Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
Energy price cap to rise in October amid backlash over loss of some winter fuel payments | Business News

The energy price cap will rise to an average annual £1,717 from October, the industry regulator has confirmed as the clock ticks down to the loss of winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners.

The new figure represents a 10% a year – or £12 per month – leap in the typical sum households face paying for gas and electricity when using direct debit.

Ofgem said that the rise was largely due to higher wholesale gas prices and it urged bill-payers to “shop around” as there are fixed rate deals on the market that could offer savings.

Money latest: Warning £2,500 will be added to stamp duty ‘overnight’

Its decision means the cap, which is adjusted every three months and limits what suppliers can charge per unit of energy, will remain around £500 up on the average annual bill levels seen before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

It is, however, set to be £117 lower than the October 2023 level.

That gap may partly explain why chancellor Rachel Reeves likely opted to end winter fuel payments – worth up to £300 annually – for around 10 million pensioners not in receipt of means-tested benefits including pension credit.

She blamed the measure, revealed last month, on the need to help plug a “black hole” in the public finances left by the Conservatives but has faced a widespread backlash including from within Labour’s own ranks.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Cuts to pensioners’ winter fuel payments

Charities warn that heating costs remain punitive and a key plank of the continuing cost of living crisis that will force many to choose between heating and eating this winter.

Research by Citizens Advice suggests one in four could be forced to turn off their heating and hot water amid record levels of energy debt.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband admitted the rise in the cap was “deeply worrying” but defended the cuts.

“The truth is that the mess that was left to us in the public finances is what necessitated that decision around winter fuel payment and us focusing it on those who need it the very most.

“That’s why this government is also driving throughout the coming months to get the people, the 880,000 pensioners who are entitled to pension credit and not getting it to try and get them to take it up, to make them aware of this so they can get the winter fuel payment as well.”

An updated forecast issued by the energy research consultancy Cornwall Insight predicted a further 3% hike in the cap during the peak use months of January-March to £1,762.

SHOULD I TAKE A FIXED DEAL?

Cast your mind back to before the COVID pandemic and you will remember that a reluctance among households to switch suppliers helped give birth to the energy price cap.

The majority of homes were on so-called default tariffs – sometimes through no choice of their own – but those able to choose and the more financially savvy had a fixed rate deal, often changing their supplier once a year to bring down their bills.

But they largely disappeared from view after dozens of suppliers collapsed amid a series of cost shocks, latterly caused by the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, forcing the bulk of households to hunker down and rely on the price cap.

It certainly is not perfect and is ripe for reform, as Ofgem has suggested again today.

A feature of the energy market this year has been the return of fixed rate deals.

They are fewer in number but can offer certainty on what you will pay over the term of the deal.

Ofgem figures show that around one million more households have taken that opportunity since April, bringing the total to five million.

Are they worth it? Is it too late?

The price comparison site Uswitch claimed today that savings of about £125 on the October price cap level are out there.

Emily Seymour, the energy editor at consumer group Which?, cautioned: “As a rule of thumb, we’d recommend looking for deals around the price of the current price cap, not longer than 12 months and without significant exit fees.”

Ofgem chief executive Jonathan Brearley said: “We know that this rise in the price cap is going to be extremely difficult for many households. Anyone who is struggling to pay their bill should make sure they have access to all the benefits they are entitled to, particularly pension credit, and contact their energy company for further help and support.

“I’d also encourage people to shop around and consider fixing if there is a tariff that’s right for you – there are options available that could save you money, while also offering the security of a rate that won’t change for a fixed period.

“We are working with government, suppliers, charities and consumer groups to do everything we can to support customers, including longer term standing charge reform, and steps to tackle debt and affordability.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What is GB Energy and what will it do?

“Options such as changing how standing charges are paid and getting suppliers to offer more tariff choices and give customers more control are all on the table, but there are no silver bullets.

“Any change could leave some low-income households worse off, so it’s important we hear views on our proposals and continue working with the government to see what targeted support could help customers.

“Ultimately the price rise we are announcing today is driven by our reliance on a volatile global gas market that is too easily influenced by unforeseen international events and the actions of aggressive states. Building a homegrown renewable energy system is the key to lowering bills and creating a sustainable and secure market that works for customers.”

The government’s energy strategy includes measures to eradicate the country’s dependence on natural gas for heating and electricity through a greater commitment to wind power, including onshore.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer confident over lower bills

The hope is for lower bills in the future.

Jess Ralston, head of energy at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit said: “A lack of progress on energy efficiency and heat pumps means that our reliance on gas hasn’t fallen much in recent years, despite the volatility in the international markets forcing bills to skyrocket.

“The new government has made steps on renewables, but not confirmed its plans for home heating or insulation yet, and there is clearly no time to waste.

“Unless we start to reduce our demand for gas, we will only see our dependence on foreign imports rise. Oil and gas from the North Sea is sold on international markets to the highest bidder so doesn’t help with our bills or energy independence.

“With the removal of the winter fuel payment for some pensioners at the same time as bills going up, it’s likely that some will struggle and it remains to be seen if the government will bring in measures to support those worst hit by the removal of winter fuel payment.”

Radio 1’s Greg James apologises ‘unreservedly’ after backlash over glass eye comment | Ents & Arts News

Radio 1 DJ Greg James has apologised after being called out for negative representations of disability in a video to promote his latest children’s book.

James and co-author Chris Smith, who write the popular Kid Normal series together, appeared in a now-removed promotional video for a new version of Roald Dahl’s famous book The Twits on Friday.

In the clip, the pair can be seen looking over the shoulders of illustrator Emily Jones as she works on their yet-to-be-revealed lead characters.

The trio could be seen discussing ways to make the duo “more revolting” and when Ms Jones suggested a glass eye, James could be seen nodding as Smith replied: “That’s it. What a disgusting pair of Twits!”

The exchange was soon criticised by charities including Scope and the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB).

James responded to the criticism in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, as he wrote: “We are so sorry to have caused offence with the launch video.

“It was absolutely not our intention. And we apologise unreservedly. It’s now gone.

“We understand that words matter and we pride ourselves on championing and welcoming everyone into the magical world of children’s books.

“We would never dream of deliberately setting out to exclude anyone.”

The 38-year-old DJ added that he and Smith had been “attempting to pay homage to one of the Twit’s most famous pranks involving a glass of beer in order to remind people of Dahl’s infamous terrible two”.

“It’s in no way a suggestion that this forms any part of the plot of the new story nor was it our intention to suggest that it was in any way disgusting,” he wrote.

“It’s unfortunate that the word disgusting appears to be a direct comment on that. That’s an error on our part.

“We are devastated that it’s come across like this but completely understand why there is anger.”

James and Smith’s book, The Twits Next Door, is part of a new series of books featuring characters created by the late Dahl.

Although the video has been removed, the chief executive of national disability charity Sense said it still had “concerns”.

More from Sky News:
Legendary rockers sell music to Abba hologram company
Is ‘H’ from Steps really getting a statue?

Richard Kramer said: “We remain concerned however that the book, scheduled for release later in the year, will contain a character with a disability to show, in the words of the video, how ‘disgusting’ they are.

“It’s 2024 and to be promoting such a negative representation of disability is wrong. Disability is not a character flaw.”

The Press Association has approached Puffin Books and the Roald Dahl Company for comment.

Mary Earps replica goalkeeper shirt to be sold by Nike after backlash | UK News

A limited number of replica Mary Earps goalshirts are finally being made available to buy by Nike.

The England women’s team’s home and away kits have been available for fans to buy from Nike since earlier this year, however, Earps’ goalkeeper kits had not been put up for sale.

The manufacturer has faced pressure to stock the replica shirts, with more than 73,000 people signing a petition.

“We’ve seen and share the unprecedented passion and interest in women’s football this year and remain committed to playing our part by offering the best products and services to athletes and fans,” Nike said in a statement.

“We invested more in this year’s WC [World Cup] than any other global tournament to date.

“Nike has secured limited quantities of goalkeeper jerseys for England, US, France, and the Netherlands to be sold through the Federation websites over the coming days, and we are also in conversations with our other Federation partners.

“We recognise that during the tournament we didn’t serve those fans who wished to show their passion and support to the squad’s goalkeepers. We are committed to retailing women’s goalkeeping jerseys for major tournaments in the future.”

Soccer Football - FIFA Women's World Cup Australia and New Zealand 2023 - Final - Spain v England - Stadium Australia, Sydney, Australia - August 20, 2023 England's Mary Earps saves a penalty from Spain's Jennifer Hermoso REUTERS/Carl Recine
Image:
Earps saved a penalty in the World Cup final

Nike has yet to confirm how many shirts will be available or when they’ll be on sale.

Earps spoke out on the controversy earlier this week when Nike issued a statement saying they were “committed to women’s football” despite the fact the shirts weren’t on sale.

“We hear and understand the desire for a retail version of a goalkeeper jersey and we are working towards solutions for future tournaments,” the manufacturer had said.

Earps, 30, responded on Instagram: “@Nike, is this your version of an apology/taking accountability /a powerful statement of intent?”.

Prior to the World Cup, Earps said that the lack of a replica shirt represented a “scary message being sent to goalkeepers worldwide that you are not important”.

Read more:
FA boss faces disciplinary proceedings over unwanted kiss
Lionesses’ online popularity climbs

She added: “[Kids] are going to say ‘Mum, dad, can I have a Mary Earps shirt?’ And they’ll say, ‘I can’t, but I can get you an Alessia Russo 23, or a Rachel Daly 9.’

“And so what you are saying is that goalkeeping isn’t important, but you can be a striker if you want.”

Earps played in every minute of England’s World Cup games and heroically saved a penalty in the final against Spain.

She was awarded the goalkeeper of the tournament award, the golden glove.

Bouncy castle ban reversed by council after backlash | UK News

A Scots council has reversed its ban on bouncy castles following a backlash.

Highland Council put a “regrettable pause” on the hiring of inflatables across its vast estate amid health and safety concerns.

The council claimed the region’s size made it difficult for staff to get to its many venues – including more than 200 schools – to carry out thorough risk assessments and quality checks.

The decision was made to “safeguard attendees” until structures were in place to meet the requirements.

It was hoped that families attending upcoming fairs would “enjoy the day with the other activities on offer”.

However, bosses reversed the decision on Wednesday after councillors were called into action following concerns raised by businesses and locals.

Inverness-based Mascot Madness Entertainment was one of the firms calling on the council to fully explain its decision.

Announcing the U-turn, a Highland Council spokesperson said: “The council has had further discussions about the health and safety requirements of inflatable lets bookings at its properties.

“The council’s approach seeks to balance the mitigation of risk with acting in a way that does not impact unnecessarily on community activities.

“Consequently, the council can confirm that new conditions of let requirements have been produced for the safe use of inflatable devices on council and High Life Highland premises.”

Read more:
Highland Council vows to take action over ‘dangerous’ potholes

The updated conditions will allow the council to ensure the inflatables meet all required safety standards; that operators and contractors can show they have carried out appropriate risk assessments; and that they hold the appropriate insurance to cover any risk to users or any other risks that may arise from them being used on council premises.

The council spokesperson added: “With these assurances in place, the council will be able to permit appropriate contractors to fulfil these bookings on Highland Council and High Life Highland operated lets on facilities owned by the council.”

Councillor Isabelle MacKenzie said she was “delighted” with the decision.

She said: “A number of school events this summer would have been a bit deflated.

“Having spent many years involved with parent council events, much needed funds are raised for schools. Bouncy castles are a huge treat for kids.”

The Guardian pulls cartoon of outgoing BBC boss Richard Sharp after antisemitism backlash | Politics News

A controversial cartoon of outgoing BBC chairman Richard Sharp has been taken down by a national newspaper after being widely condemned as antisemitic.

In the face of a fierce backlash, The Guardian has apologised and removed Martin Rowson’s drawing posted on its website as it “did not meet our editorial standards”.

Also apologising, Mr Rowson said through “carelessness and thoughtlessness I screwed up pretty badly”.

Critics argued the depiction of Mr Sharp, who is Jewish, would not have looked out of place in Nazi-era propaganda sheets.

There has been condemnation of the caricature
Image:
There has been condemnation of the ‘deeply depressing’ caricature. Pic: Guardian

The row comes after Mr Sharp resigned from the top BBC job on Friday after being found to have broken the rules by failing to disclose he played a role in getting the then prime minister Boris Johnson an £800,000 loan guarantee.

The cartoon showed a heavily-featured Mr Sharp departing with a box marked Goldman Sachs, the investment bank where he used to work, containing a squid and what appears to be a puppet of Rishi Sunak.

The Jewish “puppet master”, secretly controlling the economic and political world order, has been a long-standing narrative and antisemitic trope used by conspiracy theorists.

Next to Mr Sharp, sitting on a pile of dung is a naked Mr Johnson, shouting to him: “Cheer up matey. I put you down for a peerage in my resignation honours list.”

Author Dave Rich, who has written on antisemitism, wrote on Twitter the cartoon “falls squarely into an antisemitic tradition of depicting Jews with outsized, grotesque features, often in conjunction with money and power”.

He pointed out such caricatures had been used by both the Nazis and in the Soviet Union.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Richard Sharp’s resignation in full

Highlighting the symbolism within the cartoon, on the squid, Mr Rich said: “Yes, Sharp worked for Goldman Sachs, which was famously described in @RollingStone as ‘a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money'”.

But he added: “The problem is that a squid or octopus is also a common antisemitic motif, used to depict a supposed Jewish conspiracy with its tentacles wrapped around whatever parts of society the Jews supposedly control. Especially money. Are those gold coins in the box with Sharp’s squid?”

He added: “Is it possible that a cartoonist as experienced as @MartinRowson is unaware of these common antisemitic traditions (plus whoever else at the Guardian saw it)?

“Or perhaps this just another case of assumptions about Jews, money and power that are so familiar, people don’t notice them.”

He went on: “The physical characteristics given to Sharp in the cartoon – the nose, lips etc – are racial characteristics. Antisemitism can be racism. Just in case anyone was still unsure about that.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Johnson has nothing to say on Sharp

Read more:
Analysis: Damage to the BBC has already been done

Diane Abbott suspended as Labour MP after suggesting Jews don’t face racism

Former Labour MP Ian Austin, who quit the party under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership over antisemitism and now sits in the Lords, wrote on Twitter: “What an utterly revolting cartoon, full of disgusting antisemitic imagery.

“It looks like something from a far-right Nazi publication but is in fact in @guardian and they should be ashamed of themselves.”

Fellow former Labour MP John Mann, who is also now a peer, said: “Haven’t bought this paper for many years. This is why.

“My parents who bought it every day would be so saddened and angry with those who own and edit it. A paper that chooses not to sort itself out.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Richard Sharp scandal explained

Stephen Pollard, editor-at-large of the Jewish Chronicle, tweeted: “It takes a lot to shock me. And I am well aware of the Guardian’s and especially Rowson’s form. But I still find it genuinely shocking that not a single person looked at this and said, no, we can’t run this. To me that’s the real issue.”

‘Antisemitism should be relentlessly challenged’

Tory former cabinet minister Sajid Javid also wrote on Twitter: “Disappointed to see these tropes in today’s Guardian.

“Disturbing theme – or at best, lessons not learned?”

He linked to a previous Guardian cartoon by Steve Bell 2020, which drew accusations of racism, after depicting then home secretary Priti Patel, who is of Hindu heritage, as a huge bull with horns and a ring through her nose.

Former Northern Ireland secretary Julian Smith said: “The depiction of Richard Sharp in @guardian is deeply depressing.

“Antisemitism should be relentlessly challenged, day in day out. Lots to write about re the report this week, but why this?”

Historian Simon Sebag Montefiore branded it a “repellent explicitly racist cartoon”.

Responding to criticism, The Guardian said in a statement: “We understand the concerns that have been raised.

“This cartoon does not meet our editorial standards, and we have decided to remove it from our website.

“The Guardian apologises to Mr Sharp, to the Jewish community and to anyone offended.”

‘Things go horribly wrong’

Mr Rowson apologised on Twitter. He said: “Through carelessness and thoughtlessness I screwed up pretty badly with a Graun toon today & many people are understandably very upset.

“I genuinely apologise, unconditionally.”

In a longer statement on his website, he added: “Sometimes, like in this case, in the mad rush to cram as much in as possible in the five or so hours available to me to produce the artwork by deadline, things go horribly wrong.”

He continued: “I know Richard Sharp is Jewish; actually, while we’re collecting networks of croneyism, I was at school with him, though I doubt he remembers me.

“His Jewishness never crossed my mind as I drew him as it’s wholly irrelevant to the story or his actions, and it played no conscious role in how I twisted his features according to the standard cartooning playbook.

“Likewise, the cute squid and the little Rishi were no more than that, a cartoon squid and a short Prime Minister, it never occurring to me that some might see them as puppets of Sharp, this being another notorious antisemitic trope.”

SNP candidate Kate Forbes insists she has ‘progressive views’ after gay marriage backlash | Politics News

SNP leadership candidate Kate Forbes has insisted she has “progressive views” after scrutiny of her religious beliefs. 

The Scottish finance secretary lost several supporters in the race to replace Nicola Sturgeon when she admitted she would have voted against gay marriage in Scotland at the time it was made legal almost a decade ago.

She subsequently told Sky News that her faith means having children outside of marriage is “wrong” and something she personally would “seek to avoid”.

Ms Forbes, a member of the Free Church of Scotland, has also voiced opposition to Holyrood’s gender legislation and has failed to fully commit to banning all forms of conversion therapy.

Asked if she considers herself to have progressive views, Ms Forbes told Sky’s Sophy Ridge on Sunday: “I do indeed.

“I think we live in a pluralistic, tolerant society, which allows space for everyone. And of course, the definition of progressivity is that we stand up for those who have no voice and ensure that we are representing their interest in Scotland today.”

Ms Forbes was then pressed on her views on gay and trans conversion therapy, which the Scottish government has committed to ban by the end of the year.

During a Sky News leadership debate last week, Ms Forbes was asked six times if she would end the practice even fro those who consent to it – and did not give a straight answer.

Although she called conversion therapy “abhorrent”, she got tangled up when asked about people who wanted it done to themselves, saying they “should be allowed to live freely as they choose, I do not think there should be conversion therapy in Scotland”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Kate Forbes says she personally believes children outside marriage is wrong

Read more:
Crisis departure signals reset of SNP machine and end of power couple’s grip

Support for Scottish independence at 46%, poll finds

Pressed for clarity on her position on Sunday, she repeated her stance that conversion therapy is “abhorrent” but said “lived experiences” should “inform the approach that we take to the debate”.

“I understand that there are people who will see that there is no non-coercive approach to conversion therapy and I’m not here to try to argue with that,” she said.

“I’m here to build on the experiences that people have shared and ensure that any approach we take to the legislation reflects those lived experiences.

“But it is a very sensitive issue and I do think it is important that rather than give you a sort of quick ‘gotcha’ answer on a matter of such importance that we do reflect on the consultation responses and we ensure the legislation bans such an abhorrent process.”

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

Leadership rival Humza Yousaf has tried to exploit Ms Forbes’ perceived weakness with SNP voters on social issues by suggesting she is “abandoning the progressive agenda” of the party.

‘Stunning level of scrutiny’

Speaking to the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg, Ms Forbes said there has been “quite a stunning level of scrutiny and perhaps backlash from some quarters” around her religious views.

She said other people of faith have held high office in the UK and she vowed to ensure Scotland is a “tolerant and pluralistic nation”.

Addressing the gay community, she added: “I give you an honest pledge today to govern in a way that delivers for you, that does not in any way undermine your rights and actually seeks to enhance your opportunities in Scotland to ensure that Scotland is truly that tolerant and pluralistic nation that we all want to see.”

The interviews were pre-recorded as Ms Forbes does not work on Sundays due to her religion – though she has said she would if she is elected first minister.

She was speaking before the SNP was plunged into turmoil over the weekend as chief executive Peter Murrell, who is married to Nicola Sturgeon, quit after a row over the party’s membership numbers.

His departure came shortly after that of media chief Murray Foote, who said there had been a “serious impediment” to his role.

Ms Forbes, who along with the other candidates had called for the membership numbers to be released, told Sophy Ridge she has “full confidence in the integrity of election contest”.

She said the significant fall in paid-up support to the SNP that the party was forced to confirm, demonstrates that “we do need to focus and deliver change”, adding: “Continuity won’t cut it.”

JK Rowling responds to backlash over ‘anti-trans comments’ – saying: ‘I never set out to upset anyone’ | UK News

JK Rowling has responded to the backlash she received after sharing her views on gender identity, saying she “never set out to upset anyone”.

The 57-year-old is one of the most successful authors of all time – her seven Harry Potter books published between 1997 and 2007 sold more than 500 million copies worldwide.

But she has been criticised for her views on gender identity, which came to light in a number of tweets she published in 2020.

Speaking in a new podcast titled The Witch Trials of JK Rowling, she said: “I never set out to upset anyone.

“However, I was not uncomfortable with getting off my pedestal.”

Among the tweets she had written in June 2020 was one saying: “I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth.”

Rowling, who has always denied accusations of transphobia, told the podcast: “And what has interested me in the last 10 years and certainly in the last few years, particularly on social media: ‘You’ve ruined your legacy, oh you could have been beloved forever but you chose to say this’ and I think you could not have misunderstood me more profoundly.

“I do not walk around my house thinking about my legacy. What a pompous way to live your life – walking around thinking about what my legacy will be. Whatever. I’ll be dead. I care about now. I care about the living.”

Emma Watson, Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint will star in the special. Pic: Warner Bros/Sky
Image:
The film franchise made stars out of Emma Watson, Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint. Pic: Warner Bros/Sky

The author also talked about how her first husband, Jorge Arantes, would hide her unpublished manuscript for the first Harry Potter book to prevent her from leaving him.

The two got married in October 1992 and she left him in November 1993, having already left twice but returned.

Rowling described her marriage to Arantes as “very violent, very controlling”, something that worsened when she became pregnant with their daughter Jessica.

“I’d continue to write. In fact, he knew what that manuscript meant to me because at one point he took the manuscript and hid it and that was his hostage.”

Read more:
The PR attempt to separate JK Rowling from Harry Potter and why it’s important
Emma Watson ‘overwhelmed’ by reuniting with Harry Potter stars Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and others

Customers stand next to Harry Potter books at a bookstore in Beijing August 16, 2007. Chinese students have worked their magic on Harry Potter, translating the latest instalment within hours of release of the English version, state media said

When she decided to leave for the final time, she started to “take a few pages of the manuscript into work every day – just a few pages so that he wouldn’t realise anything was missing – and photocopy it”.

Rowling added: “And gradually in a cupboard in the staff room, bit by bit, a photocopied manuscript grew and grew and grew, because I suspected that if I wasn’t able to get out with everything he would burn it or take it or hold it hostage.

“That manuscript still meant so much to me. That was the thing that I actually prioritised for saving.

“The only thing I prioritised beyond that obviously was my daughter, but at that point she’s still inside me, so she’s as safe as can be in that situation.”

In an interview in 2000, Arantes said that their relationship was “always either in heaven or in hell”.

And speaking to the Daily Mail in 2020, he denied that there was any domestic violence or sexual violence during their time together – but he did admit slapping her.

Rishi Sunak branded ‘total liability’ as he faces backlash from MPs after being handed second police fine | Politics News

Rishi Sunak has been branded a “total liability” and “hapless” as he faced backlash for being fined for a second time, with police handing him a fixed penalty notice over not wearing a seatbelt.

Lancashire Police issued the notice after the prime minister appeared without a belt in a clip on Instagram as he promoted his levelling-up funding in Lancashire.

Mr Sunak has accepted the fine, with Downing Street saying he “fully accepts this was a mistake” and will “of course comply with the fixed penalty”.

Critics are now accusing the PM of showing “the same disregard for rules” as his Number 10 predecessor Boris Johnson.

‘Hapless’ Sunak has photo-op blow up in face, says Labour – politics latest

Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner tweeted: “Rishi Sunak is a total liability.”

Chris Bryant, Labour MP for Rhondda, said: “Sunak promised honesty, integrity and accountability on the steps of Number 10. Not only has he been fined again for breaking the law, but Zahawi has been fined as well. It’s time they all went. It’s time for a general election.”

The Labour Deputy Leader says the Prime Minister "should tell the public" if he's registered with a private GP
Image:
Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner called the PM a ‘total liability’

A Labour spokesperson added: “Hapless Rishi Sunak’s levelling-up photo op has blown up in his face and turned him into a laughing stock.

“He started the week hoping people would be grateful for a partial refund on the money that has been stripped from them over 13 years of the Tories. But instead he got a warring party and yet another fine from the police.”

‘No one is above the law’

Labour MP Cat Smith thanked police for their road safety work before taking a swipe at Mr Sunak by saying “no one is above the law”.

But Tory MP Scott Benton struck a different tone to his fellow Lancashire MP, saying the seatbelt complaint was politically motivated and bad use of police time.

In an apparent bid to downplay the significance of the notice, the Blackpool South MP tweeted: “@LancsPolice do an amazing job, but I’m sure their time is better spent investigating serious crime which impacts on my constituents.

“The vast majority of people would think that politically motivated complaints about a seat belt are not good use of frontline resources.”

Meanwhile, Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: “Rishi Sunak has shown the same disregard for the rules as Boris Johnson, and now becomes the second ever prime minister to be fined by the police.

“From partygate to seatbelt gate, these Conservative politicians are just taking the British people for fools.

“Whilst they continue to behave as though it’s one rule for them and another for everyone else, this fine is a reminder that the Conservatives eventually get their comeuppance.”

The criticism comes as Labour is also calling on Mr Sunak to dismiss Nadhim Zahawi from his cabinet after questions over the Tory chairman’s tax affairs remain unanswered.

Questions have swirled following an article in The Sun on Sunday, which claimed a seven-figure payment was made by Mr Zahawi to end a dispute with the taxman “after scrutiny of his family’s financial affairs”.

Second serving PM to break the law while in office

Mr Sunak is the second serving prime minister – after Boris Johnson – to be found to have broken the law while in office.

The force said: “You will be aware that a video has been circulating on social media showing an individual failing to wear a seatbelt while a passenger in a moving car in Lancashire.

“After looking into this matter, we have today issued a 42-year-old man from London with a conditional offer of fixed penalty.”

Mr Sunak has previously been fined by the Met Police for breaking lockdown rules.

He and Mr Johnson were fined by the Metropolitan Police over a birthday held in Downing Street for the former prime minister when curbs were in place.

Read more:
Analysis: Sunak’s slip-ups give enemies perfect chance to brand him out of touch
PM urged to sack Zahawi over tax claims

Sunak’s slip-ups could be exploited by opponents to brand him out of touch

Political correspondent Joe Pike

Joe Pike

Political correspondent

@joepike

Downing Street will be hoping that once the PM has paid up, voters and journalists will move on and forget this rather embarrassing unforced error.

To Rishi Sunak’s credit, he put his hands up and admitted the error almost immediately.

But it is a reminder that in the top job, with a permacrisis of strikes, NHS delays and high inflation, mistakes can slip through the Number 10 net.

Failing to wear a seatbelt is illegal, but filming it and publishing the evidence on social media suggests a lack of checks within the PM’s team.

This is the second police fine Mr Sunak has received in 9 months, after the Met Police punished him for attending a lockdown-busting birthday gathering for Boris Johnson.

In recent months Mr Sunak has struggled with contactless payments, had an awkward conversation with a homeless man about financial services, and demonstrated a fondness for using private jets to travel around the UK even for relatively short journeys.

Added together, such slip-ups may be exploited by the PM’s enemies to claim he is out of touch.

There is certainly a danger these small missteps distract from Rishi Sunak’s attempts to stabilise the economy and sort out seemingly intractable issues like migrant crossings and delayed discharges.

Like many occupants of Number 11, Rishi Sunak was a ‘submarine chancellor’. Invisible below the waves for months on end, he occasionally rose from the deep to launch a killer economic intervention: his “whatever it takes” COVID budget, the furlough scheme, Eat Out To Help Out.

But as Gordon Brown (the last politician to move from 11 to 10) found, similar manoeuvres are not possible as prime minister.

You are constantly in the spotlight. And it is an unsparing existence.

Law must be applied ‘impartially’

Sky News’ policing analyst Graham Wettone said he is “not surprised” about the notice, adding that it is the “right and proper” resolution.

“It is exactly what would happen to anybody else if they were to commit a similar offence and the police discovered it.”

Mr Wettone dismissed criticism that the prime minister has been treated unfairly, suggesting the case was “fairly simple” and that the law must be applied “impartially”.

Fines of up to £500 can be issued for failing to wear a seatbelt when one is available.

There are a few exemptions, including when a car is being used for police, fire and rescue services, and for certified medical issues.

Mr Sunak came to office promising “integrity” after the scandals that eventually forced Mr Johnson from office.

Mr Sunak’s premiership has been hit with a series of controversies since he entered Number 10 in October, from criticism for reinstating Suella Braverman as home secretary six days after she was forced to step down over a security breach to an ongoing bullying inquiry into Dominic Raab, the deputy prime minister.

Backlash to Braverman builds as foreign secretary defends her re-appointment | Politics News

James Cleverly has defended the re-appointment of Suella Braverman as home secretary, saying she has “a very clear agenda” that the prime minister wants to see delivered.

Ms Braverman resigned from the role seven days ago, having breached the ministerial code by sending secure information from her private email, and left with scathing remarks about Liz Truss’s government.

But she was hired back by new PM Rishi Sunak yesterday as he chose a number of familiar faces to make up his cabinet.

Politics live updates: Sunak’s first PMQs at noon as Braverman backlash grows

Labour attacked the move, accusing Mr Sunak of “putting party before country” by appointing Ms Braverman to win over the right wing of his party.

But Mr Cleverly said she had “very, very clear ideas about how we improve the performance of the Home Office” and had apologised for the mistakes of the past.

“Suella made a mistake,” he told Sky News. “She has said herself that she made a mistake. She’s apologised for that mistake and she stood down at the time.

“She has shown a willingness to take responsibility for what happened – but ultimately [the PM] has decided that he wants to see the agenda that she has set out, that very important crime fighting agenda, back in the heart of government.”

Suella Braverman, who has been appointed Britain's Secretary of State for the Home Department, walks outside Number 10 Downing Street, in London, Britain, October 25, 2022. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls
Image:
Suella Braverman was brought back into her old role by new prime minister Rishi Sunak.

Ms Braverman has made a name for herself in parliament with her strong views on the so-called culture wars, recently attacking the “Guardian-reading, tofu-eating wokerati” .

And she holds firm positions on policy, especially around cutting new migration and her unwavering support for the Rwanda deportation scheme.

Labour’s shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper pointed to Mr Sunak’s speech on the steps of Downing Street after becoming prime minister, saying his government would have “integrity, professionalism and accountability at every level”.

“Yet he has just appointed Suella Braverman to be home secretary again a week after she resigned for breaches of the ministerial code, security lapses, sending sensitive government information through unauthorised personal channels, and following weeks of non-stop public disagreements with other cabinet ministers,” she added.

“Our national security and public safety are too important for this kind of chaos. We don’t just need a new cabinet, we need a general election and a fresh start with Labour.”

Liberal Democrat MP Alistair Carmichael⁩ also claimed Ms Braverman’s appointment “makes a mockery of Rishi Sunak’s claims to be bringing integrity to Number 10”.

He called for an independent inquiry into the hiring, adding: “A home secretary who broke the rules is not fit for a Home Office which keeps the rules.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour’s Yvette Cooper criticises Rishi Sunak’s appointment of Suella Braverman to home secretary, describing it as a

Meanwhile, questions remain over whether the new prime minister will go ahead with the planned economic statement at Halloween, organised in response to the market turmoil caused by Ms Truss’s tax-slashing mini-budget last month.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, who has stayed in post at the Treasury, reversed most of her policies when he came into his role just over a week ago.

But the Commons statement set for 31 October is due to provide longer term plans to fill to fiscal blackhole the government has been left with after Ms Truss’s short tenure, along with a much anticipated forecast from the Office for Budget Responsibility – something that was missing from the mini-budget.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt reversed the majority of Liz Truss’s policies after she appointed him last week.

Foreign Secretary James Cleverly told Sky News this morning he had not had “specific confirmation of dates” and Mr Sunak will “want to take some time to work on the detail” alongside his chancellor.

But he added: “We know it needs to come soon. We know people want certainty.

“We know people want a clear idea of the government’s plans [but] whether it happens exactly on that day, I’m not able to confirm.”

Labour’s shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson said she was “surprised and alarmed” that the Halloween statement could be delayed, and said it showed “never-ending chaos… at the heart of government”.

“We don’t yet fully know the scale of the damage that the Conservatives have cause to our economy,” she told Sky News. “We’ve seen all this chaos and we do need to see those forecasts… as soon as possible.

“Big decisions not being taken and it creates massive problems for our country… that are not being addressed.”