Search for:
kralbetz.com1xbit güncelTipobet365Anadolu Casino GirişMariobet GirişSupertotobet mobil girişBetistbahis.comSahabetTarafbetMatadorbethack forumBetturkeyXumabet GirişrestbetbetpasGonebetBetticketTrendbetistanbulbahisbetixirtwinplaymegaparifixbetzbahisalobetaspercasino1winorisbetbetkom
Post Office scandal: At least 8 convictions may be linked to second IT system used by Post Office | UK News

At least eight convictions predating the Horizon Post Office scandal are being looked at by the body investigating potential miscarriages of justice, Sky News has learned.

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has confirmed it is examining multiple cases of former sub-postmasters affected by Capture software.

The computer accounting system was used in the early 1990s, prior to Horizon being introduced to Post Office branches from 1999 onwards.

Horizon was at the centre of the Post Office scandal and saw hundreds of sub-postmasters wrongly convicted of stealing from their branches.

The Kroll report, commissioned by the government earlier this year, found that Capture had bugs and glitches and there was a reasonable likelihood it had caused cash shortfalls too.

Lord Beamish, the former Labour MP Kevan Jones, has been supporting victims and is calling for the government to extend current legislation to automatically quash convictions.

The Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act was passed in May but does not include Capture victims.

More on Post Office Scandal

Lord Beamish told Sky News he has raised the issue with the Justice Secretary and called for a House of Lords debate.

“The government are going to have to take this seriously,” he said. “We can’t have a situation where we have a two-tier system where people get exonerated from Horizon and the Capture cases are either forgotten or have to go through a very lengthy legal process to get their names cleared.”

Chris Roberts whose mother Liz Roberts who was convicted in 1999 of stealing £46,000 from the Post Office and spent 13 months behind bars. Her conviction relates to the use of Post Office Capture software (precursor to Horizon) which is being investigated in connection with potential miscarriages of justice
Image:
Chris claims his mother was wrongly jailed because of accounting problems with the Post Office software Capture

He added he had “little faith” in the CCRC’s “ability to deal with cases”, after multiple Horizon cases were referred to the body years ago.

“The problem with these cases is the lack of evidence… that has been destroyed or lost so actually proving some of these cases through that process will be very difficult.

“Therefore I think a blanket exoneration like we had with Horizon I think has got to be discussed and considered for these cases.”

The CCRC told Sky News it has five cases under review “in which the Capture IT system could be a factor”.

It also said it is “seeking further information” on eight cases referenced in the Kroll report.

Read more:
Woman who died after conviction may have suffered miscarriage of justice
Former postmaster says compensation offer is ‘insulting’
Post Office chairman ousted amid row with government

The CCRC added that the time taken for a case review to be completed was dependent on the “complexity” of each case “and how readily available information about it is”. In a statement, it admitted: “The availability of information can be a particular hurdle in older cases.”

Chris Roberts and his mother Liz Roberts who was convicted in 1999 of stealing £46,000 from the Post Office and spent 13 months behind bars. Liz was in the advanced stages of Alzheimer’s disease and died in 2024. Her conviction relates to the use of Post Office Capture software (precursor to Horizon) which is being investigated in connection with potential miscarriages of justice
Image:
Chris’s mother died earlier this year following a battle with Alzheimer’s and never got to clear her name

Chris Roberts’ mother, Liz Roberts, was convicted in 1999 of stealing £46,000 from the Post Office and spent 13 months behind bars.

Liz, who was in the advanced stages of Alzheimer’s disease, passed away earlier this year.

Chris said she was jailed four days before he turned 17, and he used to have “nightmares” that she was “going to die in there”.

“There was no evidence of any financial gain because they went through everything. And obviously the money wasn’t in our accounts because it didn’t exist,” he added.

Despite being offered “three deals” by the Post Office to plead guilty, Liz refused and was sent to prison.

Liz Roberts who was convicted in 1999 of stealing £46,000 from the Post Office and spent 13 months behind bars. Liz was in the advanced stages of Alzheimer’s disease and died in 2024. Her conviction relates to the use of Post Office Capture software (precursor to Horizon) which is being investigated in connection with potential miscarriages of justice
Image:
Liz Roberts during happier times before she was jailed for theft – her son insists she was innocent

Chris believes that the 2019 High Court win by Horizon victims was a missed opportunity for the Post Office to look back at Capture cases.

“It would have been worth something then because my mum would have died knowing that everybody else knew she was innocent,” he said.

“My dad would have died knowing that the love of his life wasn’t vilified as a criminal.”

Chris wants his mother exonerated and “those actively responsible” to “stand up in court… and justify themselves”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s Adele Robinson examines Britain’s biggest miscarriages of justice

A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said: “We were horrified to learn about the issues with the Capture system and are working closely across government to thoroughly examine Kroll’s independent report and consider what action should be taken.

“We continue to listen to postmasters and others who have been sharing their views on the report’s findings since its publication last month.”

Kemi Badenoch says partygate scandal was ‘overblown’ | Politics News

The new Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said the partygate scandal was “overblown” and the government should not have fined people for “everyday activities” during lockdown.

Ms Badenoch, who won the battle to replace Rishi Sunak on Saturday, said the public was “not wrong to be upset about partygate” – when those working in Downing Street held parties during COVID lockdowns.

However, she said she thought partygate was “overblown” and the Conservative government should not have created fixed penalty notices for disobeying COVID restrictions.

“The problem was that we should not have criminalised everyday activities the way that we did,” the North West Essex MP told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme.

“People going out for walks, all of them having fixed penalty notices. That was what ended up creating a trap for Boris Johnson.”

Politics latest: Chancellor admits she was ‘wrong’ to say taxes would not have to rise

The scandal saw Mr Johnson fined for attending a party in Downing Street, one of several that took place under his tenure in breach of Covid lockdown regulations.

She said it was staff in Downing Street disobeying the rules that ended up with Mr Johnson, who was prime minister at the time, and then chancellor Mr Sunak being fined.

“People in government didn’t obey the rules, but they were not MPs,” she said.

“They were often staffers and I think that’s the way that we had created those regulations, ended up entrapping [Boris Johnson].”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Badenoch: ‘We let standards slip’

Ms Badenoch resigned from Mr Johnson’s government in 2022 but said she thought he was “a great prime minister”, however, there were “some serious issues which were not being resolved” which made the public think “we were in it for ourselves”.

After Mr Johnson was fined for going to his own birthday party in Downing Street, he said: “In all frankness, at that time it did not occur to me that this might have been a breach of the rules.”

Ellie Reeves, chair of the Labour Party, said Ms Badenoch calling partygate “overblown” will “add insult to injury for families across Britain who followed the rules, missing loved one’s deaths and family funerals, whilst her colleagues partied in Downing Street”.

Speaking after winning the leadership campaign, Ms Badenoch said the Conservative party needs to be honest about the mistakes it made that led to it losing July’s election.

“Our party is critical to the success of our country,” Ms Badenoch said.

“But to be heard, we have to be honest, honest about the fact that we made mistakes, honest about the fact that we let standards slip.

“The time has come to tell the truth, to stand up for our principles, to plan for our future, to reset our politics and our thinking, and to give our party and our country the new start that they deserve.

“It is time to get down to business. It is time to renew.”

Read more:
Combative past of new Tory leader
Who is Kemi Badenoch’s husband?

Pic: GB News/PA
Image:
Pic: GB News/PA

Ms Badenoch is in the process of choosing her new shadow cabinet and is understood to want her top team to be in place by Tuesday.

She previously suggested all those who ran to be leader against her should be included.

However, James Cleverly said on Friday he would be returning to the backbenches after coming third in the contest.

Rishi Sunak says he is not being investigated in betting scandal probe | Politics News

Rishi Sunak has said he is not being investigated by the Gambling Commission as part of its probe into bets placed on the date of the election.

The prime minister also said the Conservatives would conduct their own internal investigation into the allegations that have dogged the latter part of his campaign.

Speaking to reporters in Edinburgh, Mr Sunak said his party “will act” if the Conservatives’ own inquiry into the alleged betting scandal finds wrongdoing.

“The Gambling Commission is independent of government – it’s independent of me,” he said.

“I don’t have the details of their investigation, right? They don’t report to me, I don’t have the details, but what I can tell you is, in parallel we’ve been conducting our own internal inquiries and of course will act on any relevant findings or information from that and pass it on to the Gambling Commission.”

Follow live general election updates

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Home secretary quizzed over betting scandal

When asked whether he had ever bet on politics whilst being an MP, Mr Sunak replied: “No.”

The prime minister, who also ruled out any of his family members’ alleged involvement, is in Scotland to help Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross launch the party’s manifesto.

Speaking before the visit, Mr Sunak said the Scottish Conservatives are “sending the nationalists the strongest message possible that the people of Scotland want to move on from their independence obsession”.

The Conservative campaign has been plunged into crisis over claims several people associated with the party placed bets on the date of the general election.

Read more
Bookies to reveal election bets £20 and above
Another top Tory being investigated

Craig Williams admitted to betting on the election date. Pic: PA
Image:
Craig Williams admitted to betting on the election date. Pic: PA

Laura Saunders is the party’s candidate in Bristol North West.
Pic: Laura Saunders for Bristol North West
Image:
Laura Saunders is the party’s candidate in Bristol North West.
Pic: Laura Saunders for Bristol North West

Craig Williams, Mr Sunak’s parliamentary private secretary and Tory candidate in Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr, admitted to placing a “flutter” on the date of the election and is facing an investigation.

Tony Lee, the party’s director of campaigns, and his wife Laura Saunders, the Tory candidate for Bristol North West, are also under investigation.

👉 Click here to follow Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts 👈

Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris has rejected calls including from within Tory ranks for those facing an investigation to have the party whip withdrawn while the probe is ongoing.

Windrush scandal: Campaigners demand citizenship for all victims in first 100 days of new government | UK News

Windrush campaigners are calling on the next government to grant citizenship to all victims of the immigration scandal in the first 100 days after the election.

Campaigners including Action for Race Equality (ARE) have warned that the current compensation and documentation scheme is “unwieldy” and in need of desperate reform.

This comes as Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has said that justice for the Windrush community “has taken far too long” as he promised a “fundamental reset” for the Windrush generation.

Sir Keir said the Windrush generation, who arrived 76 years ago on HMT Empire Windrush, in Tilbury, Essex, represented the “best of Britain” as his party vowed sweeping reform, including appointing a Windrush commissioner, to help them.

The Windrush scandal refers to migrants from the Caribbean who started to arrive in 1948 to help rebuild Britain after the war.

They were given the right to live and work in Britain permanently but many were later wrongly deemed illegal immigrants.

Windrush
Image:
Many people who arrived from the Caribbean on HMT Empire Windrush lost their UK jobs and homes. Pic: AP

As a result of the scandal, a Windrush Scheme for Documentation was established in 2018 so those impacted were able to retrieve their documents and demonstrate their right to citizenship.

The Home Office estimates that more than 16,800 people have been provided with their documents through the scheme.

However, ARE says a third of those who have received documents are from EU countries and claims more than 57,000 people impacted by the Windrush scandal may still be eligible.

The charity has also criticised the Windrush Compensation Scheme which the Home Office says has paid out £85.86m across 2,382 claims, as of March.

Jeremy Crook OBE, chief executive, Action for Race Equality
Image:
Jeremy Crook OBE, chief executive, Action for Race Equality

But Jeremy Crook OBE, ARE chief executive, believes almost 4,000 claims were rejected and says it is likely because the 44-page long application is “very bureaucratic” and “onerous”.

“Our manifesto calls for legal aid to be put in place by the next government,” says Mr Crook.

‘A fundamental reset’

Labour have said that, if elected, they’re going to streamline the initial applications for compensation, speed up payouts and implement the recommendations which Wendy Williams made in her independent Windrush Lessons Learned Review.

Sir Keir said: “The Windrush generation embodies the best of Britain: determination, spirit, public service and graft.

“But instead of being thanked, they’ve been badly mistreated.

“A Labour government will offer a fundamental reset moment for the Windrush generation, with respect and dignity at its very core.”

He promised “urgent reform” of the compensation system and to restore the Windrush Unit to the Home Office along with appointing a Windrush commissioner to be “the voice of families affected”.

He added: “Justice has taken far too long for the Windrush community.

“A government that I lead won’t let this happen again. Where the Tories have dragged their feet, I am determined to get money out the door to compensate those who were failed by the state.”

‘I still think they’re gonna come for me’

Shane Smith spent almost his entire life in the UK before he was told he had no right to be in the country
Image:
Shane Smith spent almost his entire life in the UK before he was told he had no right to be in the country

Shane Smith, 44, was born in Trinidad and Tobago, but was brought to the UK by his British mum when he was just four months old.

He was at work, in his early thirties, when he was told he had no right to remain in the only place he knew as home.

“I was dragged into the office and they were like, you’ve got an immigration issue,” says Mr Smith.

“I said, ‘Can’t you hear my voice? I’m a scouser!’ That’s when everything fell apart.”

He lost his job as a result of the scandal and it took him years to obtain the documents he needed to be granted the citizenship he was already entitled to.

Mr Smith became homeless as a result of work insecurities, and years later is still battling with mental health issues.

“I just felt alone, I couldn’t provide for my family anymore… I’m embarrassed, because I am a proud man, and before this I thought I was very, very strong,” says Mr Smith.

“I still think they’re gonna come for me.”

Although he may be entitled to compensation, Mr Smith hasn’t yet applied for the scheme, as he believes the process does not consider the complex lives created by the scandal.

Read more from Sky News:
Starmer makes ‘Swift pit stop’… at the Eras Tour
Heatwave could hit UK next week – but there’s a catch
Farage says West ‘provoked’ Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

“I’ve got to go through a dossier and provide all this stuff, when half the time I was homeless,” he says.

He says when he received the compensation booklet, he couldn’t face going through the paperwork.

“I just threw it in the bin.”

Mr Smith also says even if he found the mental strength to fill it out, he’s not sure he could accept the money based on principles.

“If I accept it, it’s just like saying what you did to me is fine, and you are okay doing that to anyone else,” he says.

It’s this “lack of faith” in the government’s ability to right the wrongs of the scandal that has inspired ARE, which is also calling upon the incoming government to establish a Windrush covenant for mental health.

‘Tawdry’ Conservative Party’s campaign is marred by election betting scandal, Ruth Davidson says | Politics News

The Conservative Party is seen as “sleazy” and “grubby”, Ruth Davidson has said, as two of its candidates are being investigated over alleged bets placed on the election date.

The Gambling Commission is looking into two Tory candidates over alleged wagers on the date of the 4 July election.

An industry source has told Sky News that “more names” are being looked into, but police are so far “not involved”.

Speaking on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast with Sky News political editor Beth Rigby, and former broadcaster and presenter Carol Vorderman, the former leader of the Scottish Tories waded into the fallout of the alleged betting scandal.

👉 Click here to follow Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts 👈

“What an absolute shit show. Firstly, I mean, how tawdry is it?” she said.

She described it as akin to “insider trading” and criticised Rishi Sunak’s response, saying he had repeatedly failed to get out in front and take control of events.

Speaking on the podcast, Ms Vorderman added: “The Tory party as they stand is just sleazy, it’s grubby.

“And it has gone on and on and on.

“From outside the Westminster bubble, whatever Sunak says, people now openly laugh at Tory politicians whenever they’re out of your studio Beth.

“Whenever they’re in front of an audience they don’t command any respect whatsoever.”

The trio also discussed tactical voting and why candidates target some seats more than others.

Tory candidates Craig Williams and Laura Saunders are both under investigation. Ms Saunders is married to the party’s director of campaigns Tony Lee.

Laura Saunders is the party’s candidate in Bristol North West.
Pic: Laura Saunders for Bristol North West
Image:
Laura Saunders is the party’s candidate in Bristol North West.
Pic: Laura Saunders for Bristol North West

Read more:
Sunak ‘incredibly angry’ over betting allegations
Former Tory minister says he’ll vote Labour
Green co-leader rejects Liz Truss comparison

It also emerged this week that one of Mr Sunak’s close protection police officers has been arrested over alleged bets on the timing of the election as well.

During a leader’s event on BBC Question Time, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said he was “incredibly angry” to learn of the allegations and said if anyone had broken the rules “they should face the full force of the law”.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

However, he refused to suspend the candidates while the investigations were ongoing.

It comes as the election campaigns approach the last two weeks before the country heads to the polls.

Email the team electoraldysfunction@sky.uk, post on X to @BethRigby, or send a WhatsApp voice note on 07934 200 444.

Tory voters tell Sky News YouGov Voters’ Panel gambling scandal won’t make a difference – the party’s already dead and buried | Politics News

The Sky News YouGov Voters’ Panel has reacted overwhelmingly negatively to the alleged insider betting scandal, with some saying it would impact their voting intention.

Our exclusive panel gave snap reaction to the news some Conservative Party candidates are being investigated by the Gambling Commission over alleged bets relating to the date of the general election.

Most responses from our unique panel were damning.

Follow live general election updates

One 2019 Conservative voter said: “This is the final straw. I think this is over. It’s unattainable now and Rishi Sunak should step down and the Conservative Party has to start all over again.”

Another who also voted Tory in 2019 told us: “Makes you view the Tories in even a worse position than they currently are. It’s definitely doing them no favours.”

And for Tory voters who tell us they’re leaning towards Reform, this comment is striking.

“I don’t think the [alleged] betting scandal will have much of an impact on Sunak’s election campaign.

“I think it was doomed before… It’s just another nail in the coffin.”

Two other panellists used the same phrase.

👉 Tap here to follow Politics at Jack and Sam’s wherever you get your podcasts 👈

Read more
Has Sunak blundered with six-week campaign?
Labour on course for 200-seat majority
New scandal risks punching bruise for Tories

The language our panel used was resoundingly angry.

Looking at the words people used when talking about Rishi Sunak and the impact this could have on the Tories – “damaging”, “disgusting”, and “unsurprising” were among the most common.

The Sky News YouGov Voters’ Panel represents over 40 different constituencies, and a range of political views. At the start of the election campaign, they were all undecided who to vote for.

When asked whether the alleged scandal would impact how they vote, these are some of the responses among Conservative 2019 voters.

“I don’t think this is going to make much difference to the British and the Conservatives. They’re dead and buried in this election.”

Another said, “It comes across like he’s leading a bunch of clowns.

“He has absolutely no clue what they’re doing and what they’re up to and doesn’t really seem to have any control over them.”

Infected blood scandal ‘not an accident’, with ‘catalogue of failures’ and ‘downright deception’ by NHS and governments | UK News

The infected blood scandal was “not an accident” – and its failures lie with “successive governments, the NHS, and blood services”, a public inquiry has found.

From the 1970s, 30,000 people were “knowingly” infected with either HIV or Hepatitis C because “those in authority did not put patient safety first”, the inquiry’s report said. Around 3,000 people died.

Follow live:
‘Downright deception’ – latest on long-awaited report

The response of the government and NHS has “compounded” victims’ suffering, said inquiry chair Sir Brian Langstaff.

This included the “deliberate destruction of some documents” by Department of Health workers, in what Sir Brian described as a “pervasive cover-up” and “downright deception”.

“It could largely, though not entirely, have been avoided. And I report that it should have been,” he added.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

NHS ‘betrayed’ victims – inquiry chair

Among key findings are:

  • Patients were knowingly exposed to unacceptable risks of infection;
  • The risk of blood products causing severe infection were well known before most patients were treated – in the case of hepatitis since the end of the Second World War;
  • Transfusions were frequently given in situations where they were not clinically needed;
  • Pupils at Treloar’s school were regarded as “objects of research rather than children”;
  • Blood products imported to treat many people were unsafe and should not have been licensed for UK use;
  • There was no contact tracing carried out when Hepatitis C screenings were introduced;
  • There were repeated and ongoing failures by governments and the NHS to acknowledge people should not have been infected;
  • They repeatedly used inaccurate, misleading and defensive lines;
  • Infected people were “cruelly” told they received the best treatment available;
  • There was a refusal for decades to provide compensation;
  • Governments refused to set up a public inquiry until 2017

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Victims were ‘gas-lit for generations’

Sir Brian’s report makes 12 recommendations.

They include an immediate compensation scheme, memorials across the UK and at Treloar’s school, and that anyone who received a blood transfusion before 1996 be urgently tested for Hepatitis C.

New patients at any medical practice should also be asked if they had a transfusion before that time.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is expected to make an official apology on behalf of the government later today. The report stresses “it must be accompanied by action” for it to be meaningful.

Such action includes a “national recognition of this treatment disaster” and a change in culture across the NHS and civil service.

How the blood scandal happened

More than 30,000 people were infected with deadly viruses while they were receiving NHS care between the 1970s and 1990s.

The UK was not self-sufficient in blood donations in the early 1970s, so the government looked to the US for supplies to meet rising demand.

Batches of Factor VIII – an essential blood clotting protein which haemophiliacs do not produce naturally – started to be imported and used widely to treat the condition.

But much of it had been manufactured with blood collected from prisoners, drug addicts and other high-risk groups who were paid to give blood.

When the plasma was pooled together, it would take just one person carrying a virus to potentially infect an entire batch.

People were infected as donated blood was not tested for HIV until 1986 and hepatitis C until 1991.

The report mentions various politicians by name, including Ken Clarke, who was health secretary from 1988 to 1990.

It describes him as “unfairly dismissive” and “disparaging” towards victims, saying it would have “aggravated” their distress and upset.

Margaret Thatcher’s government claimed patients had “the best treatment available on the then-current medical advice” – but this was not true, the report says.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The victms of the scandal

‘I lost my twin, cousins and two friends’

After the 2,527-page document was published, victims spoke at a news conference in central London.

Clive Smith, of the Haemophilia Society, said the “cover-up” came as “no surprise” to him and others affected.

“We’ve known for decades. Now the country knows, the whole world knows,” he said. “This was systemic, by government, the civil service, and healthcare professionals.”

Mr Smith added: “There are doctors out there who should have been prosecuted for gross negligence manslaughter… those people should have been in the dock.”

Nigel Hamilton, from Haemophilia Northern Ireland, described the devastating personal impact of the scandal.

“I lost my twin on Christmas Day. I lost two cousins in the last two years. I have lost two friends in the last two months,” he said.

“The production of this report has been both healing and supportive. Compensation is not an answer to the problems we have. But it will help.

“Successive governments are culpable of abandonment and neglect.”

Select below to read more about some of the victims:

Read more:
The stories behind 100 victims
‘I gave my young son to his killers’
Analysis – Prosecutions must wait despite so many facing criticism

Jason Evans, from the Factor VIII campaign group, said: “Many of the politicians should hang their heads in shame… no single person has been responsible for this scandal.”

He added: “I would expect, over the coming days and weeks, for many more people to come forward and say sorry.”

And Andy Evans, representing the Tainted Blood campaigners, said victims had been “gaslit for generations”.

Challenging those in authority, he said: “We know that this should never have happened. What was your part in it?”

“Justice delayed really is – in this case – justice denied,” added Mr Evans.

Jackie Britton, from Bloodloss Families, said infected people were still struggling to get six-monthly scans and treatment.

“The government and the NHS should have a duty of care towards us,” she said.

“They have infected us, they have given us a death sentence.

Former Post Office boss Paula Vennells hands over 50 new documents ahead of scandal inquiry appearance | UK News

The Post Office scandal inquiry has said it will “urgently” review dozens of new documents it has received from former chief executive Paula Vennells.

The inquiry heard her legal team had conducted further searches ahead of her appearance next week and found 50 additional documents that had previously not been shared.

A spokesperson for the inquiry told Sky News: “Lead counsel to the inquiry Jason Beer KC confirmed this morning that the document was received by the inquiry at 11:17pm last night.

“The inquiry expects to receive further documents from Ms Vennells today, which it will review urgently.”

Mr Beer has previously raised questions about the necessity of receiving documents quickly – and reminded witnesses he “will not hesitate” to call them back to the inquiry if required.

It came as Ms Vennells‘s former colleague Alisdair Cameron, the Post Office’s former chief financial officer, faced questions on Friday about what he knew about the scandal.

He began his session with an apology to the sub-postmasters affected.

Screen grab taken from the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry of Alisdair Cameron, chief financial officer and former interim chief executive of Post Office Ltd, giving evidence to the inquiry at Aldwych House, central London, as part of phases five and six of the probe, which is looking at governance, redress and how the Post Office and others responded to the scandal. Picture date: Friday May 17, 2024.
Image:
Alisdair Cameron gave evidence to the inquiry on Friday. Pic: PA

Mr Cameron was also quizzed on a document he had written titled “what went wrong” in November 2020 for current chief executive Nick Read.

The ex-senior executive wrote: “We should have been tackling these issues 10 years ago.

“However, I do not believe that an earlier settlement was practically possible because the serious claimants believed there had been a miscarriage of justice and required recognition and an apology as much as they wanted money.

“Paula did not believe there had been a miscarriage and could not have got there emotionally.

“She seemed clear in her conviction from the day I joined that nothing had gone wrong and it was very clearly stated in my very first board meeting. She never, in my observation, deviated from that or seemed to particularly doubt that.”

Mr Beer asked: “So she was unwavering in her conviction that there had been no miscarriages of justice?”

Mr Cameron replied: “As far as I was concerned, yes.”

He said he had concluded that the Post Office had a “victim mentality” and its defence of the faulty accounting software was a “waste of public money”.

Read more:
Ex-head of IT ‘blocked Vennells’s number’
Post Office spin doctor said he was in a ‘corporate cover up’
Ex-Post Office boss accused of ‘lying throughout’ at inquiry

Mr Cameron also noted that the business was criticised for being “over-reliant on Horizon when we knew its weaknesses” and that the original prosecutions of sub-postmasters were a “deliberate miscarriage of justice”.

The final criticism was that the company should have “apologised and moved on years ago” and that defending itself had led to a “waste of public money and a postponement of justice”.

In the 2020 document, which was shown to the inquiry, Mr Cameron wrote: “At the heart of everything, the original sin of Post Office – and this may go back a very long time – is that: our culture, self-absorbed and defensive, stopped us from dealing with postmasters in a straightforward and acceptable way.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sub-postmaster cases may be ‘tainted’

More than 700 sub-postmasters were prosecuted by the Post Office and handed criminal convictions between 1999 and 2015 as Fujitsu’s faulty Horizon system made it appear as though money was missing at their branches.

Hundreds of sub-postmasters are still awaiting full compensation despite the government announcing those who have had convictions quashed are eligible for £600,000 payouts.

‘The worst thing you can imagine’: Doctor who treated patients in infected blood scandal speaks out | UK News

Edward Tuddenham is one of the few remaining haemophilia specialists to have treated patients at the beginning of the infected blood scandal in the early 1970s.

To have infected patients with HIV and Hepatitis C in the course of treating them “is the worst thing you can imagine,” he said.

Prof Tuddenham went on to be one of the UK’s leading haematologists, isolating the gene that makes the key “factor 8” protein lacking in many people suffering bleeding disorders.

His discovery led to safe treatments for haemophilia that do not require the use of potentially contaminated donated human blood – the ultimate cause of the infected blood scandal.

But he has been marred by his role in that scandal for nearly his entire career.

At the start of it, he treated haemophilia patients at the Royal Free Hospital in London.

The new treatment at the time was called factor concentrate, made using the key blood clotting factors missing from the blood of haemophiliacs. It was revolutionary.

More on Infected Blood Inquiry

“It was a huge step forward. And convenience, predictability, ability to give the patients a product he could take around with him and treat himself with,” said Prof Tuddenham.

Prior to concentrates becoming available, severe haemophiliacs would often have to be in hospital weekly having transfusions of a donor patient’s blood plasma to control bleeding that could otherwise be fatal.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Infected blood survivor speaks out

But even in the 1970s, there were concerns about the safety of the new medicines.

Made by concentrating the key clotting factors 8 and 9 from the blood of thousands of donors, any contamination in one would contaminate an entire batch.

The fact the seriousness of that risk was not appreciated at the time haunts his memory.

“The amount of effort that should have gone into inactivating viruses, and which had begun already in the late 1970s and had begun to be effective, simply wasn’t put into it,” he said.

If that effort had been made, thousands of haemophiliacs would not have been infected with hepatitis C which, we now know many of them were during the 1970s and 1980s.

It also would have saved haemophiliacs from a new virus that doctors such as Prof Tudenham unwittingly injected into their veins – HIV.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Blood scandal ‘the worst thing’

The virus made it into factor concentrates from US blood donors right at the start of the HIV epidemic in the United States in the early 1980s.

New, safer treatments arrived around 1986 but, by then, “it was too late,” said Prof Tuddenham.

‘I was attending funerals all the time’

By this point, Prof Tuddenham had left the clinic to work full time on the genetics of factor 8, work that would lead to far safer, synthetic treatments.

But he kept in touch with former patients.

“I was attending funerals regularly,” he said.

Prof Tuddenham is not a popular figure among the survivors of the infected blood scandal.

He has defended some of his actions at the time, and those of his colleagues, including the decision to conduct trials on children to investigate the effectiveness of new treatments which doctors knew could be contaminated with lethal viruses.

“Of course you couldn’t justify it now. But could you justify then?” he asked.

“A trial in a human was, at the time, the way to distinguish efficacy. But yes, it’s experimental medicine.

“Hindsight, of course, tells us that that led to a lot of people being infected and a lot of people dying as a result. At the time our balance of risk-benefit was seriously misinformed,” said Prof Tuddenham.

“To have caused this in the process of giving treatment is the worse thing you can imagine.”

It’s the job of the infected blood inquiry to decide what may have been acceptable, or even unavoidable at the time, from what was wrong – even by the standards of the day.

The inquiry is due to publish its final report on 20 May.

William Wragg: Tory MP at centre of Westminster sexting scandal quits parliamentary party | Politics News

William Wragg, who shared other politicians’ personal numbers as part of a honeytrap sexting scam, has “voluntarily” given up the Conservative whip – meaning he will now sit as an independent MP in the Commons.

Mr Wragg, the MP for Hazel Grove, Greater Manchester, yesterday resigned as vice-chairman of the 1922 Committee of Tory backbenchers and also stepped down from his role heading the Commons’ Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee.

A spokesperson for the Tory whips said today: “Following Will Wragg’s decision to step back from his roles on the Public Accounts and 1922 committees, he has also notified the chief whip that he is voluntarily relinquishing the Conservative whip.”

The move means that Mr Wragg is no longer a member of the Conservative parliamentary party and will sit as an independent MP, rather than a Tory MP, in parliament.

His decision to voluntarily give up the party whip came after he apologised last week after admitting to the Times that he had given his colleagues’ phone numbers to someone he met on a dating app.

Politics latest: Cameron defends Trump meeting – as ex-president reveals topics discussed

Scotland Yard has said it is investigating reports of the so-called “honeytrap” scam after it was suggested at least 12 men in political circles received unsolicited messages, raising security concerns.

Mr Wragg, who has already announced he is standing down at the next election, told the newspaper: “They had compromising things on me. They wouldn’t leave me alone.

“They would ask for people. I gave them some numbers, not all of them. I told him to stop. He’s manipulated me and now I’ve hurt other people.

“I got chatting to a guy on an app and we exchanged pictures. We were meant to meet up for drinks, but then didn’t.

“Then he started asking for numbers of people. I was worried because he had stuff on me. He gave me a WhatsApp number, which doesn’t work now. I’ve hurt people by being weak.

“I was scared. I’m mortified. I’m so sorry that my weakness has caused other people hurt.”

While some MPs have praised Mr Wragg for his apology, others had been less sympathetic and called on Rishi Sunak to remove the whip.

Following Mr Wragg’s decision, a senior Tory told Sky News: “Rishi is so weak Wragg decided he’d have to fire himself instead.”

Pat McFadden, Labour’s national campaign coordinator, agreed, saying: “The fact it was left to William Wragg to resign is another indictment of Rishi Sunak’s weakness.

“His MPs were left yet again being sent out to defend a position that has collapsed.

“Rishi Sunak puts party management first every time – and he can’t even do that properly. It is no way to run a country.”

Speaking to the Politics Hub on Sky News Conservative Party chair Richard Holden said Mr Wragg had done “the right thing” by giving up the whip of his own accord.

Read more:
UK position on Israel arms sales remains ‘unchanged’, says Lord Cameron
Rishi Sunak still expects Rwanda flights to take off from spring – despite reports local housing has been sold off

“He’s already issued a fulsome apology, he’s resigned from the 1922 committee executive… and he’s also given up the Conservative whip,” Mr Holden told host Adam Parsons.

“I think we already knew he wouldn’t be standing at the next election, he’s already announced he’s standing down, so yes I think that was the right thing to have done.”

Asked whether Mr Wragg’s decision to give up the whip suggested the prime minister was too “weak” to do it himself, Mr Holden said: “I think it’s pretty clear what’s happened here.

“William Wragg has made his decision and I think that’s the right thing.”

He pointed to the ongoing police investigation and said: “I think it’s important that we allow those investigations to continue.”