Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom1xbet giriş1xbetdeneme bonusu veren sitelercasino sitelericasino sitelerideneme bonusudeneme bonusu veren siteler
Failures ‘across multiple agencies’ contributed to murder of Zara Aleena | UK News

Failures “across multiple agencies” contributed to the murder of Zara Aleena, an inquest has found.

The 35-year-old law graduate was killed as she walked home from a night out in east London.

Her killer Jordan McSweeney was freed from prison nine days before he attacked Ms Aleena as she walked home in Ilford on 26 June 2022.

Ms Aleena died in hospital from a blunt force head injury and neck compression, the jury said.

Undated handout file photo issued by the Metropolitan Police of sexual predator Jordan McSweeney, 29, who murdered Zara Aleena in Ilford, east London, in June 2022. McSweeney has won a Court of Appeal bid to reduce the minimum term of his life sentence. Issue date: Friday November 3, 2023.
Image:
Jordan McSweeney. Pic: PA

On Wednesday, it found “Zara’s death was contributed to by the failure of multiple state agencies to act in accordance to policies and procedures – to share intelligence, accurately assess risk of serious harm, [and] act and plan in response to the risk in a sufficient, timely and coordinated way”.

There were “significant failures to appropriately assess risk” by the prison and probation service, with McSweeney not being rated high risk.

It added there was “failure to define, understand and execute roles and responsibilities across multiple agencies to manage the offender effectively”.

“Attempts [by the Metropolitan Police] to arrest the offender post-recall were impeded by a number of factors, including inaccurate data on the recall and a lack of professional curiosity and follow-ups on Saturday 25 June,” the jury said.

McSweeney was handed a life sentence with a minimum term of 38 years at the Old Bailey in December 2022 after admitting Ms Aleena’s murder and sexual assault.

In November 2023, he won a Court of Appeal bid to reduce the minimum term of his life sentence to 33 years.

Area coroner Nadia Persaud had asked jurors to consider whether any failings by the prison and probation services or Metropolitan Police contributed to Ms Aleena’s death.

Read more from Sky News:
Families of girls killed in crash criticise decision not to charge driver
Emergency services hone in on area in search for missing teen
Phil Foden leaves England’s Euro 2024 camp temporarily

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Zara Aleena murder: What happened?

Delays in recall to prison

Police were unable to make contact with McSweeney after he was released on licence on 17 June 2022, but probation waited five days before initiating his recall to prison.

He missed his probation appointment on the day he was let out, with his mother telling staff he had passed out drunk at her house. Although it was rescheduled twice, McSweeney did not attend either appointment and his mother said she did not know where he was.

Despite the lack of contact, his recall was not initiated until 22 June and the recall report was signed on 24 June 2022.

Police were given powers to arrest McSweeney at 4.10pm the same day. In the early hours of 26 June McSweeney murdered Ms Aleena.

Probation officer: McSweeney should have been graded high risk

His recently qualified probation officer Austin Uwaifo said McSweeney should have been graded high risk and, if he had been, he would have pushed for him to have been recalled to prison earlier.

Mr Uwaifo said: “At the time, the thinking was that because he came out on the Friday, my thinking was to give him the opportunity to return – possibly he came out and decided to, for whatever reason, decided to go out and get drunk.”

Mr Uwaifo said the probation office was not staffed over the weekend but he would have requested a faster out-of-hours emergency recall if McSweeney had been graded high risk.

Initial inquiries closed prematurely

The police officer who actioned McSweeney’s recall said initial inquiries into his whereabouts were closed prematurely and more checks should have been carried out.

Metropolitan Police operations sergeant Ian Batten said he did not foresee McSweeney being a risk to the public after receiving a recall to prison notice for him on 24 June 2022.

Mr Batten also said he did not know initial inquiries into McSweeney’s whereabouts were closed before the end of his shift.

Chief probation officer Kim Thornden-Edwards said: “We have taken significant steps to address the failings previously identified since 2022, including mandatory training to improve risk assessments and implementing new processes to ensure the swift recall of offenders, and will look at any further action now required.”

Infected blood scandal ‘not an accident’, with ‘catalogue of failures’ and ‘downright deception’ by NHS and governments | UK News

The infected blood scandal was “not an accident” – and its failures lie with “successive governments, the NHS, and blood services”, a public inquiry has found.

From the 1970s, 30,000 people were “knowingly” infected with either HIV or Hepatitis C because “those in authority did not put patient safety first”, the inquiry’s report said. Around 3,000 people died.

Follow live:
‘Downright deception’ – latest on long-awaited report

The response of the government and NHS has “compounded” victims’ suffering, said inquiry chair Sir Brian Langstaff.

This included the “deliberate destruction of some documents” by Department of Health workers, in what Sir Brian described as a “pervasive cover-up” and “downright deception”.

“It could largely, though not entirely, have been avoided. And I report that it should have been,” he added.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

NHS ‘betrayed’ victims – inquiry chair

Among key findings are:

  • Patients were knowingly exposed to unacceptable risks of infection;
  • The risk of blood products causing severe infection were well known before most patients were treated – in the case of hepatitis since the end of the Second World War;
  • Transfusions were frequently given in situations where they were not clinically needed;
  • Pupils at Treloar’s school were regarded as “objects of research rather than children”;
  • Blood products imported to treat many people were unsafe and should not have been licensed for UK use;
  • There was no contact tracing carried out when Hepatitis C screenings were introduced;
  • There were repeated and ongoing failures by governments and the NHS to acknowledge people should not have been infected;
  • They repeatedly used inaccurate, misleading and defensive lines;
  • Infected people were “cruelly” told they received the best treatment available;
  • There was a refusal for decades to provide compensation;
  • Governments refused to set up a public inquiry until 2017

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Victims were ‘gas-lit for generations’

Sir Brian’s report makes 12 recommendations.

They include an immediate compensation scheme, memorials across the UK and at Treloar’s school, and that anyone who received a blood transfusion before 1996 be urgently tested for Hepatitis C.

New patients at any medical practice should also be asked if they had a transfusion before that time.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is expected to make an official apology on behalf of the government later today. The report stresses “it must be accompanied by action” for it to be meaningful.

Such action includes a “national recognition of this treatment disaster” and a change in culture across the NHS and civil service.

How the blood scandal happened

More than 30,000 people were infected with deadly viruses while they were receiving NHS care between the 1970s and 1990s.

The UK was not self-sufficient in blood donations in the early 1970s, so the government looked to the US for supplies to meet rising demand.

Batches of Factor VIII – an essential blood clotting protein which haemophiliacs do not produce naturally – started to be imported and used widely to treat the condition.

But much of it had been manufactured with blood collected from prisoners, drug addicts and other high-risk groups who were paid to give blood.

When the plasma was pooled together, it would take just one person carrying a virus to potentially infect an entire batch.

People were infected as donated blood was not tested for HIV until 1986 and hepatitis C until 1991.

The report mentions various politicians by name, including Ken Clarke, who was health secretary from 1988 to 1990.

It describes him as “unfairly dismissive” and “disparaging” towards victims, saying it would have “aggravated” their distress and upset.

Margaret Thatcher’s government claimed patients had “the best treatment available on the then-current medical advice” – but this was not true, the report says.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The victms of the scandal

‘I lost my twin, cousins and two friends’

After the 2,527-page document was published, victims spoke at a news conference in central London.

Clive Smith, of the Haemophilia Society, said the “cover-up” came as “no surprise” to him and others affected.

“We’ve known for decades. Now the country knows, the whole world knows,” he said. “This was systemic, by government, the civil service, and healthcare professionals.”

Mr Smith added: “There are doctors out there who should have been prosecuted for gross negligence manslaughter… those people should have been in the dock.”

Nigel Hamilton, from Haemophilia Northern Ireland, described the devastating personal impact of the scandal.

“I lost my twin on Christmas Day. I lost two cousins in the last two years. I have lost two friends in the last two months,” he said.

“The production of this report has been both healing and supportive. Compensation is not an answer to the problems we have. But it will help.

“Successive governments are culpable of abandonment and neglect.”

Select below to read more about some of the victims:

Read more:
The stories behind 100 victims
‘I gave my young son to his killers’
Analysis – Prosecutions must wait despite so many facing criticism

Jason Evans, from the Factor VIII campaign group, said: “Many of the politicians should hang their heads in shame… no single person has been responsible for this scandal.”

He added: “I would expect, over the coming days and weeks, for many more people to come forward and say sorry.”

And Andy Evans, representing the Tainted Blood campaigners, said victims had been “gaslit for generations”.

Challenging those in authority, he said: “We know that this should never have happened. What was your part in it?”

“Justice delayed really is – in this case – justice denied,” added Mr Evans.

Jackie Britton, from Bloodloss Families, said infected people were still struggling to get six-monthly scans and treatment.

“The government and the NHS should have a duty of care towards us,” she said.

“They have infected us, they have given us a death sentence.

‘Too little, too late’: Family reject ambulance service’s apology following review into failures and coverups | UK News

Ambulance bosses have apologised after staff were accused of covering up errors when patients died – but grieving families say this is “too little, too late”.

A review into allegations of failures at North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) found problems with how the trust responded to incidents, and highlighted “significant culture and behavioural issues”.

One of the cases highlighted concerned Quinn Evie Milburn-Beadle, a 17-year-old who was found hanging not far from her home in County Durham in 2018.

Quinn Evie Milburn-Beadle
Image:
Quinn Evie Milburn-Beadle

A NEAS paramedic declared her dead rather than trying to perform CPR. They have since been struck off, and the review found they had ignored national and local guidelines by not attempting advanced life support techniques.

“However small the probability of recovery was, [she] deserved that chance and so did her family,” the review led by retired hospital boss Dame Marianne Griffiths said.

It also noted that the trusts “coronial processes were not followed” as vital evidence for the coroner was withheld by NEAS.

Speaking to Sky News, Quinn’s parents David and Tracey Beadle described the report as a “whitewash” and “disappointing” – and called for a public inquiry.

Ms Beadle said: “It’s too little, too late. They’ve never apologised face to face to us, if they had held their hands up and admitted their failure and lying sooner then maybe I could accept the apology, but it’s gone too far for us now.

“We know there was a very very small chance that Quinn could have been saved that night, but to know not everything was done to help her, it keeps you awake at night.

“If that paramedic had kept her alive long enough to get her to hospital we could have all held her hand and said goodbye.

“I had to tell my son his little sister died on the phone, it was horrific. All of that could have been changed if he’d just done what he should have done.”

David and Tracey Beadle
Image:
David and Tracey Beadle

Another case involved the death of a 62-year-old man who urgently needed oxygen, with one crew hampered by a power cut that locked the gates at the ambulance station, and another unable initially to find his key safe to get into his home.

The chief executive of North East Ambulance Service, Helen Ray, told Sky News: “As a service, we let those families down at a point in time that they needed us and I’m deeply sorry for the distress that has caused them.

“An apology isn’t enough but this is an organisation that accepts that they’ve done something wrong, they’ve learned from it and they’re doing their very best to make sure that cannot reoccur.”

When asked about rebuilding trust with the people of the North East, Ms Ray said she’s confident the service is moving in the right direction.

“I understand the public will have concerns when they read this report, but we have learned from these situations from the four families and we have taken action. There may have been issues where people did not follow our systems and processes, when those are brought to our attention we act on those appropriately.”

Helen Ray
Image:
Helen Ray

The review, which was commissioned by then health secretary Sajid Javid in 2022, also looked into how the ambulance service dealt with whistleblowing following staff members raising concerns about practice within the trust.

Paul Calvert, one of the NEAS whistleblowers, says this report isn’t the full truth – and he alleges there are “dozens and dozens” more cases that are being covered up.

He told Sky News: “It doesn’t explain why information was held from the coroner in these four cases, because fundamentally it’s about dishonesty and the families deserve the truth. That’s what a proper judicial led public inquiry will give and deliver. This report delivers nothing but regurgitation of the facts that were already known.”

He added: “The trust has been a huge failure. It was obvious it was a failure when I joined in 2018. It’s a dysfunctional entity with extremely poor governance with a toxic bullying culture that fosters cover ups.”

Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK.

Household energy suppliers face £8m bill for ‘compensation failures’ | Business News

Three household gas and electricity firms have paid £8m for delays in producing final bills when customers switch suppliers.

Industry regulator Ofgem said more than 100,000 households were affected by failures at E.On Next, Good Energy and Octopus Energy.

It determined that the three firms either missed or delayed compensation payouts that were due when they did not provide a final bill within six weeks, as required when a customer switches to another provider.

Under rules brought in three years ago, customers are entitled to a £30 payment each if a final bill is not produced in six weeks, with a further £30 due if the compensation is not provided within another 10 working days.

Ofgem said the three firms either missed or delayed compensation payments worth £6.3m, with E.On Next accounting for the vast majority of that sum.

Some of the affected households had to wait over a year to receive redress, it found.

The watchdog said they had collectively paid an extra £1.7m to customers or the energy industry voluntary redress scheme (EIVRS), which supports vulnerable households.

The failures were highlighted at a time when families continue to grapple high gas and electricity bills – mostly a consequence of the surge in wholesale costs associated with the war in Ukraine.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Cost of living pain still to come

Government support for bills is due to end in June as seasonal demand falls, with the energy price cap also tipped to fall back from the following month though still remaining above an annual average of £2,000.

Switching suppliers, a move that was actively encouraged before the cost of living crisis emerged, has largely dried up now that the vast majority of households are off fixed-rate deals.

Competition for customers would be expected to pick up in the event of a stabilisation in the wholesale market.

Experts have suggested, however, a risk that pricing becomes frantic again Europe-wide in the run-up to next winter due to a continuing reliance on natural gas.

Read more from business:
Car-making giant wants renegotiation of Brexit deal
Almost 11m people struggling to keep up with their bills

Neil Kenward, director for strategy at Ofgem, said of its switching compensation regime: “Ofgem introduced these standards to make sure customers get the service they deserve when switching energy supplier.

“Our rules mean that where energy companies drag their heels, customers are automatically compensated.

“We won’t hesitate to hold energy companies to account, as we have done today.

“As the energy market starts to recover, we’ll likely see a return to more switching, and this action is a reminder to suppliers that they need to make switching as easy and convenient as possible for their customers, and where they cause undue delay, pay compensation swiftly.”

‘Thousands’ of corrupt officers may be in police after vetting failures, watchdog warns | UK News

Hundreds – if not thousands – of police officers who should have failed vetting checks may be serving in England and Wales, a watchdog has warned.

HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services looked at 11,277 police officers and staff across eight forces, examined 725 vetting files, considered 264 complaint and misconduct investigations, and interviewed 42 people.

They found cases where criminal behaviour was dismissed as a “one off”; applicants with links to “extensive criminality” in their families were hired as police officers; warnings a prospective officer could present a risk to the public were ignored; officers transferring between forces despite a history of complaints or allegations of misconduct; and basic blunders that led to the wrong vetting decisions.

The report found that some staff had criminal records, some were alleged to have committed serious crime, some had substantial undischarged debt, and some had relatives linked to organised crime.

Some 131 cases were identified where inspectors said vetting decisions were “questionable at best” – and in 68 of those, the inspectors disagreed with the decision to grant vetting clearance.

Matt Parr, Inspector of Constabulary, said: “It is too easy for the wrong people to both join and stay in the police.

“If the police are to rebuild public trust and protect their own female officers and staff, vetting must be much more rigorous and sexual misconduct taken more seriously.

“It seems reasonable for me to say that over the last three or four years, the number of people recruited over whom we would raise significant questions is certainly in the hundreds, if not low thousands… it’s not in the tens, it’s at least in the hundreds.”

Read more:
How Sarah Everard’s killer was caught
Metropolitan Police told to make ‘urgent improvements’ after watchdog raises ‘serious concerns’
Sir Mark Rowley replaces Dame Cressida Dick as new Met Police commissioner

Mr Parr said that the pressure to meet the government’s target to hire 20,000 new officers by March next year “cannot be allowed to act as an excuse” for poor vetting.

“The marked decline in public trust for policing is undoubtedly linked to the prevalence of some of these dreadful incidents we’ve seen in recent years, and you should have a higher standard of who gets in and who stays in if you’re going to look to reduce those kinds of incidents,” he added.

The report was commissioned by Priti Patel when she was home secretary, following the murder of Sarah Everard.

Ms Everard was killed by serving Met Police officer Wayne Couzens, who used his police warrant card under the guise of an arrest to kidnap her in March 2021.

33-year-old marketing executive Sarah Everard was murdered by former police officer Wayne Couzens
Image:
Sarah Everard

Female officers subject to ‘appalling behaviour by male colleagues’

The review did not look into the specifics of Couzens’ recruitment but its findings raise questions about whether improved security checks would have prevented him from getting a job with the Metropolitan Police.

The investigators also found an “alarming number” of female officers said they had been subject to “appalling behaviour by male colleagues”.

Among its 43 recommendations, HMICFRS said improvements were needed in the standards used for assessing and investigating misconduct allegations, as well as in the quality and consistency of vetting.

It also said that better guidance was needed on conduct in the workplace and definitions of misogynistic and predatory behaviour.

Home secretary ‘disappointed’

Home Secretary Suella Braverman said it was “disappointing that HMICFRS have found that, even in a small number of cases, forces are taking unnecessary risks with vetting”.

“I have been clear that culture and standards in the police need to change and the public’s trust in policing restored.

“Chief constables must learn these lessons and act on the findings of this report as a matter of urgency.”

National Police Chiefs’ Council chairman Martin Hewitt said: “Chief constables, supported by national bodies, will act on these recommendations and put the problems right because we cannot risk predatory or discriminatory individuals slipping through the net because of flawed processes and decision-making.

“The confidence of the public and our staff is dependent on us fixing these problems with urgency, fully and for the long term. Police chiefs are determined to do that.”