A vegan who failed to deal with a mouse infestation at her home because of her ethical beliefs has been fined by a court.
Margaret Manzoni, 73, of St Osyth in Essex, “considered the mice her pets” and “said they would not go to her neighbours because she looked after them”.
Tendring District Council prosecuted the pensioner for a second time after she did not comply with a previous order made in April.
At a hearing at Colchester Magistrates’ Court this month, Manzoni was told that while the court “respected her beliefs as an ethical vegan, others saw mice as vermin”, the council said.
The court said the “impact of the infestation on neighbours meant inaction was not appropriate”, according to the authority.
Manzoni admitted at the hearing on 6 October to charges of failing to comply with a notice under the Environmental Protection Act and a notice under the Prevention of Damage by Pests Act.
She was fined £1,500, with the court awarding the council costs of £2,395 and imposing a victim surcharge of £150.
The court heard that the council’s environmental health team was called in by neighbouring residents who were over-run by mice, causing property damage, due to conditions at Manzoni’s mid-terrace home, the council said.
Council staff made several visits and offered help, before issuing notices “ordering Manzoni to stop feeding birds, to clear the overgrown garden, and call in pest control”, the authority said.
“While some building works were carried out by the council, food and shelter continued to be provided by Manzoni for the mice – leading to an overpowering smell and which forced neighbours to move out,” a spokesman for Tendring District Council said.
Read more on Sky News:
Gaming can kill children with undiagnosed heart issues, scientists say
“Tendring District Council offered Manzoni alternative accommodation but, she considered the mice her pets, said they would not go to her neighbours because she looked after them, and refused to take action stating it went against her ‘ethical beliefs’.
“This led to the first prosecution, since which despite continued regular visits by the environmental health team nothing has changed; leaving the council no choice but to prosecute again.”