Some 600 people were fitted with GPS monitors and told to continue regularly reporting to an immigration reporting centre, which was mostly fortnightly appointments.

The other group – also 600 asylum seekers – were not fitted with electronic tags and had their face-to-face meetings as normal.

Both groups were chosen to be largely young, male and Albanian – the most common profile of asylum seekers during this period.

The findings from the scheme, which have been released for the first time, showed just 16% of the asylum seekers forced to wear electronic monitoring tags absconded and were either unable to be located by the Home Office, had their asylum claim rejected or left the country.

This compared with 14% of the asylum seekers who were not fitted with tags and was deemed a “statistically insignificant” difference by government analysts.

Two-thirds of those tagged either did not keep it charged, a battery breach, or tried to remove it, a strap tamper.

One person had 81 battery breaches – the average per person was six.

The greatest number of strap tampers committed by one person was three but on average was one.

Battery breaches were stated to be mostly accidental – asylum seekers complained the battery was not lasting for as long as advised, and the supplied cable was no long enough for them to sit comfortably while charging the device.

In total, 316 asylum seekers had their tag “ceased” during the pilot – either due to legal or medical challenges or removing their tag and absconding.

One asylum seeker faked a hospital letter saying that the tag was too tight and could no longer be worn.

Read more from Sky News:
Nicola Sturgeon splits from husband
Tyson Fury says he is retiring from boxing
Boris Johnson brands Putin a ‘f****** idiot’

The findings also concluded that asylum seekers hopeful that their claims would be successful were more compliant with Home Office officials, and people receiving asylum support were 79% less likely to stop contact with immigration officials.

In March 2024, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) found the scheme broke data protection laws.

John Edwards, the UK information commissioner said it “was not legally compliant”, calling the GPS tags “highly intrusive” and highlighting that asylum seekers “might not even be aware that they have [privacy and data protection] rights”.

The ICO’s formal warning said any further attempts to monitor asylum seekers would be met with enforcement action.

The Home Office would not confirm how much the scheme cost, or if there were plans to re-run another trial.

Government contract ends for controversial asylum barge Bibby Stockholm | UK News

The government contract for the controversial asylum barge in Dorset has ended.

The last asylum seekers are believed to have left Bibby Stockholm at the end of November after Labour said it would have cost more than £20m to run in 2025.

Its closure this month was expected, and on Friday the management firm and the Home Office confirmed to Sky News the contract had now expired.

It’s currently unclear when Bibby Stockholm will leave Portland and what it will be used for next.

The Conservative government started using the vessel in August 2023.

It said putting nearly 500 men on board while they waited for an asylum decision was cheaper than paying for hotel rooms.

However, it was controversial from the start and sparked legal challenges and protests.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

August: 2023: Barge reminds migrant of Islamic State

Days after the first group boarded there was an outbreak of Legionella bacteria in the water system and it had to be evacuated for two months.

In December 2023, an Albanian asylum seeker, Leonard Farruku, died on board.

Read more from Sky News:
Farage ‘can’t be pushed or bullied’ after Musk rebuke
Zebra dies after ‘incident’ with rhino in Colchester

A Home Office spokesperson said the government was determined to reform the asylum system to make it operate “swiftly, firmly and fairly”.

“This includes our accommodation sites, as we continue to identify a range of options to reduce the use of hotels,” the new statement added.

“We are already closing some hotels and will continue to engage with local authorities and key stakeholders as part of this process.”

At least 270 people have died in UK awaiting asylum application decisions since 2015, figures show | UK News

At least 270 migrants have died in the UK while awaiting a decision on their asylum applications since 2015, figures have revealed.

Home Office data released in response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by Sky News showed the majority of those who died – 171 – were male.

Three of them were teenagers or children.

Migration charities told Sky News the deaths are of people who have often “fled horrors such as war” and “undergone treacherous journeys to seek sanctuary”.

The data is limited to cases where the Home Office has received a notification that the person has died, meaning the true figure could be higher.

Charity Care4Calais said: “These figures confirm what we have known for some time – too many people seeking asylum die waiting for the government to decide their future.

“It’s time the new government not only sped up the decision-making process, but ensured it delivered high-quality decisions that offer people the protection they seek.”

Migrant Help, a UK-based charity supporting people seeking asylum, said: “Every loss of life during the asylum process is a devastating tragedy.

“People who have often escaped unimaginable trauma and undergone treacherous journeys to seek sanctuary in the UK deserve the support and security they need while waiting for their application to be processed.”

The data, extracted in October, runs up to the end of June of this year – the last reportable period in line with published immigration statistics at the time of the FOI.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Watch back: Why immigration isn’t being reduced

Deaths in the English Channel

It comes as Sky News can further reveal following a separate FOI request that 2024 saw as many migrant deaths in the English Channel as the four previous years combined.

While 67 people died up to 8 November this year, 56 people died across 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023.

These were mostly in 2021, with 34 deaths – while there were four deaths in 2022 and 12 in 2023.

The majority of the deaths took place on the French side of the Channel, and as such the figures are not UK government data.

According to data from Migration Watch, a thinktank that monitors migration flows to and from the UK, while 2024 will finish with more small boat crossings than 2023, 2021, and 2020, it will have around 10,000 fewer crossings than 2022.

Charity Refugee Action claimed “hostile border policies” had forced people to take increasingly dangerous routes to reach the UK – like the English Channel – and this “ultimately” led to more people losing their lives.

👉 Tap here to follow the Sky News Daily podcast 👈

Small boat crossings and immigration remain one of the key political topics, as the government battles to control surging numbers post-Brexit.

In an announcement earlier this month, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer outlined a series of milestones to judge his government but didn’t include one on immigration.

This is despite over 20,000 people crossing the Channel in small boats since Labour won the election this summer.

The government has previously said it is targeting smuggling gangs responsible for the crossings.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “Our thoughts and sympathies are with the families and friends of those who have died.

“This government has restarted processing asylum claims which were stuck in an inherited backlog.”

Syrian asylum seeker fears homelessness after claim paused | UK News

From his home in Manchester, Hussam Kassas has been closely following the downfall of the Assad regime.

The 36-year-old Syrian, his wife, son and newborn baby are seeking asylum in Britain.

But the fast-moving events thousands of miles away have led to their asylum claims being paused.

Mr Kassas, who is originally from near Damascus, now fears his family may face homelessness unless the British government reconsiders.

He says, as a young human rights activist in Syria, he was attacked by Assad’s forces.

“I have been targeted by barrel bombs which caused me a serious injuries in my legs,” he recalls.

Latest updates: Syrian leader says Western fears are ‘unnecessary’

Mr Kassas fled the country, crossing into Jordan in 2016, then moving to Turkey with his wife and child.

When their visas there ran out, he applied for student visas in a number of European countries before being granted entry into Britain.

They arrived in August 2023 and applied for asylum weeks later. Since then, they’ve had another baby and continued to wait for a decision on their claim.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The families searching for loved ones in Syria

Now the situation has become critical, with the student visa and his right to work and continue renting their home due to expire next month.

The government’s pause in processing claims means the family is now unlikely to get a decision in time.

“I don’t know if I [will be] able to look [in] my kid’s eye and tell them we are homeless now,” he says in broken English.

“I don’t want to carry my children and my wife to find a temporary hotel or motel to stay in for a while.”

The UK government estimates some 6,500 Syrians currently in the asylum system are affected by the halting of their claims.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Syrian rebel leader says the country isn’t going to get into another war

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper defended the decision, saying “people were claiming asylum from the Assad regime, which is no longer there”.

“So that’s why it’s right, like France and Germany, for us to suspend those asylum decisions,” she continued.

“But we also need to closely monitor what is happening in Syria because there’s so much instability. We don’t know yet how that will play out or what that will mean.”

Read more:
Why the world can’t ignore Syria’s new leader
Concerns grow over fates of detention camps
Why is Israel bombing Syrian airbases?

Mr Kassas says he doesn’t believe Syria is now safe to return to.

“It is not ended by Bashar al Assad leaving Syria because all the officers, all the soldiers, all the security officers that have been controlling the country, all the Baath Party, who was controlling the party, were still and still are now, fully functioning and fully armed,” he said. “I think that a lot of revenge killing will happen.”

Since the Syrian civil war began in 2011, around 44,000 Syrians have been granted asylum in the UK.

With the UK government under increasing pressure to cut migration, the fall of the Assad regime is leading many to question the ongoing need for Syrians to remain in Britain.

Mr Kassas says it is his “dream” to return to his home country one day – but only if he deems it safe.

“If we have a free country where I freely can express my opinion… I [will] do my best to get back to that,” he says.

Additional reporting by Nick Stylianou.

Home Office pauses decisions on Syrian asylum claims following fall of Bashar al Assad | Politics News

The government has paused all decisions on Syrian asylum claims following the rapid fall of the Assad regime over the weekend.

The Home Office said the move had been made “whilst we assess the current situation”.

“The Home Office has paused decisions on Syrian asylum claims whilst we assess the current situation,” a statement said.

“We keep all country guidance relating to asylum claims under constant review so we can respond to emerging issues.”

The move comes after Germany, Greece and Austria also paused asylum applications for thousands of Syrians.

The war in Syria had forced millions of people to flee the country, with the majority heading to Turkey and other neighbouring nations.

Home Office statistics show Syrians generated the fifth largest amount of asylum claims in the year ending September 2024 – behind Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran and Bangladesh.

Politics latest: UK ‘intensely focused’ on Syrian transition amid fears of IS resurgence

Some 99% of claims were granted at initial decision.

Earlier today Sir Keir Starmer announced a further £11m in humanitarian aid for the most vulnerable in Syria, including the hundreds of thousands who have been displaced in the conflict.

In the Commons today, Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, asked her counterpart David Lammy whether the government could ensure there will be “no asylum claims from former members of the Assad regime in this country”.

She told MPs: “The Conservative government called for President Assad to go over a decade ago, and few will shed any tears at this vile tyrant’s removal from office.

“While Assad may have sought sanctuary in Russia, we look to the foreign secretary to explain what steps will be taken to gather evidence of the crimes his reprehensible regime is responsible for, and the actions being taken to bring him to face justice.

“Can he confirm that despite Assad fleeing to Russia to claim asylum, there will be no asylum claims from former members of the Assad regime in this country, many of whom will be associated with human rights abuses?”

Europe debates what to do about Syrian refugees

Elsewhere in Europe today, the German interior ministry announced all asylum applications from Syrian nationals would be put on hold until there was more clarity on the political situation in the war-torn nation.

That impacts around 47,000 people, according to DPA news agency. Even before the official announcement, politicians of various stripes were jostling to make their views on asylum clear.

Some senior leaders of Germany’s opposition, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), suggested encouraging Syrians to return home, drawing criticism from politicians from the chancellor’s party who said it was inappropriate to be having a domestic debate a day and a half after the Assad regime fell.

A snap election is expected early next year with the conservative CDU and far-right Alternative for Germany party (AfD) projected to get the most votes.

A poll on Friday showed that migration is the second-biggest worry for Germans.

In neighbouring Austria, where a backlash against an influx of refugees continues to fuel far-right and conservative parties, the caretaker government ordered a halt to processing Syrian asylum applications.”

Family reunification, a policy where refugees families can join them, is also on hold.

Mr Lammy said it was “premature” to discuss resettlement schemes for Syrian refugees and that the government was working to record human rights offences carried out by the Assad regime.

“We have not got a diplomatic presence in Syria at this time, and indeed, the Syrians do not have a diplomatic presence here in the UK.

“So recording these actions is not straightforward, but of course, we continue to work, as she would expect, with NGOs and civil society to support them in their efforts.”

He added: “She raises the issue of Syrian resettlement. Let me just say that that is premature. This House, on a cross-party basis, has sought to support the humanitarian needs of Syrians.

“We recognise the displacement next door in Lebanon, in Jordan, in Turkey and in Iraq and neighbouring countries, and of course, we will continue to support people in those refugee camps and through the humanitarian aid that we support in the country at this time.”

The successful offensive against the Assad regime that culminated in its downfall was led by Hayat Tahrir al Sham (HTS), a Syrian rebel group, that is currently proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the UK government.

Bashar al Assad, who took over from his father to rule Syria for 24 years, fled to Russia after the events of the weekend and is reportedly now in Moscow.

Read more:
Who are the different rebel groups in Syria?

Rebels storming Assad’s palace find luxury car collection

Alongside the US and other Western allies, the UK is currently considering whether to remove HTS from its proscribed list of terrorist organisations.

HTS used to be a wing of al Qaeda known as the Nusra Front and has long been designated a terrorist group by the US, UK and Russia.

Its founder, Abu Mohammed al Jolani, cut ties with al Qaeda in 2016 in an effort to appear moderate and in 2021 he said he had no desire to wage war against Western countries.

The prime minister has said it is “too early” to decide whether to remove HTS from the list and that “no decision is pending on this”.

He was echoed by Mr Lammy, who said the government would “judge HTS by their actions”.

First failed asylum seeker sent from UK to Rwanda on voluntary scheme | Politics News

The UK has sent the first failed asylum seeker to Rwanda – under a voluntary scheme.

The scheme is for those who have gone through the asylum process and had permission rejected, rather than for migrants who have illegally entered Britain by crossing the Channel on small boats.

The migrant was sent on a commercial flight and handed a fee from the British taxpayer to help relocate under the terms of a deal with Rwanda.

Politics latest: Potential SNP contender hints she will stand

According to The Sun, the man of African origin claimed asylum in the UK but was rejected at the end of last year. He then accepted the offer to go to Rwanda.

He left the UK on Monday.

This was not under done using the powers set out in the Safety of Rwanda Act, but rather a parallel scheme that allows someone to choose to make the trip if their attempts to claim asylum in the UK fails.

And upon arrival in Kigali, the person is able to claim around £3,000 in UK taxpayer money as help.

Yvette Cooper, Labour’s shadow home secretary, said: “The Tories are so desperate to get any flight off to Rwanda before the local elections that they have now just paid someone to go.

“British taxpayers aren’t just forking out £3,000 for a volunteer to board a plane, they are also paying Rwanda to provide him with free board and lodgings for the next five years. This extortionate pre-election gimmick is likely to be costing on average £2m per person.

“Former Tory Home Office ministers warned that the government’s plan was just to get token flights off before a General Election. Now we know what they mean.”

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Former UKIP leader Nigel Farage said: “Don’t be conned by this new government spin on the Rwanda deal.

“This African man, who did not even cross the Channel, was refused asylum and has voluntarily accepted £3,000 and free board.

“It won’t stop the boats.”

The government’s attempts to forcefully remove people to Rwanda were announced more than two years ago, but no one has been sent so far.

👉 Listen above then tap here to follow the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts 👈

Earlier this month, parliament passed the Safety of Rwanda Act, and the government hopes to get flights off the ground in nine to 11 weeks.

The Home Office has been approached for comment.

Home Office accused of ‘celebrating failure’ as it vows to close 150 asylum hotels by May | Politics News

The Home Office has promised to close 150 migrant hotels by May after figures showed aid spending on asylum seekers in the UK rose to £4.3bn in 2023.

The department said the number of people staying in taxpayer-funded accommodation had dropped from 56,000 in September to fewer than 20,000 people currently as part of a drive to end the “damaging” practice.

Approximately £8m a day was spent housing thousands of asylum seekers in hotels last year, prompting the government to seek out alternative accommodation sites, including the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, and disused military bases at Scampton in Lincolnshire and Wethersfield in Essex.

Former immigration minister Robert Jenrick, who resigned over Rishi Sunak’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, announced last October that the government would be “exiting” 50 hotels by the end of January, with more to follow.

Home Secretary James Cleverly said the process would continue “until the last hotel is closed”.

“We promised to end the use of asylum hotels and house asylum seekers at more appropriate, cheaper accommodation; we are doing that at a rapid pace,” he said.

Politics latest: Starmer’s wife ‘intimidated’ by protest at family home – as Labour suspends candidate

“These closures deliver on the government’s plan to cut the use of hotels in the asylum system and we will keep going until the last hotel is closed.”

But Labour’s shadow immigration minister Stephen Kinnock said the announcement amounted to the Conservatives “celebrating failure”.

“So-called ‘asylum hotels’ didn’t exist before the Tories lost control of the asylum backlog, and Rishi Sunak promised to end them by the end of 2023,” he said. “Yet here we are with around 250 still in use come mid-April.”

The Home Office announcement followed findings from the Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) which said the amount of aid spent on hosting refugees and asylum seekers in the UK soared last year to £4.3 billion.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s Becky Johnson reports from one of the 50 asylum hotels that the government says are about to close – but the migrants there are simply moving to another one.

The ICAI said the figure was driven up by the Home Office paying out £2.5bn on hotel accommodation for the year, saying it had “continuing value for money concerns” over the department’s spending.

“Far from reducing as the costs of schemes for Ukrainian and Afghan refugees fell, the amount of aid spent within the UK was driven up further by the Home Office’s spending on hotel accommodation for asylum seekers,” the watchdog said.

Last month, a report by spending watchdog the National Audit Office (NAO) found that the government’s alternative plans for housing asylum seekers will actually cost the taxpayer £46m more than the hotels they seek to replace.

Read more:
Sex offender allowed to stay in UK – as more than half of appeals against asylum decisions successful

Rwanda scheme: PM Rishi Sunak refuses to name date for first deportation flight

The Home Office is expected to have spent at least £230m developing four major projects at the end of March – the Bibby Stockholm barge, the former RAF bases and ex-student accommodation in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire.

But the NAO found that only two of the sites have opened so far – the Bibby Stockholm and the Wethersfield site – and they were only housing around 900 people by the end of January.

Both have suffered a number of setbacks, including an outbreak of Legionella on the barge in the days after it took its first asylum seekers, while, according to the NAO, the set-up costs for Wethersfield have risen from £5m to £49m.

Next week, MPs are expected to vote on amendments to the Safety Of Rwanda Bill, which aims to declare Rwanda a safe country to deport asylum seekers to. It effectively aims to circumvent the Supreme Court’s ruling last year that the policy of sending people who had arrived in the UK illegally to the African country is unlawful.

How asylum seekers being moved out of taxpayer-funded hotels are simply being moved to other hotels | UK News

Asylum seekers being moved out of taxpayer-funded hotels are simply being moved to other hotels still paid for by the Home Office, Sky News has learned.

The Home Office says it has already closed 50 hotels to migrants, something they had pledged to do by the end of this month with a promise to house them in cheaper types of accommodation like the Bibby Stockholm barge.

But Sky News has seen taxis full of migrants leaving one hotel in Kidderminster, Worcestershire, only to arrive at another hotel 70 miles away in Derbyshire.

One asylum seeker from Afghanistan, who we’re calling Khan, 19, arrived on a small boat in early June 2022. He will now be unable to continue attending college, where he was studying English and GCSE Maths, as his new hotel is too far away.

He states he had no choice but to move. “The hotel tell us that if you cancel this process you must sleep on the road like a homeless [person],” he says.

Migrants being moved from the hotel in Bewdley
Image:
Migrants being moved from now-closed hotel in Bewdley

Khan came to the UK because his family worked for the Afghan government so he no longer felt safe after the Taliban takeover of the country in 2021.

Due to the length of time he’s been waiting for a decision his asylum claim is part of the “legacy” backlog that Rishi Sunak pledged to “abolish” by the end of 2022.

The Home Office said the pledge had been “delivered”, having processed more than 112,000 asylum claims overall in 2023.

It means Khan had expected by now to not still be living in taxpayer-funded accommodation.

“I am also not happy to stay in hotel accommodation because I want to work. I want to start a new life and I cannot do something right now… just sleep and eat,” he says.

He currently has a solicitor chasing the Home Office for a decision on his claim.

“Up to now no-one gave me a response, up to December when I emailed them they told us wait up to the end of the year – now the new year start and when we email them, no-one responds.”

Khan came to the UK because he no longer felt safe after the Taliban  takeover of Afghanistan
Image:
Khan came to the UK because he no longer felt safe after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan

A group of residents who offer support to people seeking asylum has been tracking the movements of these hotel closures over recent months.

Sarah Frost, lead co-ordinator from Wyre Forest Supports Asylum Seekers, told Sky News: “We’ve got four from here who got moved from a hotel that was closing just before Christmas.

“They got moved here, and now they’re moving on to another hotel. So some people have been in five or six hotels in a matter of six months or so.”

She adds: “I suppose [the Home Office is] consolidating hotels but obviously it still costs to feed the person…I can’t see how it’s really saving money because taxi fares from Derbyshire to Worcestershire is going to cost a lot of money.”

Another hotel in Bewdley, Worcestershire, was closed last week, but Sky News has been told the men were sent to three different hotels further north.

Read more:
Starmer attacks PM’s ‘farce’ Rwanda bill
SNP’s tactics on Rwanda bill could mean late night for MPs
Migrants seen trying to cross Channel as MPs debate bill

Hallo was sent by taxi with eight other men to a hotel in Staffordshire
Image:
Hallo believes the moves are due to the upcoming election

Hallo, not his real name, 31, from Iraq was sent by taxi with eight other men to a hotel in Staffordshire.

“It’s just shifting around, just switching…just wasting money”, he says. “I think it’s just because of the next election so they want to tell the native people we sorted out the hotels, the cases, the backlog cases.”

The closure of hotels has also affected families. Near Bromsgrove in Worcestershire, the curtains are shut and children’s scooters have been abandoned outside a hotel that was recently closed to migrants.

Sky News has been told that children have lost school places because they were moved suddenly to another county.

The Home Office told Sky News it is making significant progress to reduce the cost of £8.2m a day to UK taxpayers.

A spokesperson said: “As we exit more hotels in the coming months, we remain upfront about accommodation being on a no-choice basis. This means that individuals may be moved to other parts of the asylum accommodation estate too, including hotels.”

Stats watchdog launches investigation into government’s asylum backlog claim | Politics News

The UK’s stats watchdog has launched an investigation into the government’s claim that it cleared the legacy backlog of asylum claims in 2023.

Rishi Sunak and his administration faced criticism on Tuesday for saying they had cleared all the applications to remain in the UK by asylum seekers made before 28 June 2022.

In total, 4,537 claims from the backlog still needed a decision as of Tuesday – but Mr Sunak’s spokesman said since these had been reviewed, the government considers them “cleared”.

Now, the Office for Statistics Regulation has launched an investigation into the announcement.

In total, the government had 92,000 claims to address from before June 2022 to meet the pledge made by Mr Sunak.

Numbers published by the Home Office showed that, in total, 112,138 initial asylum decisions were made between 1 January and 28 December, compared with 31,766 in all of 2022.

Some 86,800 of these decisions were for legacy cases, while, 25,338 were for non-legacy cases.

In total, 51,469 asylum applications were granted, while 25,550 were refused – meaning 67% were accepted. But it also means that 35,119 “non-substantive” decisions were made.

According to the Home Office, this is where the government withdraws the claim, it is paused, declared void or the applicant failed to complete a part of the application.

The 35,119 figure is more than two and a half times the 13,093 examples of non-substantive claims recorded in 2022.

The government has said that the remaining 4,537 more complex cases typically involve “asylum seekers presenting as children – where age verification is taking place; those with serious medical issues; or those with suspected past convictions, where checks may reveal criminality that would bar asylum”.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive Breaking News alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News App. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Downing Street insists legacy asylum claims cleared – despite 4,537 remaining to be decided | Politics News

Downing Street has insisted that the prime minister has achieved his target of clearing the legacy backlog of asylum claims, despite the government’s own data showing that 4,537 remain.

Rishi Sunak pledged in December 2022 that he would “abolish” the legacy backlog of asylum claims made before 28 June of that year, with the Home Office being given the target of the end of 2023.

On Monday, the department said the pledge had been “delivered”, having processed more than 112,000 asylum claims overall in 2023.

There were more than 92,000 asylum claims made before 28 June 2022 requiring a decision, but 4,537 remain, according to the government’s official data.

Analysis: Sunak's asylum backlog claim isn't true - according to the government's own statistics

Analysis: Sunak’s asylum backlog claim isn’t true – according to the government’s own statistics

It seems the government has shot itself in the foot by misleadingly focusing on a specific promise made by the PM which hasn’t quite been met.

Read here

Speaking to journalists this morning, the prime minister’s spokesperson said the legacy backlog of asylum claims has, in fact, been cleared as promised because all cases have been reviewed, and the remaining ones simply “require additional work”.

The spokesperson said: “We committed to clearing the backlog, that is what the government has done. We are being very transparent about what that entails.

“We have processed all of those cases and indeed gone further than the original commitment. We’re up to 112,000 decisions made overall.

“As a result of that process, there are a small minority of cases which are complex and which, because of our rigorous standards, require further work.

“But nonetheless, it is a significant piece of work by Home Office officials to process such huge numbers in a short period of time while retaining our rigorous safety standard.”

The government has said that the remaining 4,537 more complex cases typically involve “asylum seekers presenting as children – where age verification is taking place; those with serious medical issues; or those with suspected past convictions, where checks may reveal criminality that would bar asylum”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Home Secretary discusses government’s work to process asylum claims

However, the CEO of the Refugee Council, Enver Solomon, said it is “misleading for the government to claim that the legacy backlog has been cleared as there are thousands still waiting for a decision”.

And Labour’s shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper labelled the claim that the backlog has been cleared “totally false”.

She told broadcasters: “They made a whole series of promises about clearing the asylum backlog and they haven’t delivered them.

“Instead, the asylum backlog is still nearly 100,000 cases, and we’ve still got thousands of people, record numbers of people in asylum hotels. So, the government’s just failing on all counts.”

The policy is central to government plans to stop small boat crossings
Image:
Rishi Sunak’s spokesperson has rejected accusations that the government has made “misleading” claims

The prime minister’s spokesperson was also asked about an apparent suggestion from Home Secretary James Cleverly on LBC radio this morning that the government’s goal is to stop small boat crossings entirely in 2024.

Downing Street said they are “not going to set out a deadline”, but said the Rwanda bill – that is due to return to the Commons “this month” – is a “key part” of stopping small boat crossings.

Mr Cleverly did not make the suggestion that boats would be stopped this year elsewhere, and a source close to him said: “Tackling illegal migration is by virtue of what it is, a product of criminal people smuggling gangs, should always be a mission to zero, and as quickly as possible.

“We’ll do what it takes, using a whole range of tactics to get to zero to break the business model of these ruthless smugglers who don’t care if people live or die, just as long as they pay.”

It comes after Mr Sunak admitted to parliament’s liaison committee just before Christmas there is no “firm date” to stop small boat crossings entirely.

Up until today, there had been fears for months that the prime minister’s target would not be achieved, and in an appearance before the Commons Liaison Committee in December, the prime minister was unable to say when the remaining overall backlog of asylum claims would be cleared.

In February last year, the Home Office said thousands of asylum seekers would be sent questionnaires which could be used to speed up a decision on their claims, and about 12,000 people from Afghanistan, Syria, Eritrea, Libya and Yemen, who had applied for asylum in the UK and were waiting for a decision, were understood to be eligible under the policy.

In June, the National Audit Office (NAO) said efforts to clear the backlog needed to significantly increase to clear the backlog and questioned whether the plans were sustainable.

Read more:
Sunak says there is no ‘firm date’ to ‘stop the boats’
The election year dawns – and small boats are a key battle line
New restrictions on overseas students bringing family to UK come into force

The spending watchdog also estimated £3.6bn was spent on asylum support in 2022-23, which amounted to almost double the previous year.

More caseworkers had been tasked with processing applications, which the Home Office has previously said was “tripling productivity to ensure more illegal migrants are returned to their country of origin, quicker”.

But the department’s top civil servant, Sir Matthew Rycroft, revealed in a letter to MPs that just 1,182 migrants who had crossed the Channel had been returned to their home country since 2020, out of a total of more than 111,800 who arrived in that time period.

The majority of those returned were from Albania, with whom the UK has a returns agreement.