Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
Labour enjoy ‘positive’ start to talks with business leaders over workers’ rights | Business News

Senior business leaders have welcomed discussions with Angela Rayner over proposals to improve workers’ rights as “positive”, but warned the “devil will be in the detail” of legislation due to be put before Parliament next month.

The deputy prime minister and business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, met the bosses of major employers including John Lewis, Octopus, BT, McDonald’s and Sainsbury’s in Whitehall on Tuesday, at the start of a consultation over the new government’s plans.

Labour’s manifesto promised to overhaul employment rights, with measures including the right for all “zero hours” workers to be offered a contract in line with their normal hours, and the extension of full employment rights to all workers from day one.

The meeting comes amid concern among employers and business groups that a reduction in flexibility as employers could increase costs and hamper their ability to drive growth.

Several businesses present told Sky News the atmosphere was constructive and friendly, with the emphasis on Ms Rayner and Mr Reynolds explaining what they have planned, and listening to the concerns of employers.

Business leaders are understood to be concerned over how the phasing out of zero-hours contracts will be achieved. It’s a key issue in the hospitality and retail sectors which employ large numbers of younger and part-time workers.

Ministers have proposed that every worker must be offered a contract reflecting typical hours worked over a 12-week period, but there is concern that metric could lock employers into hours irrespective of seasonal fluctuations.

Employers will argue for the hours to be calculated over a longer period to avoid distortions.

Businesses also argue that to extend the right from day one, they will need to impose longer probationary periods for new employees so they retain some flexibility.

Labour has promised to introduce legislation during its first 100 days in office, which gives them until 20 October, but are expected to continue consulting on measures beyond that date.

Ms Rayner and Mr Reynolds are understood not to have offered any specific timetable for changes they have billed as the biggest overhaul in a generation, but business leaders remain encouraged.

Read more from Sky News:
EY compiles women-dominated shortlist for top UK post
Pricing review promised after Oasis tickets row
Heavy rain forecast for UK

One said: “None of what Labour is proposing comes as a surprise and we respect that they have a mandate, but the practical delivery will be complex and we can help with it.

“The feeling is this was a positive sign that the government understands the need to consult with business on the things that affect us. The devil will be in the detail, but this was a good first step.”

Another described the atmosphere as friendly and said it was clear the ministers want to be seen to be working with rather than against business.

Ahead of the meeting, Ms Rayner said: “This government is pro-worker and pro-business, and we are committed to working with our brilliant businesses across the country to create a stronger, growing economy and to raise living standards as a result.”

King Charles’ first official portrait targeted by animal rights activists | UK News

Animal rights activists have targeted a portrait of the King, appearing to paste over his face with the animated character Wallace.

A speech bubble, reading, “No cheese Gromit. Look at all this cruelty on RSPCA farms,” was also put onto the painting at the Philip Mould gallery in central London.

It was the first official portrait of The King, by artist Jonathan Yeo, since the coronation, which was unveiled at Buckingham Palace last month.

Pic: Animal Rising/Jonathan Yeo 2024/Reuters
Image:
Pic: Animal Rising/Jonathan Yeo 2024/Reuters

Animal Rising said two of its supporters were responsible for the stunt, saying the artwork was targeted because of the King’s love of the British stop-motion Wallace and Gromit comedy franchise created by Nick Park and his status as Royal Patron of the RSPCA.

In a post on the group’s website Daniel Juniper, one of those involved, said they wanted to draw his attention to alleged cruelty reported on RSPCA-assured farms.

Pic:Animal Rising
Image:
Pic: Animal Rising

“Even though we hope this is amusing to his Majesty, we also call on him to seriously reconsider if he wants to be associated with the awful suffering across farms being endorsed by the RSPCA,” he said.

“Charles has made it clear he is sensitive to the suffering of animals in UK farms; now is the perfect time for him to step up and call on the RSPCA to drop the assured scheme and tell the truth about animal farming.”

A video posted on social media site X shows two protesters approaching the painting before attaching the posters using paint rollers, then walking away.

The portrait shows the King wearing the uniform of the Welsh Guards, which he was made regimental colonel of in 1975, and was originally commissioned in 2020 to mark his 50 years as a member of The Draper’s Company in 2022.

The King sat for Mr Yeo on four occasions between June 2021 and November 2023 at both Highgrove in Gloucestershire and Clarence House in London.

The renowned portrait artist’s past subjects include Idris Elba, Cara Delevingne, Sir David Attenborough, Nicole Kidman, Malala Yousafzai, and former prime ministers Sirs David Cameron and Tony Blair.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Eddie Izzard says ‘trans rights are human rights. End of story’ as she stars in Doctor Jekyll remake | Ents & Arts News

Eddie Izzard says the majority of people she meets on the streets are “positive” and “accepting” of her as a transgender woman.

The comedian and actor, who also goes by the name Suzy, first came out as trans back in 1985.

Now, nearly 40 years later, Eddie is taking on her first lead trans role in Hammer horror Doctor Jekyll.

But while society may be in a very different place to the turbulent mid-80s, with much more understanding around LGBTQ+ issues, Eddie says it’s not all plain sailing.

“The world is more accepting. The extreme right is not more accepting. The extreme right is setting up culture wars. But most people in the streets… they’re saying, ‘Good for you, be your authentic self. I think you’re looking great,’ and hopefully I’m looking okay.”

She says the majority of people display a “live and let live” attitude, recognising it as an “honest” expression of “what’s inside”.

She goes on: “And we’re talking about mental health and the wellbeing of people, societies, our communities, our country, our continent, our world. Surely this has got to be better than where the right wing are saying, ‘No, set women’s rights against trans rights. Have them fight now’?

“No, women’s rights are human rights and trans rights are human rights. End of story.”

Eddie is taking on her first lead trans role in Hammer horror Doctor Jekyll.
Image:
Izzard stars as trans woman Doctor Jekyll

With trans issues a hot-button topic right now, they are conversations Eddie is likely to have with potential voters – as aside from performing and extreme sports, Eddie is also politically active.

She is standing to be Labour’s parliamentary candidate for Brighton Pavilion (she was unsuccessful last year in her bid to become Labour’s candidate for Sheffield Central).

She remains clear that the overall message on the street is one of support: “There are some people who are hateful, some people are transphobic, but they are a minority and maybe things are spiking at the moment, but we will pass through this time and then we will get to better times in the future.”

A sign of such change, with trans issues starting to make their way into mainstream media, is the 61-year-old’s latest project – a retelling of Robert Louis Stevenson’s novella The Strange Case Of Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde, in which Dr Jekyll is a trans woman.

Click to subscribe to Backstage wherever you get your podcasts

Directed by Joe Stephenson, Eddie says it was an open-gender casting and both men and women were seen for the part.

And while it was a challenge playing two roles in one, she says the fact that scientist Nina Jekyll was trans was incidental to the role.

Read more:
Eddie Izzard clears up her pronouns and says ‘no one can really get it wrong’
Eddie Izzard launches bid to become Labour MP in Brighton

“As an acting role it’s fantastic because hopefully, as people are watching the scenes, they can’t quite tell who is controlling this trans woman, which way she going. But the fact that she’s trans, it doesn’t matter. It’s just happens to be there.”

Now, in the 21st century, we should be beyond lazy stereotyping, Izzard says, citing LGBTQ casting as a case in point.

“[Often] if you’re a gay character, you’ve got to have a gay problem. With a lesbian, have a lesbian problem. No, you don’t have to do that. Just have a life because we’re all living lives, we’re all real people.”

Doctor Jekyll is in cinemas now.

Eddie Izzard says ‘trans rights are human rights. End of story’ as he stars in Doctor Jekyll remake | Ents & Arts News

Eddie Izzard says the majority of people she meets on the streets are “positive” and “accepting” of her as a transgender woman.

The comedian and actor, who also goes by the name Suzy, first came out as trans back in 1985.

Now, nearly 40 years later, Eddie is taking on her first lead trans role in Hammer horror Doctor Jekyll.

But while society may be in a very different place to the turbulent mid-80s, with much more understanding around LGBTQ+ issues, Eddie says it’s not all plain sailing.

“The world is more accepting. The extreme right is not more accepting. The extreme right is setting up culture wars. But most people in the streets… they’re saying, ‘Good for you, be your authentic self. I think you’re looking great,’ and hopefully I’m looking okay.”

She says the majority of people display a “live and let live” attitude, recognising it as an “honest” expression of “what’s inside”.

She goes on: “And we’re talking about mental health and the wellbeing of people, societies, our communities, our country, our continent, our world. Surely this has got to be better than where the right wing are saying, ‘No, set women’s rights against trans rights. Have them fight now’?

“No, women’s rights are human rights and trans rights are human rights. End of story.”

Eddie is taking on her first lead trans role in Hammer horror Doctor Jekyll.
Image:
Izzard stars as trans woman Doctor Jekyll

With trans issues a hot-button topic right now, they are conversations Eddie is likely to have with potential voters – as aside from performing and extreme sports, Eddie is also politically active.

She is standing to be Labour’s parliamentary candidate for Brighton Pavilion (she was unsuccessful last year in her bid to become Labour’s candidate for Sheffield Central).

She remains clear that the overall message on the street is one of support: “There are some people who are hateful, some people are transphobic, but they are a minority and maybe things are spiking at the moment, but we will pass through this time and then we will get to better times in the future.”

A sign of such change, with trans issues starting to make their way into mainstream media, is the 61-year-old’s latest project – a retelling of Robert Louis Stevenson’s novella The Strange Case Of Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde, in which Dr Jekyll is a trans woman.

Click to subscribe to Backstage wherever you get your podcasts

Directed by Joe Stephenson, Eddie says it was an open-gender casting and both men and women were seen for the part.

And while it was a challenge playing two roles in one, she says the fact that scientist Nina Jekyll was trans was incidental to the role.

Read more:
Eddie Izzard clears up her pronouns and says ‘no one can really get it wrong’
Eddie Izzard launches bid to become Labour MP in Brighton

“As an acting role it’s fantastic because hopefully, as people are watching the scenes, they can’t quite tell who is controlling this trans woman, which way she going. But the fact that she’s trans, it doesn’t matter. It’s just happens to be there.”

Now, in the 21st century, we should be beyond lazy stereotyping, Izzard says, citing LGBTQ casting as a case in point.

“[Often] if you’re a gay character, you’ve got to have a gay problem. With a lesbian, have a lesbian problem. No, you don’t have to do that. Just have a life because we’re all living lives, we’re all real people.”

Doctor Jekyll is in cinemas now.

Grand National ‘a disgrace’: Animal rights groups call for jump racing ban after three horses die at Aintree | UK News

Animal rights campaigners are calling for jump racing to be banned after three horses died at Aintree – with one suffering a broken neck during the Grand National.

Protesters had tried and failed to stop yesterday’s race from going ahead, and a total of 118 people were arrested.

Animal Aid says action must be taken to prevent the “brutal horrors” at Aintree Racecourse from happening again.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Grand National protester arrested

Dene Stansall, the campaign group’s horse racing consultant, said: “Innocent racehorses’ lives taken from them in the name of entertainment and gambling.

“Aintree, the worst of all racecourses, is a disgrace and the Jockey Club and British racing should hang their hands in utter shame at what we have seen over the past three days.”

The chief executive of the British Horseracing Authority – Julie Harrington – said the sporting body works “tirelessly” to improve safety records and reduce risk.

Offering her condolences to those linked to the horses who died this week, she added: “Every incident is reviewed by the BHA alongside the racecourse and other bodies.

“As a sport, we have for years shown great determination and commitment to improve welfare standards by taking measured scientific, evidence-based, regulatory and education-based steps.”

Read more:
Opinion – ‘I loved the Grand National until I saw what I saw’

But given 62 horses have died at the Aintree Festival since 2000 – with 16 killed in the Grand National – critics argue that the safety measures in place don’t go far enough.

The League Against Cruel Sports also wants whips to be banned because they push horses beyond what they can safely do, and says this weekend’s events show change is needed.

Spokesperson Emma Judd said: “One death is too many. Animal welfare needs to be put before gambling profits and entertainment, and steps need to be taken to end this carnage which is occurring year after year.”

She went on to call for an independent regulator that prioritises horse welfare.

Other animal welfare groups – including Peta UK – described the Grand National race as “one of the longest and most hazardous in the world”.

It is now urging the public to put pressure on the event’s sponsors so they withdraw financial support.

In a statement, Peta UK said notorious fences such as the Chair, Becher’s Brook and the Canal Turn cause “horrific and often fatal injuries” almost every year.

“Every time horses are forced to jump over these excessively high obstacles, it puts tremendous pressure on their slender front legs and they risk broken legs, necks and backs,” it added.

“Even those who make it off the track alive are likely to suffer. Thousands of horses – including ‘spent’ thoroughbreds and those who don’t ‘make the grade’ – are discarded like used betting slips every year.”

Envoye Special died on Thursday, followed by Dark Raven in an early race on Saturday. Hill Sixteen was put down after suffering serious injuries during the flagship event.

Dickon White, who runs Aintree Racecourse, said: “Hill Sixteen was immediately attended by expert veterinary professionals during the Grand National, but sadly sustained a fatal injury. Our heartfelt condolences are with his connections.”

Animal Rising – which spearheaded Saturday’s protest – has suggested that its work is only beginning, and that it intends to start an “unignorable national conversation”.

About 15 of its demonstrators managed to delay the start of the race by 12 minutes, while others caused extensive traffic by gluing themselves to the M57 motorway.

Animal Rising activists attempting to invade the race course ahead of the Randox Grand National Handicap Chase

Some racegoers have said they disagree with the group’s tactics.

Alice Pocock, from Berkshire, said: “Every horse here is born and bred to race. I think the protesters are putting themselves at harm and they don’t understand the racing industry.”

UK government ‘avoiding asylum responsibilities’ with new proposals to clamp down on Channel migrant crossings, says human rights group | UK News

The UK government is “avoiding the asylum responsibilities it expects others to take” with new plans to clamp down on small boat crossings, a human rights group has said.

Refugee charities have also described the plans as “costly and unworkable” and said they “promise nothing but more demonisation and punishment” of asylum seekers.

It comes as Home Secretary Suella Braverman is set to publish long-promised legislation as early as Tuesday.

A ban on people who come to the UK illegally from claiming asylum is believed to be among the proposals being put forward in a new Illegal Migration Bill.

Government minister Chris Heaton-Harris said on Sunday that the legislation will ensure people who come to the UK illegally “are returned very quickly” or to another country such as Rwanda.

Rishi Sunak has made stopping Channel migrant crossings one of his five priorities in office, promising to introduce new laws to “make sure that if you come to this country illegally, you are detained and swiftly removed”.

Several Tory MPs welcomed the news that a new bill was imminent, with Tory MP Danny Kruger calling it a “serious plan” on BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour.

More on Migrant Crossings

But the plans have been criticised, including by Labour, who have accused the government of “recycling the same rhetoric and failure”.

Suella Braverman
Image:
Home Secretary Suella Braverman

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said: “The Conservatives are responsible for an abysmal failure to tackle the huge increase in dangerous small boat crossings and the criminal gangs who are putting lives at risk and undermining border security.

“Ministers have made countless claims and promises yet the facts show their last law badly failed and made things worse.”

She said Labour was calling for a major new cross-border police unit to go after the criminal gangs, fast track asylum decisions and returns, and urged the government to reach “proper return agreements” with France and other countries, including Belgium.

Read more:
Channel people smuggler reveals how illicit trade works
People smugglers ‘investing profits in UK businesses’

The Liberal Democrats said ministers had drawn up “another half-baked plan”, while on Sunday, trade unions accused the government of being “complicit” in a rise in far-right organised violence and intimidation against refugees.

Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, said plans to deny those crossing in small boats the ability to claim asylum would “shatter the UK’s long-standing commitment under the UN Convention to give people a fair hearing regardless of the path they have taken to reach our shores”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why do migrants cross the Channel?

He also said the plans would “add more cost and chaos to the system”.

Steve Valdez-Symonds, Amnesty International UK’s refugee and migrant rights director, accused the government of presenting “the very same disastrous plan to simply avoid the asylum responsibilities it expects others to take”.

He also said the government’s proposals “promise nothing but more demonisation and punishment of people fleeing conflict and persecution who dare to seek asylum in the UK by means to which government has chosen to restrict them.”

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Sunday vowed to put an end to “immoral” illegal migration.

Click to subscribe to the Sophy Ridge on Sunday podcast

Speaking to the Sunday Express, he said: “Illegal migration is not fair on British taxpayers, it is not fair on those who come here legally and it is not right that criminal gangs should be allowed to continue their immoral trade.

“I’m determined to deliver on my promise to stop the boats.

“So make no mistake, if you come here illegally, you will not be able to stay.”

A report in The Sunday Times said the Home Office had drawn up two plans to stop people arriving via small boats from claiming asylum – either withdrawing the right to appeal against automatic exclusion from the asylum system, or only allowing them to appeal after they have been deported.

A third proposal would prevent people from using the Human Rights Act to prevent their deportations, such as by claiming their right to family life.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Heaton-Harris on PM’s proposed new laws on migrant crossings

The legislation could also see a duty placed on the home secretary to remove “as soon as reasonably practicable” anyone who arrives on a small boat, either to Rwanda or a “safe third country”.

Cabinet minister Chris Heaton-Harris told Sky News’ Sophy Ridge On Sunday programme that the new laws would be “very black and white” and “safe and legal routes are certainly the way forward”.

However, questions have been raised about how any such legislation, based on the details known so far, could be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

The government’s previous Rwanda scheme became mired in legal challenges, with so far no flights carrying migrants to the Rwandan capital Kigali departing.

The latest Home Office figures show 2,950 migrants have crossed the Channel already this year, while a record 45,756 migrants were recorded to have arrived in the UK last year.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘People smuggling is just another job’

A Home Office spokesperson said: “The Home Secretary has been clear that if you arrive in the UK illegally, you should not be allowed to stay.

“We will shortly introduce legislation which will ensure that people arriving in the UK illegally are detained and promptly returned to their home country or a safe third country.

“Our work with France is also vital to tackling the unacceptable rise in dangerous Channel crossings. We share a determination to tackle this issue together, head-on, to stop the boats.”

Rishi Sunak vows to clear immigration backlog – but dodges questions on leaving European Convention on Human Rights | Politics News

Rishi Sunak has repeatedly refused to say whether the UK would have to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to deliver his government’s plan for removing asylum seekers who arrive illegally.

Making his debut appearance at the Commons Liaison Committee, the prime minister was asked by the SNP’s Joanna Cheery whether the UK would have to derogate from the ECHR to fulfil his proposals to curb immigration.

“You will see the legislation next year and no doubt we will have the opportunity to debate it then but I wouldn’t want to speculate on that now,” he said.

Mr Sunak said he welcomes the High Court’s ruling on Monday that the government’s policy of removing asylum seekers to Rwanda is lawful.

He told MPs he believes the plans will help tackle the problem of small boats crossing the Channel.

Nurses launch second day of strikes – live politics updates

But the PM refused to be drawn on whether the government’s Rwanda policy would require changes to the Human Rights Act or the UK’s commitment to the ECHR.

Both Home Secretary Suella Braverman and Justice Secretary Dominic Raab have said the government may have to consider withdrawing from the ECHR to press ahead successfully with the government’s plans.

“We expect further legal challenge. We will continue to pursue that as necessary,” he said.

“I believe the Rwanda scheme represents an important part of our plan to tackle illegal migration and stop small boats. It is not the only part of it but it is an important part of it. That is why I welcome the court decision yesterday.

“We will introduce legislation in the new year that will achieve the aim I set out. I am confident that we can deliver on that plan and it will make a difference and reduce the number of boats arriving.”

On Monday, Lord Justice Lewis said in his ruling that the controversial policy, introduced under Boris Johnson, was “consistent with the refugee convention”.

However, he said the home secretary should look at people’s “particular circumstances” before deporting them to the central African country.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Braverman defends Rwanda plan

Making a statement in the Commons after the judgment, the home secretary said the Rwanda policy is a “humane” and “practical alternative” for those who come to the UK through “dangerous, illegal and unnecessary routes”.

“Being relocated to Rwanda is not a punishment, but an innovative way of addressing a major problem to redress the imbalance between illegal and legal migration routes,” she told MPs.

The government announced its Rwanda policy back in April, which would see some asylum seekers who had reached the UK via small boat Channel crossings deported to the country to have their cases processed.

Ms Patel said it would help deter people from making the dangerous journey, but human rights campaigners, charities and opposition parties condemned the plan as inhumane.

PM evasive as he faces questions on immigration

The PM avoided directly answering questions about immigration.

Diana Johnson asked how many small boat crossings he expects next year, whether anyone will be waiting more than 6 months for an asylum claims and how many will be sent to Rwanda, but the PM wouldn’t set specific targets, saying the issues “can’t be solved overnight”.

While the court decision yesterday that the Rwanda plan is legal was a win for the government, the plan being workable relies on swift action.

The home office being potentially dragged to court over every Rwanda deportation case makes it very hard for the policy hard to work as a deterrent.

Rishi Sunak knows it’s an issue that chimes with many voters and Tory MPs, something he said is a personal priority.

He pledged last week to “abolish” the immigration backlog, to achieve something his predecessors tried and failed to.

The PM may not be setting himself any targets today, but images of small boats arriving on the Kent coast will speak for themselves.

The first flight was set to take off in June with four people on board, but was halted after a number of legal challenges and the European Court of Human Rights ruling the plan carried “a real risk of irreversible harm”.

However, both Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss insisted they would push ahead with the policy when they took the keys to Number 10.

Meanwhile, the PM also told the Commons Liaison Committee that he was committed to abolishing the backlog of 92,000 asylum claims – as it stood at the end of June 2022 – by the end of the year.

However, the current backlog stands at 117,00.

“I think it would represent one of the most significant reductions in the backlog we have seen. If we can go further I would absolutely love to,” he said.

JK Rowling calls Nicola Sturgeon ‘destroyer of women’s rights’ – as author backs protests over Scotland’s new trans law | UK News

JK Rowling has tweeted a picture of herself in a T-shirt that calls Scotland’s first minister a “destroyer of women’s rights”.

The author also gave her support to people protesting over a new gender recognition law in the country.

She posted: “I stand in solidarity with @ForWomenScot and all women protesting and speaking outside the Scottish Parliament. #NoToSelfID.”

The legislation aims to amend a previous law to make it easier for transgender people to be legally recognised as their chosen gender and get a new birth certificate.

They will no longer need to provide medical reports or evidence, and the minimum age of applicants for a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) will be cut from 18 to 16.

A majority of MSPs on a parliamentary committee have recommended that the general principles of the Gender Recognition Reform Bill should be approved.

Scotland’s social justice secretary has said it won’t give trans people new rights but is about “simplifying and improving the process for a trans person to gain legal recognition”.

In a statement, Shona Robison said: “Our support for trans rights does not conflict with our continued strong commitment to uphold the rights and protections that women and girls currently have under the 2010 Equality Act. This bill makes no changes to that act.”

People protested against the planned law outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh on Thursday.

Some carried signs reading “no one was born in the wrong body”, “humans can’t change sex” and “keep prisons single sex”.

Former Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont said the committee “should listen, they should challenge, they should argue, they should probe”.

She added: “They should not dismiss, because in that world of dismissal, you shoot the messenger. You ignore the message, you make bad law and other people live with the consequences.”

Rowling has been criticised by some over her views on women’s rights and trans people but strongly denies being transphobic.

In January, police said they wouldn’t charge trans activists who tweeted photos showing her address – so-called “doxing”.