Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
Great Ormond Street Hospital: Children left in pain by surgeon’s botched leg operations, reviews find | UK News

Young patients of a surgeon have been left in ongoing pain with nerve damage after botched and unnecessary operations on their limbs, expert reviews have found.

It has emerged at least one child had to have a leg amputated following procedures carried out by Yaser Jabbar at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), while others suffered leg length discrepancies needing further and prolonged care.

Reviews of medical records carried out by the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) found the 43-year-old had caused “serious harm” though “unacceptable” treatment, according to a lawyer acting for the families of a number of children, some as young as just four-months-old when seen by Mr Jabbar.

GOSH has apologised to the patients “who received poor care” and has launched its own investigation into the cases of 721 children treated by the accused surgeon in its orthopaedic department.

It is the latest in a series of scandals to rock the NHS and will again raise questions over the role of senior hospital managers.

Mr Jabbar, who qualified from St George’s Hospital Medical School in London, was registered with a licence to practise until January of this year, according to the General Medical Council website.

GOSH said he had not worked there since 2022. The Sunday Times reported he only stepped down from his role last September after an 11-month sabbatical on full pay.

He is now listed as working in Dubai.

Caroline Murgatroyd, from Hudgell Solicitors, who is representing affected families, said the RCS review findings “paint a very worrying picture”.

She said: “They outline unacceptable assessments, examinations, clinical decision-making, and treatments of patients, poor communication with families with regards to seeking their consent for treatments and procedures, as well as failures to make it clear what kind of complications children could face after undergoing surgery.

“There are also references to children being subjected to surgeries which the RCS review panel could see no justification for, with children undergoing procedures which brought them no clear benefit.

“The findings so far have been shocking to read and have been very upsetting for our clients.”

Ms Murgatroyd added: “In one particular case a child underwent an amputation after having been put through a series of procedures. In this case the review panel found the amputation could possibly have been avoided with a different route of treatment.

“Children have suffered leg length discrepancies following inappropriate and unnecessary surgeries which will require further and prolonged treatment, and nerve injuries causing ongoing pain.

“There is also a lack of documentation over the decision-making process, or about discussing cases with consultant colleagues or the families of children themselves.”

The findings indicated there had been “serious failures in care to many patients, over a number of years”, she said.

‘Brushed under the carpet’

One of her clients – the father of a child, who was six-years-old when they underwent a procedure by Mr Jabbar in July 2021 – said they had repeatedly raised concerns with the hospital “but heard nothing back”.

He added: “When they did an initial investigation it just seemed that everything was being brushed under the carpet and that was very upsetting.

“It was only at a later stage, when our child was in terrible pain, that we saw another doctor and the hospital admitted that the wrong frame had been used.

“Revision surgery was then needed and our child is still undergoing treatment now, but thankfully we now have a new surgeon, at the same hospital, who has been amazing.”

Apology

GOSH said in a statement: “We are deeply sorry to all patients who received poor care and understand that this may have had a significant impact on their health and wellbeing.

“In 2022 we asked the Royal College of Surgeons to review our paediatric orthopaedic service, after concerns were raised by a number of our patient families and staff.

“As part of this, we are carrying out a review into the care of some of our patients.

“We have written directly to all patients and their families whose care is being reviewed so please be assured you would have been contacted if we are looking at your care.”

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Read more on Sky News:
Private sector to be used to tackle NHS waiting list
Deaths of 2,000 mental health patients investigated

GOSH added: “The surgeon who is the main focus in the media coverage has not worked at GOSH since 2022.

“Our priority is ensuring that all patients have their care reviewed thoroughly and we are working through the group of patients to understand any issues with their care.

“This is a complex task and is taking some time. If when reviewing a patient’s care we find instances of harm we will contact patients and families again to determine the next steps for them.

“We are committed to learning from every single patient that we treat and to being open and transparent with our families when care falls below the high standards we strive for. Inviting external reviews into our services helps us to identify any changes that need to be made to ensure we are delivering the very best care for our patients.”

Hidden fees and fake reviews for online shoppers to be banned | Business News

Unavoidable hidden charges for online consumers, a practice known as drip pricing, is to be banned under a wider transparency drive.

The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) said additional fees, which are only revealed late in the checkout process and cost customers £2.2bn a year, must be included in the headline price under the planned Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill.

The measure will affect things like tickets for trains and the cinema but not optional fees, such as airline seat and luggage upgrades.

The crackdown will also see fake reviews added to a list of banned business practices, with website hosts to be accountable for information on their pages.

New rules on grocery pricing also aim to make costs clearer for shoppers.

Money latest: Millions will get more take-home pay this month – here’s why experts say you shouldn’t spend it

The proposals cover so-called unit pricing, the cost per kilo for example, which would have to be consistently displayed across ranges including discounted items to give shoppers an informed choice on whether they are getting the best deal.

They build on the work of consumer groups and, latterly, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

November 2023: CMA targets supermarket loyalty schemes and supplier prices

Kevin Hollinrake, the minister for enterprise, markets and small business, said: “From supermarket shelves to digital baskets, modern day shopping provides customers with more choice than ever before. But with that comes the increased risk of confusion, scams and traps that can easily cost the public more than they had planned.

“Today’s announcement demonstrates the clear steps we’re taking as a government to ensure customers can compare purchases with ease, aren’t duped by fake reviews, and have the sting of hidden fees taken away.”

Read more:
Drip pricing: Three psychological reasons we fall for the technique
Amazon and Google investigated over efforts to tackle fake reviews

A spokesperson for the CMA, which would be responsible for policing the changes, said: “It’s positive to see the government pushing ahead with changes to tackle behaviour that misleads shoppers or leaves them out of pocket – which includes accepting the CMA’s recommendations for clearer groceries pricing.

“Stronger laws and tools, including giving the CMA the power to fine companies for breaching consumer law under the DMCC Bill, will bolster the work we are already doing to protect consumers.”

Royal Ascot reviews security plans after series of activist protests | UK News

Security plans for Royal Ascot will be reassessed after the Epsom Derby was disrupted by more activists targeting a sporting event.

Sky News understands Ascot chiefs will be “observing and learning” from the track invasion on Saturday at Epsom by animal rights campaigners ahead of their five-day horse racing festival from 20 June.

The meeting starts with the spectacle of the Royal Procession in horse-drawn landaus so it could attract the King and Queen. It was a favourite event attended annually by the late Queen Elizabeth II.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Man rugby tackled after invading race

Activists have shown they are undeterred by court injunctions when attempting to sabotage the Derby.

And it’s not just animal welfare groups disrupting sport to ensure their causes and demands are heard.

Just Stop Oil has vowed to continue waging direct action at sporting events in a summer that also sees an Ashes cricket series across England, the Wimbledon tennis championships and Formula One British Grand Prix.

Image:
Protesters being arrested at the Grand National in April

Spokesperson Chloe Naldrett told Sky News: “Under any normal circumstances, this kind of disruption wouldn’t be acceptable. But we’re not in normal circumstances.

“We’ve really got to decide how much worse we’re going to let this [environmental] problem get before we start taking the right action.”

They are demanding the government blocks new oil and gas developments as Labour has reportedly pledged to do if elected to power.

Read more:
One charged and 30 released on bail after protesters disrupt Epsom Derby
118 arrested over protests around Grand National
Just Stop Oil protesters arrested after halting play at World Snooker Championship

“We are looking at everything non-violently reasonable – and looking at all kinds of civil resistance – in order to achieve that aim, which is absolutely fundamental to our survival,” Ms Naldrett said.

“We know that these actions are controversial, and that not everybody will agree with us. But we’re not trying to get elected.”

But an events logistics expert with four decades’ experience in the industry warned of a potential backlash by the public.

Stadium Group owner David McAtamney told Sky News: “My concern is the protection of the people that are protesting. If they are very close to large numbers of people who become very angry at their actions then of course we have to protect them as well.”

A Just Stop Oil protestor jumps on the table at the World Snooker Championships
Image:
A Just Stop Oil protestor jumps on the table at the World Snooker Championships

Just Stop Oil demonstrators caused a stoppage at the World Snooker Championships in April by throwing orange powder on the green baize tables.

Mr McAtamney said: “Search lanes have to be more vigilant, to make sure that powder and paint and whatever may be is not coming into these events. So that’s the first point of contact and then hopefully we can stop some of this going on.”

Dangerous plug-in heaters promoted in fake reviews and dodgy ads fail fire safety tests | UK News

Dangerous plug-in heaters are being sold online – taking advantage of those trying to stay warm despite surging energy bills, Which? says.

Some of the products were featured in fake reviews and dodgy ads, leaving people at risk of fires or electric shocks.

Ten mini plug-in heaters – some as cheap as £12 – were tested by Which? and all of them failed safety tests. Four of them – three on eBay and one on Amazon – were a fire risk.

All of the models tested did not meet the Electrical Equipment Safety Regulations.

Rocio Concha, Which? director of policy and advocacy, said the products were illegal, could cause serious harm, and show that online platforms must do more to protect consumers.

She added: “The government must urgently legislate to strengthen product safety, including giving online marketplaces greater legal responsibility for unsafe products sold on their sites so that consumers are far better protected.

“Self-regulation of online platforms is simply not working. These platforms have put in place inadequate measures which leave consumers at risk. The government must give these platforms greater responsibility to protect people online.”

Among the problematic heaters was the Plug-In Wall Heater 500W sold by a third-party seller on eBay.

Which? said the plastic surround holding the heating element in place melted and the heating element slipped down to create another melted area, which was against the outer grill, meaning that touching it could result in shock or burns.

Several versions of this heater sold on Amazon, eBay and Wish all failed, and Trading Standards also issued a recall notice for another model sold on eBay that appeared to be identical.

An electric portable plug-in heater, sold on Amazon, had counterfeit fuses that had been used in the plug for the heater. They posed a risk of electric shock, fire or even an explosion, Which? said.

Another plug-in wall heater, sold on eBay, posed a risk of fire or electric shock, with internal wires soldered directly onto a circuit board, while another circuit board was just loose within the product.

An Amazon spokesperson said: “Safety is a top priority at Amazon and we require all products offered in our store to comply with applicable laws and regulations.

“Two products were removed in December, including one in relation to safety concerns, and we have proactively removed similar items and introduced measures to prevent new products going on sale.

“We have removed the remaining two products while we investigate. If customers have concerns about an item they’ve purchased, we encourage them to contact us directly so we can investigate and take appropriate action.”

An eBay spokesperson said: “We take the safety of our users very seriously. We had already removed three of the five listings that Which? flagged to us. One of the two remaining listings is selling a different product and the other one has already ended.

“We use block filter algorithms aimed at preventing unsafe products from being listed. These filters blocked 4.8 million listings in 2022 and are updated on a regular basis.

“On the rare occasion that an unsafe product does make it on to site, we swiftly remove it and provide product safety education to the sellers to prevent relisting.”

Wish said: “Product safety is a top priority for Wish. The listing highlighted by Which? has been removed from our European platform, and we are monitoring for any identical or similar listings. We will take further action as appropriate.”

Google was asked for comment but had not provided one.