Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
Budget’s lack of new defence spending dismays insiders and Tory MPs | UK News

The defence secretary has warned that the UK is in a “pre-war world”, friends and foes are ramping up defence spending, yet the Treasury had nothing new for Britain’s armed forces.

In fact, the level of funding set out in official tables in the spring budget on Wednesday appeared to track a decline of £2.5bn in defence spending in the financial year to March 2025 compared with the previous 12 months – although the Ministry of Defence said this was because the data did not include new money for the military that was pledged last autumn as well as assistance to Ukraine.

Grant Shapps said the overall defence budget was up £1.4bn to £55.6bn.

Still, the absence of any major announcement on defence spending – while not a surprise – was met by dismay among military insiders and even a number of Conservative MPs.

“The defence secretary recently warned that we are moving from a ‘post-war to a pre-war world’ – but nobody seems to have told HM Treasury,” said Mark Francois, a Conservative member of parliament’s defence select committee and former defence minister.

“Does Russia have to get to Warsaw before we start spending what we need on defence?”

Read more:
No pre-election fireworks in Hunt’s safety-first budget
Budget ‘absolutely not’ last throw of the dice before election, says Hunt
Fiscal headroom, inheritance tax thresholds – what key budget terms mean

Malcolm Chalmers, deputy director general of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) thinktank, said the lack of additional funding for the armed forces meant the UK appeared out of step with allies and would likely have to cut capabilities.

“One of the striking things in a comparative perspective is that the UK is just about the only major European country which is not increasing its defence budget in real terms, and one of the few European countries which is also not increasing its military assistance to Ukraine much in real terms,” he said in a statement.

Jeremy Hunt delivered his budget yesterday
Image:
Jeremy Hunt delivered the budget yesterday

This was, he said, in part because the UK had been first in Europe to provide military support to Ukraine and was already meeting a minimum NATO target of spending at least 2% of national income on defence – something that other allies are only starting to achieve.

“But the fact is that now, after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, many European countries are increasing their defence budgets rapidly, including Germany, the Scandinavian countries, the exposed eastern countries and quite a number of others as well,” Mr Chalmers said.

“And the UK government seems to have decided, given the wider fiscal squeeze and the priority being given to tax cuts, that there will be no more money for defence in this budget.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Tory MPs told Sky they ‘expected more’ from the budget

“Everything else which is not part of the nuclear budget is going to be under severe pressure. The government is going to have to make some unpleasant short-term decisions between different conventional equipment capabilities at a time when the Ukraine war is shining the spotlight on neglected capabilities in which our armed forces clearly need to invest more.”

In January, Mr Shapps used his first big speech as defence secretary to warn the UK was in a “pre-war world” where the foundations of global stability “are being shaken to their core”.

He described this as a “crossroads” where the UK and its allies needed to decide “whether to surrender to a sea of troubles, or do everything we can to deter the danger.”

Mr Shapps, during a recent visit to Catterick Garrison, in North Yorkshire, last month. Pic: PA
Image:
Mr Shapps, during a recent visit to Catterick Garrison, in North Yorkshire, last month. Pic: PA

Mr Shapps said: “I believe that, in reality, it’s no choice at all. To guarantee our freedoms, we must be prepared.”

Less than two months later, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt unveiled his Spring budget.

The only new defence-related pledge was for up to £26m to support a bid by the Office for Veterans’ Affairs to host the Invictus Games in Birmingham in 2027.

China ramping up defence spending

By contrast, China – which has also just fleshed out its spending priorities – is increasing its defence budget by more than 7% to more than £180bn.

The full UK budget statement did include a reminder of a commitment made last autumn to spend an extra £11bn over the next five years on defence.

But most of that money will be channelled into the UK’s nuclear deterrent, with only some going into a much-needed replenishment of ammunition stockpiles.

Daily defence costs down

Confusingly, a breakdown by department of government spending put the Ministry of Defence’s day-to-day running and other resource-related costs at £32.8bn in the year to March 2025, down from £35bn this financial year.

Capital expenditure was also forecast to slide to £18.9bn from £19.2bn over the same period.

The Ministry of Defence said these numbers excluded £2.5bn in new assistance to Ukraine as well as funding announced in the Autumn Statement and “accountancy adjustments”.

It was not immediately clear why this data from last year had not been reflected in the budget tables. It was also not clear why funding for Ukraine was being included as part of the UK defence budget.

Education secretary in four-letter rant over lack of thanks for doing a ‘f***ing good job’ on concrete crisis | Politics News

Education Secretary Gillian Keegan was caught on camera complaining about not being thanked for doing a “f***ing good job” over the unsafe concrete crisis.

After an interview with ITV News in Westminster, the cabinet minister criticised others for being “sat on their arses” and claimed the government had gone “over and above” in addressing concerns relating to reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC).

She said: “Does anyone ever say ‘You know you’ve done a f***ing good job because everyone else has sat on their arses and done nothing.

“No signs of that, no?”

Rayner gets new role in reshuffle – follow politics latest

Stephen Morgan MP, Labour’s shadow schools minister, said her comments were a “staggering admission that Rishi Sunak and the Conservatives have done nothing to address a problem that they have known about for years”.

“The education secretary has displayed staggering arrogance for saying she deserves a pat on the back for the chaos that is gripping our schools on their watch,” he said.

“Families, school leaders and school staff deserve an immediate apology for these appalling comments.”

Ms Keegan is due to be interviewed on the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge on Sky News tonight at 7:30pm.

A Number 10 source said her comments were “wrong” but the prime minister “has full confidence in his education secretary”.

Thousands of pupils face disruption at the start of term this week following a last-minute order to fully or partially close 104 schools because of concerns about RAAC.

Pupils face being taught in temporary classrooms, on different sites or even forced into pandemic-style remote lessons.

Mr Sunak has acknowledged hundreds more schools in England could be caught up in the crisis as he faced accusations he failed to fund a programme to replace ageing classrooms while chancellor.

The prime minister said that 95% of England’s schools were unaffected, leaving open the possibility that more than a thousand could still be impacted by concerns about RAAC.

Watch Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge from 7pm Monday to Thursday on Sky channel 501, Virgin channel 602, Freeview channel 233, on the Sky News website and app or on YouTube.

Mr Sunak said: “New information came to light relatively recently and it’s important that once it had, that the government acted on it as swiftly as possible.

“Of course I know the timing is frustrating, but I want to give people a sense of the scale of what we are grappling with here: there are around 22,000 schools in England and the important thing to know is that we expect that 95% of those schools won’t be impacted by this.”

But critics have accused the Tories of a “shambolic” handling of the situation, saying concerns about the material have been well known for years.

RAAC is essentially a lighter-weight form of concrete, used to build roofs, schools, colleges and other buildings from the 1950s until the mid-1990s.

Experts have long-warned the material has now reached the end of its shelf life and is liable to collapse.

Earlier Jonathan Slater, who was secretary at the Department for Education (DfE) from May 2016 to August 2020, claimed the Treasury had failed to fully fund school rebuilding schemes – including during Mr Sunak’s time at the helm.

He said up to 400 schools a year need to be replaced, but the DfE only got funding for 100, despite the government knowing there was a “critical risk to life”.

Mr Sunak dismissed that criticism as “completely and utterly wrong”.

But Labour insisted he “bears huge culpability for his role in this debacle” – saying funding for rebuilding schools has been slashed over the years.

Analysis published by the party found that spending on school rebuilding between 2019 and 2020 was at £765m, but this fell to £560m the following year.

Spending dropped again to £416m in 2021 to 2022, the party said.

Read more:
RAAC crisis: Obese patients can’t be moved from ground floor at hospital
RAAC: The once wonder material causing a chaotic start to the academic year

Bridget Phillipson, the shadow education secretary, said: “The defining image of 13 years of the Conservative-run education system will be children sat under steel girders to stop the roof falling in.

“Rishi Sunak bears huge culpability for his role in this debacle: he doubled down on Michael Gove’s decision to axe Labour’s schools rebuilding programme and now the chickens have come home to roost – with yet more disruption to children’s education.”

Dame Priti Patel takes aim at government’s ‘alarming and staggering lack of clarity’ over plans to house asylum seekers at Essex RAF base | Politics News

Former home secretary Dame Priti Patel has accused her former department of being “evasive” and “secretive” over how long it plans to use a former RAF base to house asylum seekers.

In a letter to her successor Suella Braverman and the immigration minister, Robert Jenrick, earlier on Monday, Dame Priti wrote that the “lack of clarity” over how long the government plans to house asylum seekers at the former base in Wethersfield, Essex, “has been alarming and staggering”.

The site near Dame Priti’s Witham constituency has been earmarked to house 1,700 asylum seekers by the autumn as part of plans to reduce spending on hotels, with the first residents having arrived in July.

RAF Wethersfield is one of a number of former military sites earmarked for housing asylum seekers, alongside the Bibby Stockholm barge which was evacuated on Friday after legionella bacteria was found in the water supply.

(Left-right) Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak, Carrie Johnson and Home Secretary Priti Patel watch as Prime Minister Boris Johnson delivers his keynote speech at the Conservative Party Conference in Manchester. Picture date: Wednesday October 6, 2021.
Image:
Dame Priti suggested Mr Sunak’s government was being ‘secretive about its intentions’

In the letter posted to X, formerly Twitter, the former home secretary said that when it was announced on 29 March that the site would be used for asylum seekers, the length of time it would be used was not stated.

She said reports the site would need to be used for five years to achieve value for money for the taxpayer was “concerning”, and said “no clarity has been provided” in subsequent discussions between Home Office officials and local partners.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky News goes inside asylum camps

Citing three written parliamentary questions on the topic submitted back in June, she said the failure to provide direct answers “gives the impressions the Home Office is being evasive” and “suggests that the government is being secretive about its intentions”.

She added: “Clear answers now need to be provided by the Home Office and the government must be transparent rather than evasive. The lack of clarity has been alarming and staggering.”

Read more:
Asylum seeker removed from Bibby Stockholm

Sunak still has ‘confidence’ in home secretary
Asylum seekers ‘should be moved back on the barge’

A Home Office spokesman said: “Delivering accommodation on surplus military sites will provide cheaper and more orderly, suitable accommodation for those arriving in small boats whilst helping to reduce the use of hotels.

“These accommodation sites will house asylum seekers in basic, safe and secure accommodation as they await a decision on their claim.

“In the case of Wethersfield, the Home Office has obtained planning permission to use the site for 12 months.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

“We understand the concerns of local communities and will work closely with councils and key partners to manage the impact of using these sites, including liaising with local police to make sure appropriate arrangements are in place.”

The department said it intended to reply to Dame Priti’s letter to the home secretary “in due course”.

Tories accused of ‘unforgivable lack of urgency’ to improve support for rape survivors | Politics News

Labour has accused the government of displaying an “unforgivable lack of urgency” in tackling the needs of rape victims and implementing crucial recommendations made by two scathing reports.

Analysis by the party shows that several “immediate” recommendations from the Criminal Justice Joint Inspectorates (CJJI) have been left unfulfilled.

The CJJI conducted two comprehensive reports, one in July 2021 and the other in February 2022, focusing on the treatment of rape victims by the police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

Politics latest: Sadiq Khan says 14 times he’s ‘listening’ on ULEZ

The reports found that the criminal justice system was failing victims of rape and widespread reform is needed to build trust and secure justice.

Labour said that 18 months on from delivery of those reports, “ministers have yet to lift a finger on most of their recommendations”.

They pointed to six recommendations where the CJJI called for “immediate action” to be taken.

These include establishing specialist rape offence courts to help with the backlog of cases, and a consultation on creating a commissioner for rape and sexual offences.

Labour said the Conservative government had also failed to publish sufficient data on the use of special measures in rape cases, including the use of pre-recorded video evidence for victims.

The government has championed this as a tool for improving the experience of rape survivors when they are cross-examined, but Labour claims it is being “drastically under-used”.

As well as this, the collaborative use of bad character applications in rape cases, often crucial in securing a conviction, and providing victims with the opportunity to make a personal statement had not been acted on.

Shadow attorney general Emily Thornberry said: “At a time when we have a record backlog for rape cases going through our court system, ministers should be doing everything possible to support the victims of those attacks, and help them with the trauma they are facing.

Labour's Emily Thornberry
Image:
Labour’s Emily Thornberry

“Instead, their response to the recommendations from the Joint Inspectorate shows an inexplicable lack of focus and an unforgivable lack of urgency.

“The fact is that only a change of government will deliver the action we need.”

A report this year found victims of rape and sexual assault are waiting more than two years for their cases to be heard.

Barristers have previously told Sky News that the criminal justice system is “about to crack”, with a shortage of barristers, judges and court room hindering efforts to clear the crown courts backlog.

Read More:
Explicit victim-blaming’ by police officers investigating rape cases uncovered as govt insists progress is made

The state of the justice system is expected to be a dominant issue at the next general election, with both major parties seeking to sell themselves as the party of law and order.

Ms Thornberry pointed to a Labour pledge to put specialist rape courtrooms in every Crown Court in England and Wales, and to halve violence against women and girls within 10 years of taking office.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Justice Sec: Those who are convicted of rape are getting sentenced to on average 30% longer in prison than in 2010

But Home Office minister Sarah Dines hit back saying that Labour “have voted against every tougher sentence we have brought in”.

She claimed that when he was head of the CPS Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer “oversaw a huge drop in the number of sexual offences which were prosecuted and Thornberry criticised his ‘backsliding'”.

Ms Dines was referencing a critical letter the Labour MP sent in 2012 to then director of public prosecutions Sir Keir and then-attorney general Dominic Grieve amid changes to guidance on specialist barristers and rape prosecutions.

In that letter, she condemned the government’s decision to “slash the Crown Prosecution Service’s budget by 25% over the course of the parliament”, which she said had resulted in victims not getting the necessary legal support.

Ms Dines added: “Conservative governments have increased convictions, increased sentences, reformed our justice system and quadrupled funding to better support victims – making sure that the full force of the law is brought to bear to protect women and girls.”

Government left 1.7 million people waiting for energy support due to a ‘lack of bandwidth’ | Business News

Millions of people were left waiting too long for energy support due to a lack of government “bandwidth”, according to a report from the cross-party Public Accounts Committee.

More than a million households became eligible for support too late, while a further two million homes using prepayment meters have yet to redeem their £400 voucher, according to the committee report on the energy bills support scheme.

As many as 900,000 households only became eligible for the £400-off energy bills support scheme in late February, nearly five months after consumers began receiving discounts on the main scheme, the report says. Those were houses without a direct relationship with an electricity supplier, including those living in park homes or on boats.

A further 836,000 residences in Northern Ireland only began receiving their £400 off energy bills in January 2023, three months later than in the rest of the UK.

Read more:
Can National Grid really provide emergency energy when demand is high?
National Grid to keep blackout prevention scheme for coming winter

There were a remaining two million households in Great Britain on prepayment meters in February yet to redeem vouchers for their £400 payment, the report added.

The department tasked with administering the payments – the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) – told the committee it did not have the bandwidth to make sure support reached all groups in a timely way.

It acknowledged it is also the duty of electricity suppliers to ensure vouchers are redeemed.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What is the energy price cap and how does it affect you?

While the department has since been split up, the committee said it should analyse which groups of households have not redeemed their vouchers and outline further action to increase retrieval rates.

“Serious concerns” were raised over the government’s “lack of urgency” in addressing the energy market failures that are leading to high energy bills for consumers, the report says.

“The Treasury and [the new Department for Energy Security and Net Zero] have also not fully grasped the pressures the non-domestic sector will face after the energy bill relief scheme ended in March 2023, or the potential risk of insolvencies,” it says.

The universal nature of the energy support was criticised in the report as homes and businesses that did not need support received it anyway.

Despite the plans in operation last winter, the government is not prepared for the coming winter, according to the committee.

“Almost halfway through the year we have not yet seen plans to ensure energy affordability for the coming winter,” committee chair Dame Meg Hillier said.

“As a matter of urgency, the government must show it’s clear not just on how households and businesses will be protected in any future price rises, but how to ensure resilience in the sector as a whole.”

The government has also been urged to invest any unspent resources on helping low-income and vulnerable homes by the chief executive of National Energy Action.

“That should support more than 2.5 million low-income and vulnerable households who are no longer receiving any government support,” Adam Scorer said.

“Without more targeted support this autumn and winter these households will be exposed to the worst of this ongoing crisis with all the dreadful consequences for health and wellbeing that we have seen day in and day out in recent times.”

Caroline Flack: Met Police apologises to family of former Love Island presenter over lack of records on charging decision | Ents & Arts News

Caroline Flack’s family members have received an apology from the Met Police over the force’s failure to keep a record about a decision to charge her with assault rather than giving her a caution.

The former Love Island presenter was facing prosecution for allegedly assaulting her boyfriend when she took her own life in February 2020.

Her mother, Christine Flack, has said she believes her daughter was treated differently by the police because she was famous.

Following the incident involving Flack and her boyfriend Lewis Burton in December 2019, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) recommended that the star should receive a caution. However, the Met Police appealed this, and she was instead charged with assault by beating.

At the inquest into her death, a coroner ruled that the 40-year-old star took her own life after learning prosecutors were pressing ahead with the charge.

A spokesperson for the Met Police said the force was ordered to apologise to Flack’s family following a review by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which found there was not a “record of rationale” to appeal against the CPS decision.

“We have done so and acknowledged the impact that this has had on them,” the Met spokesperson said. “Our thoughts and sympathies remain with Ms Flack’s family for their loss.”

After an initial investigation by the force’s Directorate of Professional Standards (DPS) found there was no misconduct, Flack’s family escalated their concerns to the IOPC – and the Met was ordered to reinvestigate complaints relating to the process involved in appealing against the CPS decision.

This investigation concluded in May 2022, with the DPS finding again that the service provided was acceptable – although the force did identify “some learning around using IT systems to record appeal decisions and the use of decision models for cautions, which are being implemented”.

In June 2022, the IOPC received another application to review the force’s reinvestigation.

Caroline Flack
Image:
Flack presented Love Island but stood down from the role after being charged

An IOPC spokesperson said that following “a thorough assessment of this case” the review had been partially upheld. While it did not identify any misconduct, it concluded that one officer should receive “reflective practice”.

“We determined there were individual and organisational failings by the MPS (Metropolitan Police Service), therefore the service provided did not reach the standard a reasonable person could expect in relation to some aspects of the reinvestigation,” the spokesperson said.

“This is because the officer involved did not record their rationale for appealing the original CPS decision to take no further action and the force, at that time, had no system in place to record rationales in these circumstances.

“We have concluded the officer involved should be subject to the reflective practice review process. We have also asked the MPS to apologise to the complainant in relation to the rationale recording, and the absence of a system to record such rationales.”

Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK

Lack of cover for category two ambulance calls in some areas put public safety at risk, Steve Barclay says | Politics News

The health secretary claims the disparate level of emergency cover during recent ambulance strikes could not be “relied upon to ensure patient and public safety”.

In a letter to the GMB union sent ahead of further strikes this month, and seen by Sky News, Steve Barclay accepted all areas that staged walkouts ensured the most serious 999 calls were still answered.

But he said the lack of cover for category two calls – which includes strokes and chest pain – in some areas were “material to the risk to life of the strike action”.

Mr Barclay said the government “greatly values the vital work ambulance workers do”, but he criticised the “volatile” assurances given to him about cover by trade unions during December’s industrial action, claiming the “scope and extent of arrangements [was] being disputed right up to wire”.

While he believed in the right to strike and that “a certain amount of disruption is inherent” during walkouts, he said that “during recent action I have not been reassured that the current system of voluntary arrangements can be relied upon to ensure patient and public safety”.

His letter comes in response to an open letter from the GMB to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Saturday, where the union claimed ambulance staff felt “demonised” and appealed to the government to “stop attacking us”.

It also comes ahead of the government’s anti-strike legislation returning to the Commons on Monday, which will set minimum service levels for fire, ambulance and rail services for when the sectors decide to take action – and leave unions at risk of being sued if they fail to comply.

Read more:
Strikes this month – who is taking action and when

NHS waiting lists are a ‘national scandal’
Nursing union threatens biggest walkout to date

Mr Barclay strongly defended the new law in the letter, saying it would “introduce greater clarity and certainty around which services must continue and to what extent, to give the public much needed assurance that a certain level of urgent and time critical care will always continue throughout strike action”

The health secretary said the particular services that would be impacted by the legislation where chosen “chiefly because we recognise disruption to blue light services puts lives at immediate risk”, but he insisted it was “not ending anyone’s right to strike”.

Click to subscribe to the Sophy Ridge on Sunday podcast

But Labour has vowed to vote against the bill, with party leader Sir Keir Starmer urging the government to “do the grown-up thing, get in the room and negotiate” with the unions.

A spokesperson for the GMB said the union’s ambulance committee would discuss the letter from Mr Barclay at a meeting on Monday and consider their response.

If you are an NHS worker and would like to share your experiences with us anonymously, please email NHSstories@sky.uk

Jeremy Vine ‘disgusted’ with ‘lack of values’ of social media companies over stalker videos | UK News

TV and radio host Jeremy Vine has said he is “amazed at how hard it is” to get social media companies to act in response to his jailed stalker’s videos.

Former BBC local radio presenter Alex Belfield, 42, was sentenced to five years and 26 weeks last Friday after being found guilty of waging a campaign against a number of figures from the broadcasting world.

Jurors accepted he caused serious alarm or distress to two victims and found him guilty of “simple” stalking in relation to Channel 5 and BBC Radio 2 presenter Mr Vine and theatre blogger Philip Dehany.

Ex-BBC presenter Alex Belfield arrives at Nottingham Crown Court
Image:
Alex Belfield

Asked about the response of the social media companies, Mr Vine told BBC Two’s Newsnight: “I am amazed at how hard it is to get them to realise.

“So we went to YouTube and said: ‘Come on, what is going on with this guy? You can’t allow him to just defame’.

“And then we said: ‘OK, there is a libel action now based on that video, that video, that video’ – they still won’t take them down.

“Eventually I have to go through a lawyer, they take down individual videos, and then when he is convicted they demonetise him. But half the videos about me are still up there.

“His technique was to say ‘copy and share’ so you will have someone who takes his video in Moscow and hosts it. It will always be out there, I have got to live with that.

“But the fact that YouTube hosts this stuff, they have no responsibility. They don’t care. They don’t give a toss. Sorry for my language but I am disgusted by their lack of values.

“And Twitter as well. He is in prison and he has still got a Twitter account. What the hell is that about? I don’t understand it.”

Mr Vine said that Belfield had put out a video “saying he is going to be right back up and running”.

Mr Vine also said both the victims and their friends had flagged Belfield’s content in a way that was both “continuous” and “constant” and one person even went to YouTube’s headquarters to ask its reception if anything could be done.

“It’s not a mystery to them which are the problem accounts and they just need to take them down,” he said.

Twitter declined to comment, and YouTube has also been contacted for comment.