Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
Labour to oppose removing lifetime pensions allowance, calling it a ‘tax cut for the rich’ | Politics News

Labour has said it will oppose plans to abolish the lifetime pensions allowance, calling it a “tax cut for the rich”.

Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said the party will force a vote on the policy next week, predicting it could “unravel as quickly as it began”.

Ms Reeves compared it to Liz Truss’s doomed attempt to cut the 45p tax rate for the wealthiest 1% last year, which was scrapped following a widespread backlash.

She told ITV’s Robert Peston: “Labour will force a vote on this next week.

“I will say to Conservative MPs… whose side are you on? Are you on the side of ordinary working people in your constituencies who are seeing their taxes go up, or are you going to vote with Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt for a tax cut for the wealthiest in society?

“That’s the wrong priority and I would urge Conservative MPs to do the right thing and vote with Labour next week.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Jeremy Hunt says the pensions lifetime allowance will be abolished

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt used his budget on Wednesday to announce the abolition of the lifetime pensions allowance.

It means people will be allowed to put aside as much as they can in their private scheme without being taxed – removing the £1.07m limit.

Mr Hunt will also increase the pensions annual tax-free allowance, from £40,000 to £60,000, under measures designed to increase the workforce by removing disincentives to being employed for longer.

The policies will cost the Treasury more than £1.1bn a year by 2027-28, with the aim of stopping an estimated 15,000 high earners – including senior NHS doctors – leaving the workforce.

But experts said that millions of savers will feel no impact from the changes, with Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) Director Paul Johnson saying they would “encourage a relatively small number of better-off workers to stay in the workforce a bit longer”.

Meanwhile, the Resolution Foundation warned the policies may actually cause some workers to retire early or use “their now uncapped pensions saving to avoid inheritance tax”.

Chief executive Torsten Bell said the measures are “hugely regressive and wasteful”, adding: “It’s a big victory for NHS consultants but poor value for money for Britain.”

Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, also hit out at the plan, saying: “The only permanent tax cut in the budget is for the richest 1%. How can that happen?”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Mhari Aurora explains all you need to know about the budget

Budget at a glance

The pensions tax break was one of the headline announcements from Mr Hunt’s budget, alongside a pledge to introduce free childcare for children under three.

Some key policies were revealed ahead of the chancellor’s speech, including keeping the cap on energy prices at £2,500 for a further three months, despite a planned rise to £3,000 in April, and 12 new investment zones.

A number of other plans were unveiled by Mr Hunt, including:

• Bringing charges for prepayment meters in line with direct debit charges, impacting over four million households and saving them an average of £45 per year

• Making duty on draught products in pubs up to 11p lower than supermarkets

• Maintaining the freeze in fuel duty

Read more on the budget:
Tax calculator – see if you’re better off
Ed Conway: There’s a feel-bad factor coming, and this budget won’t help

Unions reacted angrily to a lack of measures on public sector pay, saying Mr Hunt “stuck up two fingers to workers’ with the budget”.

The announcement took place against the backdrop of an estimated half a million workers, including junior doctors, teachers and civil servants, walking out in disputes over pay, jobs and conditions.

Despite the promises of help with the cost of living, families still face a painful financial squeeze.

Living standards, based on real household disposable income per person, is expected to fall by a cumulative 5.7% over the two financial years 2022-23 and 2023-24 – less than forecast in November but still the largest since records began in 1956-57.

Mr Starmer said: “After 13 years of his government, our economy needed major surgery, but like millions across our country, this budget leaves us stuck in the waiting room with only a sticking plaster to hand.

“A country set on a path of managed decline, falling behind our competitors, the sick man of Europe once again.”

The Queen’s death made her son a King, and a rich man – but where exactly does the cash come from? | UK News

When the Queen died, fortunes passed down the line of succession along with titles.

Her death made her eldest son a hugely rich man as well as King, while his heir secured a guaranteed income of more than £20m a year along with the title Prince of Wales.

The Royal Family is funded by a rackety collection of assets with roots in the Middle Ages, refined over time in deals with parliament, the most recent in 2012.

Nearly five-mile queue to see Queen – follow latest updates

Negotiated by George Osbourne, it guaranteed revenue streams for the monarch, their heir and the wider family, while leaving the question of tax largely voluntary.

The principal source of the King’s funding is the Sovereign Grant, calculated as 25% of the profits of the Crown Estate, a £15bn portfolio of commercial and residential property, agricultural and marine land owned by the Crown, not the individual monarch.

In 2021-22 it was worth £86.3m, of which £52m covered official travel, the cost of employing almost 500 members of the Royal Household, and maintenance of the Occupied Royal Palaces; Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, Clarence House, St James’s Palace, Kensington Palace, Marlborough House Mews and Hampton Court Mews.

The remaining £34m was allocated to an ongoing “re-servicing” of Buckingham Palace. The Sovereign Grant was increased from 15% of revenue to 25% in 2018 to cover the total cost of £369m over 10 years.

Handily for the monarch, the value of the Sovereign Grant cannot go down even if revenue falls, though that may be unlikely given its ownership of much of the UK seabed, on which lies hugely lucrative licences for offshore wind turbines will be granted in coming years.

Local dignitaries give three cheers to King Charles III following an Accession Proclamation Ceremony at Windsor Castle, publicly proclaiming King Charles III as the new monarch. Picture date: Sunday September 11, 2022.
Image:
The Sovereign’s Grant, that King Charles will inherit, pays for staff and maintenance at palaces including Windsor

No inheritance tax

King Charles will also draw income from the Privy Purse, made up primarily of the net revenue of the Duchy of Lancaster, a £600m portfolio of land and property assets worth £22.3m in 2020-21.

The Queen used this to cover the cost of expenses incurred by other members of the Royal Family including his siblings Prince Andrew, Princess Anne and Prince Edward, but not his heir.

The Queen also enjoyed private wealth estimated at more than £350m, including ownership of Balmoral and Sandringham. If, as presumed, the bulk of her wealth passes to King Charles, he uniquely will not have to pay inheritance tax on his new fortune.

Gifts from monarch to monarch are exempt from death duties, though bequests to her other children, or any other individuals or entities, will be taxable.

A swan is seen with the Kensington Palace in the background, in London, Britain June 28, 2021. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls
Image:
Kensington Palace

No probate for this will

We will never know the details, however, because the sovereign’s will remains sealed, the only will in the kingdom that does not have to pass into probate.

The Sovereign Grant is not taxed, but since 1993 the Queen has voluntarily paid income tax on revenue from the Duchy of Lancaster not used for official purposes. King Charles is yet to confirm he will do similarly.

As heir to the throne, Prince William, his wife and children will now benefit from the Duchy of Cornwall, a £1bn portfolio of agricultural land, property and investments that includes the Oval Cricket Ground & the Isles of Scilly.

Voluntary income tax

The estate paid the now-King £23m in the past financial year, earnings that are exempt from corporation and capital gains tax, and only subject to voluntary income tax on the net surplus after unspecified deductions.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex leave the National Service of Thanksgiving at St Paul's Cathedral, London, on day two of the Platinum Jubilee celebrations for Queen Elizabeth II. Picture date: Friday June 3, 2022.

Having decided to leave the working royal stable, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex now rely on trading off their talents and residual titles, with income from various media deals including a £20m book contract.

In a profound irony, Harry and Meghan have signed a reported $100m deal with Netflix, which owes much of its dominance in the streaming market to The Crown, a dramatisation that has done for the Windsors what Shakespeare did for the Plantagenets, and costs more to produce per-series than the annual Sovereign Grant.

None of these income streams cover the cost of royal security, widely estimated at more than £100m a year and borne by the taxpayer, or the price of royal visits often funded by local authorities.

Nor does the Royal Family pay for its own celebrations. The Treasury set aside an additional £28m to fund the recent Platinum Jubilee, the majority of which was spent on four-days of pageantry in central London.

Even with a conservative annual bill of £250m, the monarchy’s advocates argue they more than pay their way.

Does tourism foot the bill?

Tourism is routinely cited as their greatest benefit, yet revenue from the five royal palaces open to the public was just £9.4m last year, and only just exceeded £20m pre-COVID, and none are in the top 20 most visited popular attractions in Britain. With 1.5 million visitors, Windsor Castle ranked only 23rd, behind Chester Zoo, Stonehenge and Tate Modern.

Compare that with the appeal of Versailles, the palace of the long-gone French monarchy, which attracts almost 10 million visitors a year, and it suggests the UK’s palaces underperform.

Less quantifiable, but almost certainly more precious, is the brand value the Windsors bring to the UK. They lend Britain’s diplomats soft power and its businesses a unique selling point.

The Chateau de Versailles (Versailles palace) is seen on its reopening day in Versailles, near Paris, following the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in France, June 6, 2020. REUTERS/Charles Platiau
Image:
Paris’s Chateau de Versailles beats Britain’s palaces in the tourism numbers game

‘Don’t mess with the monarchy’

One FTSE 100 executive, recently returned from an investor tour of the US, remarked: “Don’t mess with the monarchy. After Brexit, and with all the dysfunctional politics, it’s about the only thing the rest of the world thinks still works in Britain.”

That lustre may even be enhanced by the Queen’s passing and the sustained display of pageantry and proclamation the past week has brought.

Weddings, divorces, defections and disgrace

She has been mourned around the world, with messages of goodwill from Beijing to Paris, and her funeral will take its place in the dramatic arc of weddings, divorces, defections and disgrace that have captured global attention throughout her reign.

King Charles, ascending at the height of a cost-of-living crisis and without the depth of goodwill enjoyed by his mother, will face greater scrutiny of his household and expenditure, not least how he will use at least eight palaces and private homes now available to him, and how many of the family will benefit.

Every CEO will tell you stability is the greatest asset of any business, and the Queen’s passing cannot but bring uncertainty, but The Firm’s income under Charles III is at least guaranteed.

And as the Elizabethan era ends with the first full state funeral of the colour TV age, the world will still be watching.

Whether the King can maintain the value of the Windsor stock, and public consent for the financial settlement, will be more a question of politics and philosophy than economics.

Watch and follow the Queen's funeral on TV, web and apps on Monday from 9am
Emma Raducanu’s earnings revealed as star makes Forbes’ world tennis rich list | UK News

British tennis sensation Emma Raducanu has been listed as one of the world’s highest-paid tennis players of 2022.

The 19-year-old US Open champion earned $21.1 million (£17.9m) over the last year and has made her debut on Forbes’ tennis earnings leader board.

The list includes the top 10 highest-paid tennis players, who have collectively earned $316 million (£267.5m) over the last year, on and off-court.

Raducanu, who shot to fame in 2021 becoming the first qualifier in the Open Era to secure a Grand Slam title, was ranked sixth on Forbes’ list.

Forbes reveals that Raducanu has earned $3.1 million (£2.6m) on-court and $18 million (£15.2m) off-court.

Since her win last year, Raducanu has signed multiple endorsement deals with big companies including British Airways, Dior, Evian, Nike and Tiffany.

Despite losing in the second round at Wimbledon this summer, earlier this month Raducanu thrashed Serena Williams in their first-ever meeting, winning 6-4, 6-0 in the first round at the Western and Southern Open in Cincinnati.

Before her win at the US Open Raducanu was ranked 150th in the world.

Emma Raducanu of Great Britain celebrates with the championship trophy after her match against Leylah Fernandez of Canada
Image:
Raducanu celebrates US Open win

Former world number one Roger Federer retained his place at the top of the list of the world’s highest-paid tennis players for the 17th year despite not playing a match for nearly 14 months.

Off-court Federer, 41, earned an eye-watering $90 million.

Read more:
Serena Williams announces plan to retire: ‘I’m evolving away from tennis’

Japan’s Naomi Osaka, who has won four majors, was ranked second after making around $56.2 million in the past year.

Williams, who has announced her plans to retire from the sport, was placed third earning $35.1 million, followed by Spain’s Rafael Nadal with $31.4 million and Novak Djokovic raking in $27.1 million.

Others on the top 10 Forbes list include Russia’s Daniil Medvedev earning a total of $19.3 million, Japan’s Kei Nishikori on $13.2 million, Venus Williams on $12 million and Carlos Alcaraz who earned $10.9 million.