Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
Paedophiles using AI to ‘de-age’ celebrities and ‘nudify’ fully clothed children | Science & Tech News

Thousands of AI-generated images depicting child abuse have been shared on a dark web forum, new research has found.

About 3,000 AI images of child abuse were shared on the site in September, with 564 depicting the most serious kind of imagery including rape, sexual torture and bestiality.

Of the images, 1,372 depicted children aged between seven and 10 years old, according to research by the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF).

The charity said the most convincing images would even be difficult for trained analysts to distinguish from photographs and warned the text-to-image technology will only get better – making it harder for the police and other law enforcement to protect children.

Some images depict real children whose faces and bodies were used to train the AI models, which the charity has decided not to name.

In other cases, the models were used to “nudify” children based on fully clothed images of them uploaded online.

Criminals are also using the technology to create images of celebrities who have been “de-aged” to depict them as children in sexual abuse scenarios.

More on Artificial Intelligence

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Online victims write to tech bosses

‘This threat is here and now’

Ian Critchley, the National Police Chiefs’ Council lead for child protection in the UK, said the generation of such images online normalises child abuse in the real world.

“It is clear that this is no longer an emerging threat – it is here and now,” he said.

“We are seeing children groomed, we are seeing perpetrators make their own imagery to their own specifications, we are seeing the production of AI imagery for commercial gain – all of which normalises the rape and abuse of real children.”

The UK’s impending Online Safety Bill is designed to hold social media platforms more responsible for the content published on their platforms.

But it does not extend to the AI companies whose models are being altered and used to generate abusive imagery.

The UK government is hosting an AI safety summit next week that aims to address the risks associated with artificial intelligence and consider what action is needed.

Susie Hargreaves, chief executive of the IWF, said new EU laws on child sexual abuse should cover unknown imagery.

“We are seeing criminals deliberately training their AI on real victims’ images who have already suffered abuse,” she said.

“Children who have been raped in the past are now being incorporated into new scenarios because someone, somewhere, wants to see it.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘We don’t understand how AI works’

Politicians ‘caught asleep at the wheel’

Ellen Judson, head of the digital research hub at Demos, the think tank, said: “Once again, policymakers have been caught asleep at the wheel as generative AI continues to radically transform the nature of online harms.”

She called for the government to “get on the front foot” in their understanding and regulation of AI tools, specifically around how they are designed and developed.

“Waiting for the next crisis to occur before responding is simply not a sustainable approach,” she added.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “Online child sexual abuse is one of the key challenges of our age, and the rise in AI-generated child sexual abuse material is deeply concerning.

“We are working at pace with partners across the globe to tackle this issue, including the Internet Watch Foundation.

“Last month, the home secretary announced a joint commitment with the US government to work together to innovate and explore development of new solutions to fight the spread of this sickening imagery.”

Nicola Sturgeon will ‘fully cooperate’ with police after arrest of her husband | UK News

Nicola Sturgeon has said she will “fully cooperate” with police after the arrest this week of her husband Peter Murrell, the former chief executive of the Scottish National Party (SNP).

The former Scottish first minister broke her silence after Mr Murrell’s arrest on Wednesday as part of an investigation into the SNP’s finances.

She said recent days had been “obviously difficult” during a short statement outside the couple’s Glasgow home.

But she added she could not comment on the investigation into how around £600,000 which was earmarked for an independence campaign was spent, “as much as there are things I may want to say”.

“The last few days have been obviously difficult, quite dramatic at times, but I understand that is part of a process,” she told reporters.

Ms Sturgeon said she understands the “scrutiny that comes on me as a public figure”, adding: “But I’m also entitled to a little bit of privacy in my own home.”

Read more:
Peter Murrell arrested over SNP funding
SNP auditors resign as Murrell faces probe
Yousaf says governance of SNP ‘was not as it should be’

She also asked journalists to “respect” her neighbours’ privacy.

She said: “Over the years, as a result of living next door to me, they’ve been subjected to more than their fair share of disruption and inconvenience.

“And that has obviously been particularly the case over the last couple of days.”

“So that’s really all I needed to say just now, other than I intend to get on with life and my job as you would expect me to,” she added.

Police searched the former first minister’s home in Glasgow for more than a day during the week.

Asked if she had been questioned by police, Ms Sturgeon replied: “I haven’t, but I will fully cooperate with the police as and when they request that, if indeed they do.”

She wouldn’t say whether detectives have indicated that they wish to question her.

Mr Murrell was released on Wednesday evening without charge pending further investigation.

Ms Sturgeon said that her husband was home but was “not able to say anything” about his arrest.

“Again, that’s not necessarily a matter of choice. That’s just the nature of this,” Ms Sturgeon added.