Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
End Right to Buy to help save councils from £2.2bn black hole, government urged | Politics News

Local councils have called on the government to end the Right to Buy scheme for new council homes as they warned no change to council housing funding would end in tragedy.

Following Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner promising a “council housing revolution”, 100 local councils have warned the financial model for council housing finances is “broken”, with a £2.2bn “black hole” in councils’ dedicated budgets expected by 2028.

Follow live politics updates

In a report led by Southwark Council, its leader Kieron Williams said: “Council housing in England stands at a crossroads. Carry on down the path we are on and an ever dwindling number of people will benefit from the transformative impact of a good quality council home. However, that tragedy is not inevitable.

“Without urgent action, councils will be tipped over the edge, as the costs they need to meet to maintain their council homes outstrip the income they have to pay those costs.”

The councils have called for a complete overhaul of the Right to Buy scheme introduced by Margaret Thatcher in 1980 that allows council tenants to buy their council homes at reduced rates.

Ms Rayner, who bought her council house through Right to Buy in 2007, announced at the end of July the government had started to review increased discounts introduced by the former Conservative government in 2012 and will begin a consultation into the whole scheme this autumn.

Only 4% of homes bought under Right to Buy have been replaced, according to charity Shelter, while an estimated 43% of households living in private rented accommodation and receiving housing benefits are in homes bought under Right to Buy.

Screengrab Angela Rayner
Image:
Angela Rayner said in July the government was reviewing the scheme

Tenants can currently get a discount of £75,000 outside London and £100,000 in London but the report calls for those discounts to be reduced and to be “more sensitive to geographic differences”.

They also want the government to ensure the sale of council houses under the scheme is “sufficient” for councils to replace homes sold to meet local housing needs.

Councils should also be allowed to keep 100% of Right to Buy receipts to deliver new or replacement social rent homes within 10 years, they said.

When it comes to newly built council homes, the group wants a complete block on them being purchased through Right to Buy.

And they want Right to Buy eligibility to be extended so buyers will have had to be a public sector tenant for at least 10 years instead of the current three.

The councils also want those planning to use Right to Buy to have new financial health checks to ensure they can afford the ongoing costs of owning a home.

Read more:
Spending on temporary accommodation for homeless people soars

Which council tax rises could the government introduce in budget?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Housing reforms cause divisions

Also in the report, the councils said the previous government did not honour a 10-year deal agreed in 2012 that would have guaranteed rental incomes and costs were predictable.

They argue that despite being expected to “deliver on their side of the agreement”, policy changes by the government imposed new costs on councils and restricted crucial income.

They are calling for an emergency capital funding injection of £644m, which they say is equal to the income lost from council rents being capped from 2023-25.

👉 Tap here to follow Politics at Jack and Sam’s wherever you get your podcasts 👈

A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesman said: “We are facing the most acute housing crisis in living memory and that is why we are working at pace to reverse the continued decline in the number of social rent homes.

“The government has already given councils more flexibility to use Right to Buy receipts to deliver more social housing.

“This is on top of an additional £450m for councils to secure homes for families at risk of homelessness.

“We have made clear we will give councils and housing associations the stability they need and will set out further details at the next spending review.”

Scots warned not to buy XL bully dogs as ban announcement in Scotland edges closer | UK News

Scots are being warned not to buy XL bully dogs as a ban north of the border edges closer to being announced.

New regulations have come into force in England and Wales following a spate of attacks in which people have died or been injured by the breed.

It will be illegal to own this type of dog south of the border from 1 February without an exemption certificate.

At Holyrood on Tuesday, community safety minister Siobhian Brown told MSPs the government was “urgently reviewing” the policy following reports of widespread rehoming of the dogs from England to Scotland.

“It would be preferable not to acquire any such dog at the present time in Scotland,” she warned.

Ms Brown said officials are considering evidence on the situation, and she had met many different groups including the Scottish SPCA and the Dog’s Trust.

She said no breed had been banned for 30 years and it was important to listen to expert views.

Ms Brown said: “The unintended consequences of the UK government’s policy is that we’re now seeing an influx of XL bully dogs coming to Scotland.

“It is important to ensure Scotland does not become a safe haven or a dumping ground for the XL bully dogs from England and Wales.”

Sammy Wilkinson, 29, told Sky News how he had transported around 12 XL bully dogs from England to Scotland ahead of the ban coming into force.

He said “no dog is ever born bad” and believes a blanket ban is the wrong approach.

Pic: Sammy Wilkinson
Image:
Sammy Wilkinson has rehomed around 12 XL bully dogs in Scotland. Pic: Sammy Wilkinson

The Scottish SPCA agrees and believes both the UK and Scottish governments should instead target irresponsible ownership and low-welfare breeding practices.

The animal welfare charity told Sky News it had not seen an increase in the number of XL bully dogs being brought to its centres since the restrictions started.

Read more:
New rules come into force
How experts predict ban will change things

What are the rules in England and Wales?

XL bullies were added to the Dangerous Dogs Act on 31 October 2023, giving owners two months to prepare for the restrictions.

The dogs must be kept on a lead and muzzled when out in public.

Selling, breeding, abandoning or giving them away is also now illegal.

People have until 31 January to apply for an exemption certificate to keep their dog – and must have it neutered, microchipped and insured.

Owners in England and Wales who fail to obtain an exemption by then will have to euthanise their dog or face a possible criminal record and fine.

‘Place the blame on the breeder and owner, not the dog’

Responding to Ms Brown at Holyrood, Conservative MSP Jamie Greene stated: “The unintended consequences we’re seeing are not a result of UK legislation, but as a result of this Scottish government failing to take action.”

He highlighted a Facebook group with 20,000 members that has been discussing rehoming XL bullies in Scotland.

Mr Greene was dismissive of the government’s review, saying it had been going on for months.

He also referred to a report that an XL bully had been cruelly beaten to death after an unsuccessful attempt to sell it in Scotland.

He said: “I would not want to be the minister in charge of any policy who dithered and delayed a day longer than is necessary on this issue and another tragedy occurs.”

However, SNP backbencher Christine Grahame urged the government to take a different approach, saying the regulations are “hasty and simplistic”.

She suggested amending the Control of Dogs (Scotland) Act, explaining: “It places blame and responsibility where it lies – on the breeder and the owner, not the dog.”

Buy British push: Labelling for food imports not meeting UK welfare standards considered | Politics News

Imported foods may be labelled when they do not meet welfare standards, as the government considers measures to help shoppers “buy British”.

Environment Secretary Steve Barclay is set to announce plans to change labelling on goods to clarify if it is produced to the highest standards, as part of sweeping reform to support farmers.

Mr Barclay will also speak with major online retailers about ways of helping customers understand where their food comes from, including the option of a “buy British button” on supermarket websites.

He will say at the Oxford Farming Conference on Thursday: “British farmers take pride in producing food that meets, and often exceeds, our world-leading animal welfare and environmental standards.

“British consumers want to buy this top-quality food, but too often products produced to lower standards overseas aren’t clearly labelled to differentiate them.

“This is why I am proud to announce that we will consult on clearer food labelling so we can tackle the unfairness created by misleading labelling and protect farmers and consumers.”

Read more from Sky News:
Starmer to launch election campaign with vow to change the ‘character of politics’

Backlog of old asylum cases nearly cleared but new ones racking up

Fruit and veg in supermarkets

Mr Barclay is also set announce new support schemes for farmers, including paying them to maintain and upgrade footpaths, cycle paths and bridleways on their land as part of a push to get Britons outdoors.

They will also continue to receive support for items such as maps, way markers and fencing to mark out access, the government said.

Richard Benwell, CEO of Wildlife and Countryside Link, said: “Reforms to enable consumers to reward farmers who stick to high animal welfare standards make sense for everyone.

“With over 200 million farmed animals in the UK, this policy is a win for farmers and for the public.

“By labelling animal food products to present information about the welfare of the animals involved, consumers can reward high welfare farmers.

“After a two-year delay to the progression of these popular and cost-effective changes, we now need to see swift progress to allow consumer choice to drive widespread improvements in the welfare of farmed animals.”

Food giant Mars to buy Hotel Chocolat in £534m deal | Business News

Hotel Chocolat has agreed to a £534m takeover offer from Mars, the maker of goods from Snickers bars to Pedigree dog food.

The UK specialist chocolatier retailer said the cash offer represented a 170% premium to its London share price of 139p.

Shares soared by 164% at the market open in response.

Mars has proposed to pay 375p for each Hotel Chocolat share under the terms.

As an alternative, investors can elect to secure a share in the bid company for each Hotel Chocolat share they already own.

The board has recommended the deal.

The company, which has a 20-year history but just seven as a London-listed firm, said it would allow its brand to expand, particularly internationally.

Hotel Chocolat, so-named due to its hotel on a cacao estate in Saint Lucia, currently has 130 stores and a partnership in Japan but lacks the substantial funds needed to make a big push overseas.

Hotel Chocolat chief executive Angus Thirlwell
Image:
Hotel Chocolat chief executive Angus Thirlwell says the deal will allow for the company’s expansion ambitions to be realised.

Read more business news:
Royal Mail reports £319m half-year loss
Manchester United chief executive to ‘step down’

Chief executive and joint founder Angus Thirwell, who will stay with the business under the terms of the deal with Mars, said: “We know our brand resonates with consumers overseas, but operational supply chain challenges have held us back.

“By partnering with Mars, we can grow our international presence much more quickly.”

He and co-founder Peter Harris both own 27% of the equity, according to LSEG data.

Asda owners to buy EG Group’s UK and Ireland petrol stations for £2.27bn | Business News

Asda Group has said it will acquire petrol station operator EG Group’s UK and Ireland business, creating a company with combined revenues of nearly £30bn.

The news confirms a report by Sky News City editor Mark Kleinman last week, which said the “finishing touches” were being put on the deal.

Asda is the UK’s third-largest supermarket, and – like EG – is owned by brothers Zuber and Mohsin Issa and private equity group TDR Capital.

The £2.27bn deal will mean the acquisition of around 350 petrol stations and more than 1,000 food-to-go locations.

The resulting behemoth will have around 170,000 employees, nearly 600 supermarkets and 700 petrol forecourts.

Asda chairman Stuart Rose said: “Asda’s acquisition of EG UK and Ireland will create a consumer champion like the UK has never seen.

“Throughout my career in retail, one thing has always been true – that meeting the evolving needs of customers is the route to growth.

“This transaction is all about driving growth by bringing Asda’s heritage in value to even more communities and accelerating the growth of its convenience retail business.”

Asda co-owner Mohsin Issa said that the deal would be “positive news for motorists, as we will be able to bring Asda’s highly competitive fuel offer to even more customers”.

Read more:
7,000 Asda staff could face the sack unless they agree to a ‘shameful’ pay cut, union claims
Deliveroo hops to Asda expansion in grocery drive

Talks about a combination of Asda and EG UK have been under way for more than six months, and were initially reported by The Sunday Times in January.

The GMB union raised concerns in April and earlier this month that the tie-up could threaten food supplies, increase fuel prices and would only benefit the “super-wealthy elite”.

Nadine Houghton, GMB national officer, said: “The billionaire Issa Brothers and the elite multi-millionaire private equity fund managers at TDR capital want to use ASDA as a cash cow to pay off their debts.

“This merger is wrong on so many levels – it is wrong for consumers and will increase food prices, it is wrong for drivers with a chilling effect on fuel prices, it is wrong for ASDA’s workers and it is wrong for ASDA’s business.”

The Competition and Markets Authority said the ultimate owners of Asda are the same ultimate owners in the same proportion of ownership as EG Group and, therefore, the merger would not qualify for a CMA review.